Homberg Judith R, Jagiellowicz Jadzia
Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Highly Sensitive Society, Cambridge, ON, Canada.
Mol Psychiatry. 2022 Jan;27(1):514-524. doi: 10.1038/s41380-021-01047-8. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
Expert opinion remains divided concerning the impact of putative risk factors on vulnerability to depression and other stress-related disorders. A large body of literature has investigated gene by environment interactions, particularly between the serotonin transporter polymorphism (5-HTTLPR) and negative environments, on the risk for depression. However, fewer studies have simultaneously investigated the outcomes in both negative and positive environments, which could explain some of the inconclusive findings. This is embodied by the concept of differential susceptibility, i.e., the idea that certain common gene polymorphisms, prenatal factors, and traits make some individuals not only disproportionately more susceptible and responsive to negative, vulnerability-promoting environments, but also more sensitive and responsive to positive, resilience-enhancing environmental conditions. Although this concept from the field of developmental psychology is well accepted and supported by behavioral findings, it is striking that its implementation in neuropsychiatric research is limited and that underlying neural mechanisms are virtually unknown. Based on neuroimaging studies that examined how factors mediating differential susceptibility affect brain function, we posit that environmental sensitivity manifests in increased salience network activity, increased salience and default mode network connectivity, and increased salience and central executive network connectivity. These changes in network function may bring about automatic exogenous attention for positive and negative stimuli and flexible attentional set-shifting. We conclude with a call to action; unraveling the neural mechanisms through which differential susceptibility factors mediate vulnerability and resilience may lead us to personalized preventive interventions.
关于假定的风险因素对抑郁症及其他应激相关障碍易感性的影响,专家意见仍存在分歧。大量文献研究了基因与环境的相互作用,特别是血清素转运体多态性(5-HTTLPR)与负面环境之间对抑郁症风险的影响。然而,同时研究负面和正面环境中结果的研究较少,这可能是一些研究结果尚无定论的部分原因。这体现在差异易感性的概念中,即某些常见的基因多态性、产前因素和特质使一些个体不仅对促进易感性的负面环境异常敏感且反应强烈,而且对增强恢复力的正面环境条件也更敏感且反应强烈。尽管发展心理学领域的这一概念已被广泛接受并得到行为学研究结果的支持,但令人惊讶的是,其在神经精神病学研究中的应用有限,且潜在的神经机制几乎未知。基于研究介导差异易感性的因素如何影响脑功能的神经影像学研究,我们认为环境敏感性表现为突显网络活动增加、突显网络与默认模式网络的连接性增加以及突显网络与中央执行网络的连接性增加。这些网络功能的变化可能会引发对正负刺激的自动外源性注意以及灵活的注意力转换。我们最后呼吁采取行动;阐明差异易感性因素介导易感性和恢复力的神经机制可能会引导我们采取个性化的预防干预措施。