• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Comparative efficacy and safety of cefmetazole or cefoxitin in the prevention of postoperative infection following vaginal and abdominal hysterectomy.

作者信息

Roy S, Wilkins J, Galaif E, Azen C

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California School of Medicine.

出版信息

J Antimicrob Chemother. 1989 Apr;23 Suppl D:109-17. doi: 10.1093/jac/23.suppl_d.109.

DOI:10.1093/jac/23.suppl_d.109
PMID:2656624
Abstract

We evaluated three 1-g doses of cefmetazole in comparison with the standard three 2-g doses of cefoxitin for prophylaxis in vaginal or abdominal hysterectomy to determine efficacy and safety. The antibiotics were administered intravenously 30-90 min before the incision and were followed with additional intravenous doses 8 and 16 h or 6 and 12 h later, respectively. The patients received povidone-iodine vaginal preparations before surgery; vaginal packs, when used, contained no antibiotic agents. Vaginal cultures were obtained before the vaginal preparation, at the time of discharge from hospital and when there was a suggestion of operative site infection. The activity of both antibiotics against these organisms was tested. Patient demographic characteristics and surgical procedures were similar in each treatment group. The difference between the primary failure rates with the two antibiotics (2 of 35 (5.7%) with cefmetazole and 2 of 16 (12.5%) with cefoxitin) did not reach statistical significance, and results were similar for the two routes of hysterectomy. Cefmetazole was more active than cefoxitin against the majority of the aerobic and anaerobic organisms recovered, although approximately 20-30% of the isolates showed resistance, or intermediate sensitivity, generally to both antibiotics.

摘要

相似文献

1
Comparative efficacy and safety of cefmetazole or cefoxitin in the prevention of postoperative infection following vaginal and abdominal hysterectomy.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1989 Apr;23 Suppl D:109-17. doi: 10.1093/jac/23.suppl_d.109.
2
Single-dose cefmetazole versus multiple dose cefoxitin for prophylaxis in abdominal surgery.单剂量头孢美唑与多剂量头孢西丁用于腹部手术预防感染的比较
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1989 Apr;23 Suppl D:71-7. doi: 10.1093/jac/23.suppl_d.71.
3
Comparison of single-dose moxalactam and a three-dose regimen of cefoxitin for prophylaxis in vaginal hysterectomy.
Clin Pharm. 1986 Dec;5(12):988-93.
4
Cefmetazole versus cefoxitin in prevention of infections after abdominal surgery.头孢美唑与头孢西丁预防腹部手术后感染的比较。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1989 Apr;23 Suppl D:85-8. doi: 10.1093/jac/23.suppl_d.85.
5
Cefmetazole and cefonicid. Comparative efficacy and safety in preventing postoperative infections after vaginal and abdominal hysterectomy.
J Reprod Med. 1990 Nov;35(11 Suppl):1082-90.
6
Comparative evaluation of safety and efficacy of cefmetazole and cefoxitin in lower respiratory tract infections.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1989 Apr;23 Suppl D:39-46. doi: 10.1093/jac/23.suppl_d.39.
7
Prophylaxis in caesarean section with cefmetazole and cefoxitin.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1989 Apr;23 Suppl D:97-104. doi: 10.1093/jac/23.suppl_d.97.
8
A randomized prospective study of antibiotic prophylaxis during abdominal surgery.腹部手术期间抗生素预防的随机前瞻性研究。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1989 Apr;23 Suppl D:79-83. doi: 10.1093/jac/23.suppl_d.79.
9
Results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial program of single-dose ceftizoxime versus multiple-dose cefoxitin as prophylaxis for patients undergoing vaginal and abdominal hysterectomy.单剂量头孢唑肟与多剂量头孢西丁用于阴道和腹部子宫切除术患者预防性治疗的双盲、安慰剂对照临床试验项目结果
J Am Coll Surg. 1994 Feb;178(2):123-31.
10
Efficacy and safety of single-dose ceftizoxime vs. multiple-dose cefoxitin in preventing infection after vaginal hysterectomy.单剂量头孢唑肟与多剂量头孢西丁预防阴道子宫切除术后感染的疗效和安全性比较
J Reprod Med. 1988 Jan;33(1 Suppl):149-53.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of surgical site infection (SSI) following gynaecological cancer surgery in the UK: a trainee-led multicentre audit and service evaluation.英国妇科癌症手术后手术部位感染(SSI)的影响:一项由受训者主导的多中心审计和服务评估。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jan 24;9(1):e024853. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024853.
2
Antibiotic prophylaxis for elective hysterectomy.择期子宫切除术的抗生素预防
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 18;6(6):CD004637. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004637.pub2.
3
Cefminox versus Cefoxitin in Hysterectomy Prophylaxis : Clinical Efficacy and Serum and Tissue Concentrations.
头孢米诺与头孢西丁用于子宫切除术预防:临床疗效及血清和组织浓度
Clin Drug Investig. 1997 Jun;13(6):317-25. doi: 10.2165/00044011-199713060-00004.
4
Predicting postoperative fever and bacterial colonization on packing material following endoscopic endonasal surgery.预测鼻内镜手术后发热及填塞材料上的细菌定植情况。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Jan;274(1):167-173. doi: 10.1007/s00405-016-4189-9. Epub 2016 Jul 1.
5
Single-blind, prospective, randomized study of cefmetazole and cefoxitin in the treatment of postcesarean endometritis.头孢美唑与头孢西丁治疗剖宫产术后子宫内膜炎的单盲、前瞻性、随机研究
Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 1995;3(1):28-33. doi: 10.1155/S1064744995000263.