Adams Jean, McNaughton Rebekah J, Wigham Sarah, Flynn Darren, Ternent Laura, Shucksmith Janet
MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
School of Health & Social Care, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 2;11(6):e0156843. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156843. eCollection 2016.
Childhood vaccinations are a core component of public health programmes globally. Recent measles outbreaks in the UK and USA have prompted debates about new ways to increase uptake of childhood vaccinations. Parental financial incentives and quasi-mandatory interventions (e.g. restricting entry to educational settings to fully vaccinated children) have been successfully used to increase uptake of childhood vaccinations in developing countries, but there is limited evidence of effectiveness in developed countries. Even if confirmed to be effective, widespread implementation of these interventions is dependent on acceptability to parents, professionals and other stakeholders.
We conducted a systematic review (n = 11 studies included), a qualitative study with parents (n = 91) and relevant professionals (n = 24), and an on-line survey with embedded discrete choice experiment with parents (n = 521) exploring acceptability of parental financial incentives and quasi-mandatory interventions for preschool vaccinations. Here we use Triangulation Protocol to synthesise findings from the three studies.
There was a consistent recognition that incentives and quasi-mandatory interventions could be effective, particularly in more disadvantaged groups. Universal incentives were consistently preferred to targeted ones, but relative preferences for quasi-mandatory interventions and universal incentives varied between studies. The qualitative work revealed a consistent belief that financial incentives were not considered an appropriate motivation for vaccinating children. The costs of financial incentive interventions appeared particularly salient and there were consistent concerns in the qualitative work that incentives did not represent the best use of resources for promoting preschool vaccinations. Various suggestions for improving delivery of the current UK vaccination programme as an alternative to incentives and quasi-mandates were made.
Parental financial incentives and quasi-mandatory interventions for increasing uptake of preschool vaccinations do not currently attract widespread enthusiastic support in the UK; but some potential benefits of these approaches are recognised.
儿童疫苗接种是全球公共卫生项目的核心组成部分。英国和美国近期爆发的麻疹疫情引发了关于提高儿童疫苗接种率新方法的讨论。父母经济激励措施和准强制性干预措施(如限制未完全接种疫苗的儿童进入教育机构)已成功用于提高发展中国家的儿童疫苗接种率,但在发达国家,其有效性的证据有限。即使被证实有效,这些干预措施的广泛实施也取决于父母、专业人员和其他利益相关者的接受程度。
我们进行了一项系统评价(纳入11项研究)、一项针对父母(91人)和相关专业人员(24人)的定性研究,以及一项针对父母的在线调查(521人),其中嵌入了离散选择实验,以探讨父母经济激励措施和准强制性干预措施对学龄前儿童疫苗接种的可接受性。在此,我们使用三角互证法综合三项研究的结果。
人们一致认为激励措施和准强制性干预措施可能有效,特别是在处境更为不利的群体中。普遍激励措施一直比有针对性的激励措施更受青睐,但不同研究对准强制性干预措施和普遍激励措施的相对偏好有所不同。定性研究表明,人们一致认为经济激励措施并非给儿童接种疫苗的合适动机。经济激励干预措施的成本似乎尤为突出,定性研究中一直有人担心激励措施并非促进学龄前儿童疫苗接种的最佳资源利用方式。针对如何改进当前英国疫苗接种计划的实施提出了各种建议,作为激励措施和准强制性措施的替代方案。
在英国,父母经济激励措施和准强制性干预措施目前并未获得广泛的热烈支持;但人们认识到了这些方法的一些潜在益处。