Chambers Julie A, Gracie Kerry, Millar Rosemary, Cavanagh Julie, Archibald Debbie, Cook Alan, O'Carroll Ronan E
Psychology, School of Natural Sciences, Stirling University, Stirling, FK9 4LA, UK
Psychology, School of Natural Sciences, Stirling University, Stirling, FK9 4LA, UK.
J Med Screen. 2016 Sep;23(3):141-9. doi: 10.1177/0969141315608212. Epub 2015 Nov 13.
To determine whether a brief telephone support intervention could increase breast cancer screening uptake among lower socio-demographic women in Scotland, via eliciting and addressing barriers to screening attendance.
In a pilot randomized controlled trial, participants receiving a reminder letter for a missed screening appointment (February-June 2014) were randomized to four arms: No telephone call (control), Simple telephone reminder (TEL), Telephone support (TEL-SUPP), or Telephone support plus anticipated regret (TEL-SUPP-AR). Primary outcomes were making an appointment and attending breast screening.
Of 856 women randomized and analysed on intention-to-treat basis, compared with controls, more women in the telephone intervention groups made an appointment (control: 8.8%, TEL: 20.3%, TEL-SUPP: 14.1%; TEL-SUPP-AR: 16.8%, χ(2)(3) = 12.0, p = .007) and attended breast screening (control: 6.9%, TEL: 16.5%, TEL-SUPP: 11.3%; TEL-SUPP-AR: 13.1%, χ(2)(3) = 9.8, p = .020). Of 559 women randomized to the three telephone groups, 404 were successfully contacted and 247 participated in the intervention. Intervention participants (ie. per protocol analysis) were more likely to make (17% versus 10%, χ(2)(1) = 7.0, p = .008) and attend (13% versus 7%, χ(2)(1) = 5.5, p = .019) an appointment than non-participants, but there were no differences in attendance between the three telephone groups.
A simple telephone reminder doubled attendance at breast screening in women from lower socio-demographic areas who had not attended their initial appointment, compared with a reminder letter only (odds ratio 2.12, 95% CI (1.2, 3.8)). However, contacting women proved problematic and there was no additional effect of telephone support or anticipated regret.
通过找出并解决阻碍乳腺癌筛查的因素,确定简短的电话支持干预措施能否提高苏格兰社会人口统计学特征较低的女性的乳腺癌筛查参与率。
在一项试点随机对照试验中,将收到错过筛查预约提醒信的参与者(2014年2月至6月)随机分为四组:无电话干预(对照组)、简单电话提醒(TEL)、电话支持(TEL-SUPP)或电话支持加预期遗憾提示(TEL-SUPP-AR)。主要结局是预约筛查和参加乳腺癌筛查。
在按意向性分析随机分组并分析的856名女性中,与对照组相比,电话干预组中有更多女性预约了筛查(对照组:8.8%,TEL组:20.3%,TEL-SUPP组:14.1%;TEL-SUPP-AR组:16.8%,χ(2)(3)=12.0,p=0.007)并参加了乳腺癌筛查(对照组:6.9%,TEL组:16.5%,TEL-SUPP组:11.3%;TEL-SUPP-AR组:13.1%,χ(2)(3)=9.8,p=0.020)。在随机分入三个电话组的559名女性中,404名被成功联系上,247名参与了干预。干预参与者(即符合方案分析)比未参与者更有可能预约(17%对10%,χ(2)(1)=7.0,p=0.008)和参加筛查(13%对7%,χ(2)(1)=5.5,p=0.019),但三个电话组在参加筛查方面没有差异。
与仅收到提醒信相比,简单的电话提醒使社会人口统计学特征较低地区未参加初次预约的女性参加乳腺癌筛查的人数增加了一倍(优势比2.12,95%置信区间(1.2, 3.8))。然而,事实证明与女性取得联系存在问题,电话支持或预期遗憾提示并没有额外效果。