Adams Jean, Bateman Belinda, Becker Frauke, Cresswell Tricia, Flynn Darren, McNaughton Rebekah, Oluboyede Yemi, Robalino Shannon, Ternent Laura, Sood Benjamin Gardner, Michie Susan, Shucksmith Janet, Sniehotta Falko F, Wigham Sarah
Centre for Diet and Activity Research, Medical Research Council Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Department of Child Health, Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, North Shields, UK.
Health Technol Assess. 2015 Nov;19(94):1-176. doi: 10.3310/hta19940.
Uptake of preschool vaccinations is less than optimal. Financial incentives and quasi-mandatory policies (restricting access to child care or educational settings to fully vaccinated children) have been used to increase uptake internationally, but not in the UK.
To provide evidence on the effectiveness, acceptability and economic costs and consequences of parental financial incentives and quasi-mandatory schemes for increasing the uptake of preschool vaccinations.
Systematic review, qualitative study and discrete choice experiment (DCE) with questionnaire.
Community, health and education settings in England.
Qualitative study - parents and carers of preschool children, health and educational professionals. DCE - parents and carers of preschool children identified as 'at high risk' and 'not at high risk' of incompletely vaccinating their children.
Qualitative study - focus groups and individual interviews. DCE - online questionnaire.
The review included studies exploring the effectiveness, acceptability or economic costs and consequences of interventions that offered contingent rewards or penalties with real material value for preschool vaccinations, or quasi-mandatory schemes that restricted access to 'universal' services, compared with usual care or no intervention. Electronic database, reference and citation searches were conducted.
Systematic review - there was insufficient evidence to conclude that the interventions considered are effective. There was some evidence that the quasi-mandatory interventions were acceptable. There was insufficient evidence to draw conclusions on economic costs and consequences. Qualitative study - there was little appetite for parental financial incentives. Quasi-mandatory schemes were more acceptable. Optimising current services was consistently preferred to the interventions proposed. DCE and questionnaire - universal parental financial incentives were preferred to quasi-mandatory interventions, which were preferred to targeted incentives. Those reporting that they would need an incentive to vaccinate their children completely required around £110. Those who did not felt that the maximum acceptable incentive was around £70.
Systematic review - a number of relevant studies were excluded as they did not meet the study design inclusion criteria. Qualitative study - few partially and non-vaccinating parents were recruited. DCE and questionnaire - data were from a convenience sample.
There is little current evidence on the effectiveness or economic costs and consequences of parental financial incentives and quasi-mandatory interventions for preschool vaccinations. Universal incentives are likely to be more acceptable than targeted ones. Preferences concerning incentives versus quasi-mandatory interventions may depend on the context in which these are elicited.
Further evidence is required on (i) the effectiveness and optimal configuration of parental financial incentive and quasi-mandatory interventions for preschool vaccinations - if effectiveness is confirmed, further evidence is required on how to communicate this to stakeholders and the impact on acceptability; and (ii) the acceptability of parental financial incentive and quasi-mandatory interventions for preschool vaccinations to members of the population who are not parents of preschool children or relevant health professionals. Further consideration should be given to (i) incorporating reasons for non-vaccination into new interventions for promoting vaccination uptake; and (ii) how existing services can be optimised.
This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42012003192.
The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.
学龄前儿童疫苗接种率未达最佳水平。经济激励措施和准强制性政策(限制未完全接种疫苗的儿童进入托儿机构或教育机构)已在国际上用于提高接种率,但在英国尚未采用。
提供有关父母经济激励措施和准强制性计划在提高学龄前儿童疫苗接种率方面的有效性、可接受性、经济成本及影响的证据。
系统评价、定性研究和离散选择实验(DCE)并结合问卷调查。
英格兰的社区、卫生和教育机构。
定性研究——学龄前儿童的父母和照料者、卫生和教育专业人员。DCE——被确定为孩子“高风险”和“非高风险”未完全接种疫苗的学龄前儿童的父母和照料者。
定性研究——焦点小组和个人访谈。DCE——在线问卷。
该综述纳入了探索干预措施有效性、可接受性或经济成本及影响的研究,这些干预措施为学龄前疫苗接种提供具有实际物质价值的偶然奖励或惩罚,或限制使用“普遍”服务的准强制性计划,并与常规护理或无干预措施进行比较。进行了电子数据库、参考文献和引文检索。
系统评价——没有足够证据得出所考虑的干预措施有效的结论。有一些证据表明准强制性干预措施是可接受的。没有足够证据就经济成本及影响得出结论。定性研究——父母对经济激励措施兴趣不大。准强制性计划更易被接受。与提议的干预措施相比,优化现有服务始终更受青睐。DCE和问卷调查——普遍的父母经济激励措施比准强制性干预措施更受青睐,准强制性干预措施又比针对性激励措施更受青睐。那些表示需要激励才会让孩子完全接种疫苗的人大约需要110英镑。那些不这样认为的人觉得可接受的最大激励约为70英镑。
系统评价——一些相关研究因不符合研究设计纳入标准而被排除。定性研究——招募的部分接种和未接种疫苗的父母很少。DCE和问卷调查——数据来自便利样本。
目前几乎没有证据表明父母经济激励措施和准强制性干预措施在学龄前疫苗接种方面的有效性、经济成本及影响。普遍激励措施可能比针对性激励措施更易被接受。对激励措施与准强制性干预措施的偏好可能取决于提出这些措施的背景。
需要进一步的证据来证明(i)父母经济激励措施和准强制性干预措施在学龄前疫苗接种方面的有效性和最佳配置——如果有效性得到证实,还需要进一步证据说明如何向利益相关者传达这一点以及对可接受性的影响;以及(ii)父母经济激励措施和准强制性干预措施对非学龄前儿童父母或相关卫生专业人员群体在学龄前疫苗接种方面的可接受性。应进一步考虑(i)将未接种疫苗的原因纳入促进疫苗接种的新干预措施中;以及(ii)如何优化现有服务。
本研究注册为PROSPERO CRD42012003192。
国家卫生研究院卫生技术评估计划。