Suppr超能文献

头颈癌吞咽结果测量——它们如何比较?

Swallowing outcome measures in head and neck cancer--How do they compare?

作者信息

Pedersen A, Wilson Janet, McColl Elaine, Carding Paul, Patterson Jo

机构信息

Department of Ear, Nose and Throat Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

Institute for Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

出版信息

Oral Oncol. 2016 Jan;52:104-8. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2015.10.015. Epub 2015 Nov 10.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Dysphagia is a common and debilitating side effect of chemoradiotherapy. Assessment is difficult; swallowing is multifactorial and studies choose from a range of dysphagia assessments. This study intended to investigate the relationship between swallowing assessments of dysphagia in a cohort of patients and to evaluate whether clinical swallowing measures can predict patient reported swallowing outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred and seventy-three head and neck cancer patients from two teaching hospitals were recruited prospectively over 25 months. At three months follow-up patients were assessed using Rosenbeck's Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS), The 100 ml Water Swallow Test (WST), The Performance Status Scale: Normalcy of Diet and the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI).

RESULTS

The highest correlation was observed between the MDADI and Normalcy of Diet (rho 0.68) and the lowest between the MDADI and the PAS (rho 0.34). Using multiple regression the PAS and WST accounted for 44% of the variance in the MDADI scores (R2 = 0.44, F = 37.8, p < 0.001). On stepwise regression, the model only retained the Normalcy of Diet scores (R2 = 0.42, F=107.9, p < 0.001). Separating the PAS into subgroups, those with no penetration or aspiration on the PAS scored significantly higher on the MDADI (p = <0.001).

CONCLUSION

Patient reported swallowing outcomes were strongly aligned with diet restrictions but poorly aligned with clinical assessment. The WST, however, was more correlated than the PAS score, representing a more functional assessment. Clinical dysphagia, associated with significant morbidity, and patient reported dysphagia related to quality of life are not interchangeable and must be measured separately.

摘要

目的

吞咽困难是放化疗常见且使人虚弱的副作用。评估较为困难,因为吞咽受多种因素影响,且不同研究采用了一系列吞咽困难评估方法。本研究旨在调查一组患者吞咽困难评估之间的关系,并评估临床吞咽测量指标能否预测患者报告的吞咽结果。

材料与方法

前瞻性招募了来自两家教学医院的173名头颈部癌患者,为期25个月。在三个月随访时,使用罗森贝克渗透-误吸量表(PAS)、100毫升水吞咽试验(WST)、表现状态量表:饮食正常度以及MD安德森吞咽困难量表(MDADI)对患者进行评估。

结果

MDADI与饮食正常度之间的相关性最高(rho为0.68),MDADI与PAS之间的相关性最低(rho为0.34)。通过多元回归分析,PAS和WST可解释MDADI分数变异的44%(R2 = 0.44,F = 37.8,p < 0.001)。在逐步回归分析中,模型仅保留了饮食正常度分数(R2 = 0.42,F = 107.9,p < 0.001)。将PAS分为亚组后,PAS上无渗透或误吸的患者在MDADI上得分显著更高(p = <0.001)。

结论

患者报告的吞咽结果与饮食限制密切相关,但与临床评估相关性较差。然而,WST比PAS分数相关性更强,代表了一种更具功能性的评估。与严重发病率相关的临床吞咽困难和与生活质量相关的患者报告的吞咽困难不可相互替代,必须分别进行测量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验