Suppr超能文献

生态偏倚、混杂因素及效应修饰。

Ecological bias, confounding, and effect modification.

作者信息

Greenland S, Morgenstern H

机构信息

Division of Epidemiology, UCLA School of Public Health 90024.

出版信息

Int J Epidemiol. 1989 Mar;18(1):269-74. doi: 10.1093/ije/18.1.269.

Abstract

Ecological bias is sometimes attributed to confounding by the group variable (ie the variable used to define the ecological groups), or to risk factors associated with the group variable. We show that the group variable need not be a confounder (in the strict epidemiological sense) for ecological bias to occur: effect modification can lead to profound ecological bias, whether or not the group variable or the effect modifier are independent risk factors. Furthermore, an extraneous risk factor need not be associated with the study variable at the individual level in order to produce ecological bias. Thus the conditions for the production of ecological bias by a covariate are much broader than the conditions for the production of individual-level confounding by a covariate. We also show that standardization or ecological control of variables responsible for ecological bias are generally insufficient to remove such bias.

摘要

生态偏倚有时被归因于群组变量(即用于定义生态群组的变量)造成的混杂,或者归因于与群组变量相关的风险因素。我们表明,生态偏倚的发生并不一定要求群组变量是一个混杂因素(严格的流行病学意义上):效应修饰可导致严重的生态偏倚,无论群组变量或效应修饰因素是否为独立风险因素。此外,一个外部风险因素并不一定需要在个体层面与研究变量相关联才能产生生态偏倚。因此,协变量产生生态偏倚的条件比协变量产生个体层面混杂的条件要宽泛得多。我们还表明,对造成生态偏倚的变量进行标准化或生态控制通常不足以消除此类偏倚。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验