Fernández-González Felipe José, Cañigral Aránzazu, Balbontín-Ayala Felipe, Gonzalo-Orden José Manuel, Carlos Felix de, Cobo Teresa, Fernández-Vázquez Jose Pedro, Sánchez-Lasheras Fernando, Vega José Antonio
University of Oviedo, Asturias, Spain.
University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Dental Press J Orthod. 2015 Oct;20(5):58-65. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.20.5.058-065.oar.
Orthodontic anchorage is one of the most challenging aspects of Orthodontics. Preventing undesired movement of teeth could result in safer and less complicated orthodontic treatment. Recently, several reviews have been published about the effects of different molecules on bone physiology and the clinical side effects in Orthodontics. However, the effects of local application of these substances on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement have not been assessed.
The aim of this research was to analyze the scientific evidence published in the literature about the effects of different molecules on orthodontic anchorage.
The literature was systematically reviewed using PubMed/Medline, Scopus and Cochrane databases from 2000 up to July 31st, 2014. Articles were independently selected by two different researchers based on previously established inclusion and exclusion criteria, with a concordance Kappa index of 0.86. The methodological quality of the reviewed papers was performed.
Search strategy identified 270 articles. Twenty-five of them were selected after application of inclusion/exclusion criteria, and only 11 qualified for final analysis. Molecules involved in orthodontic anchorage were divided into three main groups: osteoprotegerin (OPG), bisphosphonates (BPs) and other molecules (OMs).
Different drugs are able to alter the bone remodeling cycle, influencing osteoclast function and, therefore, tooth movement. Thus, they could be used in order to provide maximal anchorage while preventing undesired movements. OPG was found the most effective molecule in blocking the action of osteoclasts, thereby reducing undesired movements.
正畸支抗是正畸学中最具挑战性的方面之一。防止牙齿出现不期望的移动可使正畸治疗更安全且复杂性降低。最近,已有几篇关于不同分子对骨生理学的影响以及正畸学临床副作用的综述发表。然而,这些物质局部应用对正畸牙齿移动速率的影响尚未得到评估。
本研究的目的是分析文献中发表的关于不同分子对正畸支抗影响的科学证据。
使用PubMed/Medline、Scopus和Cochrane数据库对2000年至2014年7月31日的文献进行系统综述。由两名不同的研究人员根据先前确定的纳入和排除标准独立选择文章,一致性Kappa指数为0.86。对所审查论文的方法学质量进行评估。
检索策略共识别出270篇文章。应用纳入/排除标准后,其中25篇被选中,只有11篇符合最终分析要求。参与正畸支抗的分子分为三大类:骨保护素(OPG)、双膦酸盐(BPs)和其他分子(OMs)。
不同药物能够改变骨重塑周期,影响破骨细胞功能,进而影响牙齿移动。因此,它们可用于在防止不期望移动的同时提供最大支抗。发现OPG是阻断破骨细胞作用从而减少不期望移动的最有效分子。