• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项关于电话干预以提高苏格兰社会贫困地区乳腺癌筛查参与率的试点随机对照试验(TELBRECS)。

A pilot randomized controlled trial of telephone intervention to increase Breast Cancer Screening uptake in socially deprived areas in Scotland (TELBRECS).

作者信息

Chambers Julie A, Gracie Kerry, Millar Rosemary, Cavanagh Julie, Archibald Debbie, Cook Alan, O'Carroll Ronan E

机构信息

Psychology, School of Natural Sciences, Stirling University, Stirling, FK9 4LA, UK

Psychology, School of Natural Sciences, Stirling University, Stirling, FK9 4LA, UK.

出版信息

J Med Screen. 2016 Sep;23(3):141-9. doi: 10.1177/0969141315608212. Epub 2015 Nov 13.

DOI:10.1177/0969141315608212
PMID:26566950
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether a brief telephone support intervention could increase breast cancer screening uptake among lower socio-demographic women in Scotland, via eliciting and addressing barriers to screening attendance.

METHODS

In a pilot randomized controlled trial, participants receiving a reminder letter for a missed screening appointment (February-June 2014) were randomized to four arms: No telephone call (control), Simple telephone reminder (TEL), Telephone support (TEL-SUPP), or Telephone support plus anticipated regret (TEL-SUPP-AR). Primary outcomes were making an appointment and attending breast screening.

RESULTS

Of 856 women randomized and analysed on intention-to-treat basis, compared with controls, more women in the telephone intervention groups made an appointment (control: 8.8%, TEL: 20.3%, TEL-SUPP: 14.1%; TEL-SUPP-AR: 16.8%, χ(2)(3) = 12.0, p = .007) and attended breast screening (control: 6.9%, TEL: 16.5%, TEL-SUPP: 11.3%; TEL-SUPP-AR: 13.1%, χ(2)(3) = 9.8, p = .020). Of 559 women randomized to the three telephone groups, 404 were successfully contacted and 247 participated in the intervention. Intervention participants (ie. per protocol analysis) were more likely to make (17% versus 10%, χ(2)(1) = 7.0, p = .008) and attend (13% versus 7%, χ(2)(1) = 5.5, p = .019) an appointment than non-participants, but there were no differences in attendance between the three telephone groups.

CONCLUSIONS

A simple telephone reminder doubled attendance at breast screening in women from lower socio-demographic areas who had not attended their initial appointment, compared with a reminder letter only (odds ratio 2.12, 95% CI (1.2, 3.8)). However, contacting women proved problematic and there was no additional effect of telephone support or anticipated regret.

摘要

目的

通过找出并解决阻碍乳腺癌筛查的因素,确定简短的电话支持干预措施能否提高苏格兰社会人口统计学特征较低的女性的乳腺癌筛查参与率。

方法

在一项试点随机对照试验中,将收到错过筛查预约提醒信的参与者(2014年2月至6月)随机分为四组:无电话干预(对照组)、简单电话提醒(TEL)、电话支持(TEL-SUPP)或电话支持加预期遗憾提示(TEL-SUPP-AR)。主要结局是预约筛查和参加乳腺癌筛查。

结果

在按意向性分析随机分组并分析的856名女性中,与对照组相比,电话干预组中有更多女性预约了筛查(对照组:8.8%,TEL组:20.3%,TEL-SUPP组:14.1%;TEL-SUPP-AR组:16.8%,χ(2)(3)=12.0,p=0.007)并参加了乳腺癌筛查(对照组:6.9%,TEL组:16.5%,TEL-SUPP组:11.3%;TEL-SUPP-AR组:13.1%,χ(2)(3)=9.8,p=0.020)。在随机分入三个电话组的559名女性中,404名被成功联系上,247名参与了干预。干预参与者(即符合方案分析)比未参与者更有可能预约(17%对10%,χ(2)(1)=7.0,p=0.008)和参加筛查(13%对7%,χ(2)(1)=5.5,p=0.019),但三个电话组在参加筛查方面没有差异。

结论

与仅收到提醒信相比,简单的电话提醒使社会人口统计学特征较低地区未参加初次预约的女性参加乳腺癌筛查的人数增加了一倍(优势比2.12,95%置信区间(1.2, 3.8))。然而,事实证明与女性取得联系存在问题,电话支持或预期遗憾提示并没有额外效果。

