• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

信息单页对乳腺癌筛查参与的影响:一项整群随机对照试验。

Effect of an information leaflet on breast cancer screening participation: A cluster randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Evaluation, IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Passeig Marítim 25-29, 08003, Barcelona, Spain.

Preventive Medicine and Public Health Training Unit PSMar-ASPB-UPF, Passeig Marítim 25-29, 08003, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2021 Jul 3;21(1):1301. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11360-0.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-021-11360-0
PMID:34217258
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8254065/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of an information leaflet about the risk-benefit balance of breast cancer screening on women's participation.

METHODS

This cluster randomized controlled trial was conducted within a population-based breast cancer screening program and included women from the catchment areas of two hospitals in Barcelona, Spain. We evaluated women aged 50-69 years invited to screening between September 2019 and January 2020. The intervention group received an information leaflet on the benefits and harms of mammography screening. The control group received the usual invitation letter. The clusters consisted of the processing days of the invitation letter, assigned to the intervention with a simple random allocation scheme. We compared the participation rate at the individual level between groups, stratified by hospital and by per-protocol and intention-to-treat analyses.

RESULTS

We included 11,119 women (137 clusters): 5416 in the intervention group (66 clusters) and 5703 in the control group (71 clusters). A total of 36% (1964/5393) of the women in the intervention group and 37% (2135/5694) of those in the control group attended screening, respectively. Overall, we found no differences in participation among groups (difference in participation - 1.1%; 95%CI; - 2.9 to 0.7%). In a hospital attending a population with a low socioeconomic status, attendance was lower in the intervention group (- 1.4, 95%CI: - 5.7% to - 0.03%).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall participation in our program was unaffected by a new information leaflet on the risk-benefit balance of breast cancer screening. However, participation was lower in certain populations with lower socioeconomic status TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registration number ISRCTN13848929 .

摘要

目的

评估关于乳腺癌筛查风险-获益平衡的信息单页对女性参与度的影响。

方法

这是一项在基于人群的乳腺癌筛查计划内开展的、采用整群随机对照试验设计的研究,纳入了来自西班牙巴塞罗那两家医院的筛查对象。我们评估了 2019 年 9 月至 2020 年 1 月期间受邀参加筛查的 50-69 岁女性。干预组收到了一份关于乳腺 X 线筛查的获益和危害的信息单页,而对照组则收到了常规的邀请信。各聚类由邀请信的处理日组成,采用简单随机分配方案将其分配到干预组。我们按医院分层,在个体水平上比较了两组之间的参与率,并分别进行了意向性治疗分析和符合方案分析。

结果

我们纳入了 11119 名女性(137 个聚类):干预组 5416 名(66 个聚类),对照组 5703 名(71 个聚类)。干预组中有 36%(1964/5393)的女性接受了筛查,而对照组中有 37%(2135/5694)的女性接受了筛查。总体而言,两组之间的参与率没有差异(差异为 1.1%;95%CI:-2.9%至 0.7%)。在一家服务于社会经济地位较低人群的医院中,干预组的参与率较低(-1.4%,95%CI:-5.7%至 -0.03%)。