相似文献

1
A pilot randomized controlled trial of telephone intervention to increase Breast Cancer Screening uptake in socially deprived areas in Scotland (TELBRECS).一项关于电话干预以提高苏格兰社会贫困地区乳腺癌筛查参与率的试点随机对照试验(TELBRECS)。
J Med Screen. 2016 Sep;23(3):141-9. doi: 10.1177/0969141315608212. Epub 2015 Nov 13.
2
A pilot telephone intervention to increase uptake of breast cancer screening in socially deprived areas in Scotland (TELBRECS): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.一项旨在提高苏格兰社会贫困地区乳腺癌筛查参与率的电话干预试点研究(TELBRECS):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
BMC Public Health. 2014 Aug 9;14:824. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-824.
3
Signed family physician reminder letters to women overdue for screening mammography: A randomized clinical trial.给未按时进行乳腺钼靶筛查的女性的家庭医生签署提醒信:一项随机临床试验。
J Med Screen. 2018 Sep;25(3):149-154. doi: 10.1177/0969141317719921. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
4
A community peer-volunteer telephone reminder call to increase breast cancer-screening attendance.社区同伴志愿者电话提醒呼叫以提高乳腺癌筛查参与率。
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2010 Jul;37(4):E312-7. doi: 10.1188/10.ONF.E312-E317.
5
Effectiveness of timed and non-timed second appointments in improving uptake in breast cancer screening.定时与非定时二次预约在提高乳腺癌筛查参与率方面的有效性。
J Med Screen. 2016 Sep;23(3):160-3. doi: 10.1177/0969141315624937. Epub 2016 Mar 2.
6
A telephone reminder intervention to improve breast screening information and access.电话提醒干预以改善乳腺筛查信息和可及性。
Public Health. 2014 Nov;128(11):1017-22. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2014.09.007. Epub 2014 Nov 18.
7
Effect of second timed appointments for non-attenders of breast cancer screening in England: a randomised controlled trial.英国针对未参加乳腺癌筛查者的第二次定时预约的效果:一项随机对照试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Jul;18(7):972-980. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30340-6. Epub 2017 May 15.
8
Telephone counseling and attendance in a national mammography-screening program a randomized controlled trial.电话咨询和参与全国乳腺 X 光筛查计划:一项随机对照试验。
Am J Prev Med. 2011 Oct;41(4):421-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.06.040.
9
Reducing inequalities by supporting individuals to make informed decisions about accepting their breast screening invitations.通过支持个人做出明智的决定来接受其乳房筛查邀请,从而减少不平等现象。
J Med Screen. 2024 Sep;31(3):176-181. doi: 10.1177/09691413241230925. Epub 2024 Feb 12.
10
Telephone call reminders and attendance in an adolescent clinic.青少年诊所中的电话提醒与就诊情况
Pediatrics. 1998 Jun;101(6):E6. doi: 10.1542/peds.101.6.e6.

引用本文的文献

1
Characteristics of interventions aimed at reducing inequalities along the cancer continuum: A scoping review.旨在减少癌症连续过程中不平等现象的干预措施的特征:一项范围综述。
Int J Cancer. 2025 Sep 15;157(6):1043-1054. doi: 10.1002/ijc.35478. Epub 2025 May 26.
2
Advancing Mammographic Screening Among Underserved Groups: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Intervention Strategies to Increase Breast Cancer Screening Uptake.在服务不足群体中推进乳腺钼靶筛查:增加乳腺癌筛查接受率的干预策略的系统评价和荟萃分析
Public Health Rev. 2025 Apr 4;46:1607873. doi: 10.3389/phrs.2025.1607873. eCollection 2025.
3
A consensus approach: Understanding the support needs of women in Newport West, Wales, to participate in breast screening.
共识方法:了解威尔士新港西部妇女参与乳房筛查的支持需求。
Health Expect. 2023 Jun;26(3):1065-1080. doi: 10.1111/hex.13720. Epub 2023 Feb 9.
4
Evaluating the impact of a novel behavioural science informed animation upon breast cancer screening uptake: protocol for a randomised controlled trial.评估一部基于行为科学的新型动画对乳腺癌筛查参与率的影响:一项随机对照试验方案
BMC Public Health. 2022 Jul 19;22(1):1388. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13781-x.
5
Effect of an information leaflet on breast cancer screening participation: A cluster randomized controlled trial.信息单页对乳腺癌筛查参与的影响:一项整群随机对照试验。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jul 3;21(1):1301. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11360-0.
6
Interventions to improve adherence to surveillance guidelines in survivors of childhood cancer: a systematic review.干预措施以提高儿童癌症幸存者对监测指南的依从性:系统评价。
J Cancer Surviv. 2019 Oct;13(5):713-729. doi: 10.1007/s11764-019-00790-w. Epub 2019 Jul 24.
7
The breast cancer paradox: A systematic review of the association between area-level deprivation and breast cancer screening uptake in Europe.乳腺癌悖论:欧洲地区层面贫困与乳腺癌筛查接受情况之间关联的系统评价
Cancer Epidemiol. 2019 Jun;60:77-85. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2019.03.008. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
8
Interventions to Engage Affective Forecasting in Health-Related Decision Making: A Meta-Analysis.干预措施在健康相关决策中的情感预测:一项荟萃分析。
Ann Behav Med. 2018 Feb 5;52(2):157-174. doi: 10.1093/abm/kax024.