结论

总体而言,我们的方案中新增的乳腺癌筛查风险-获益平衡信息单页并未对参与度产生影响。然而,在社会经济地位较低的人群中,参与度较低。

试验注册

临床试验注册号 ISRCTN84522364 。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/32c1/8254342/3abbd0445a56/12889_2021_11360_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/32c1/8254342/c3c23a7286aa/12889_2021_11360_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/32c1/8254342/f2bc9d1eba42/12889_2021_11360_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/32c1/8254342/3abbd0445a56/12889_2021_11360_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/32c1/8254342/c3c23a7286aa/12889_2021_11360_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/32c1/8254342/f2bc9d1eba42/12889_2021_11360_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/32c1/8254342/3abbd0445a56/12889_2021_11360_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect of an information leaflet on breast cancer screening participation: A cluster randomized controlled trial.信息单页对乳腺癌筛查参与的影响:一项整群随机对照试验。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jul 3;21(1):1301. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11360-0.
2
The effect of information about the benefits and harms of mammography on women's decision-making: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.乳腺钼靶检查利弊信息对女性决策的影响:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2017 Sep 12;18(1):426. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2161-7.
3
Effect of information about the benefits and harms of mammography on women's decision making: The InforMa randomised controlled trial.乳腺 X 线摄影术的获益和危害信息对女性决策的影响:InforMa 随机对照试验。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 26;14(3):e0214057. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214057. eCollection 2019.
4
[Tailored Breast Screening Trial (TBST)].[定制乳房筛查试验(TBST)]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Jul-Oct;37(4-5):317-27.
5
The use of text messages as an alternative invitation method for breast cancer screening: A randomized controlled trial (M-TICS study).短信作为乳腺癌筛查替代邀请方式的应用:一项随机对照试验(M-TICS 研究)。
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 29;19(8):e0306720. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306720. eCollection 2024.
6
Effect of an Intervention in General Practice to Increase the Participation of Immigrants in Cervical Cancer Screening: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.综合实践干预对提高移民参与宫颈癌筛查的效果:一项集群随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Apr 1;3(4):e201903. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.1903.
7
Decision aid on breast cancer screening reduces attendance rate: results of a large-scale, randomized, controlled study by the DECIDEO group.乳腺癌筛查决策辅助工具降低了参与率:DECIDEO 小组的一项大规模随机对照研究结果
Oncotarget. 2016 Mar 15;7(11):12885-92. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.7332.
8
Strategies for increasing women participation in community breast cancer screening.提高女性参与社区乳腺癌筛查的策略。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001;2001(1):CD002943. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002943.
9
Effect of second timed appointments for non-attenders of breast cancer screening in England: a randomised controlled trial.英国针对未参加乳腺癌筛查者的第二次定时预约的效果:一项随机对照试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Jul;18(7):972-980. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30340-6. Epub 2017 May 15.
10
Impact of altering the invitation package on screening participation among never-screeners in the Flemish population-based cancer screening programs.改变邀请套餐对弗拉芒人群为基础的癌症筛查项目中从未筛查者参与筛查的影响。
Eur J Cancer Prev. 2024 Mar 1;33(2):181-184. doi: 10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000848. Epub 2023 Dec 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Preferences for the Use of Artificial Intelligence for Breast Cancer Screening in Australia: A Discrete Choice Experiment.澳大利亚乳腺癌筛查中使用人工智能的偏好:一项离散选择实验
Patient. 2025 May 10. doi: 10.1007/s40271-025-00742-w.
2
Advancing Mammographic Screening Among Underserved Groups: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Intervention Strategies to Increase Breast Cancer Screening Uptake.在服务不足群体中推进乳腺钼靶筛查:增加乳腺癌筛查接受率的干预策略的系统评价和荟萃分析
Public Health Rev. 2025 Apr 4;46:1607873. doi: 10.3389/phrs.2025.1607873. eCollection 2025.
3
A Population Survey on Barriers and Facilitators to Breast Cancer Screening Based on the Theoretical Domains Framework.

本文引用的文献

1
Benefits and harms of breast cancer mammography screening for women at average risk of breast cancer: A systematic review for the European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer.乳腺癌平均风险女性乳腺癌筛查的获益与危害:欧盟委员会乳腺癌倡议的系统评价。
J Med Screen. 2021 Dec;28(4):389-404. doi: 10.1177/0969141321993866. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
2
Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis: A Synopsis of the European Breast Guidelines.乳腺癌筛查与诊断:欧洲乳腺指南概要。
Ann Intern Med. 2020 Jan 7;172(1):46-56. doi: 10.7326/M19-2125. Epub 2019 Nov 26.
3
Effect of information about the benefits and harms of mammography on women's decision making: The InforMa randomised controlled trial.
一项基于理论领域框架的乳腺癌筛查障碍与促进因素的人群调查。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Feb 14;15(2):209. doi: 10.3390/bs15020209.
4
Breast cancer: a randomized controlled trial assessing the effect of a decision aid on mammography screening uptake: study protocol.乳腺癌:一项评估决策辅助工具对乳房X光检查筛查接受率影响的随机对照试验:研究方案。
Front Oncol. 2023 Apr 24;13:1128467. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1128467. eCollection 2023.
5
Online information about mammography screening in Italy from 2014 to 2021.2014 年至 2021 年意大利关于乳腺 X 光筛查的在线信息。
BMC Womens Health. 2022 Apr 27;22(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s12905-022-01718-w.
乳腺 X 线摄影术的获益和危害信息对女性决策的影响:InforMa 随机对照试验。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 26;14(3):e0214057. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214057. eCollection 2019.
4
U.S. women's perceived importance of the harms and benefits of mammograms and associations with screening ambivalence: Results from a national survey.美国女性对乳房 X 光检查危害和益处的认知重要性及其与筛查矛盾心理的关系:一项全国性调查的结果。
Prev Med. 2019 Jun;123:130-137. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.03.023. Epub 2019 Mar 16.
5
Uncertain times: A survey of Canadian women's perspectives toward mammography screening.不确定时期:加拿大女性对乳房 X 光筛查看法的调查。
Prev Med. 2018 Jul;112:209-215. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.04.021. Epub 2018 Apr 18.
6
Assessment of the effects of decision aids about breast cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis.乳腺癌筛查决策辅助工具效果评估:一项系统综述与荟萃分析
BMJ Open. 2017 Oct 6;7(10):e016894. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016894.
7
A cross-sectional survey assessing factors associated with reading cancer screening information: previous screening behaviour, demographics and decision-making style.一项横断面调查,评估与阅读癌症筛查信息相关的因素:既往筛查行为、人口统计学特征和决策风格。
BMC Public Health. 2017 Apr 18;17(1):327. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4224-9.
8
Use of patient decision aids increased younger women's reluctance to begin screening mammography: a systematic review and meta-analysis.使用患者决策辅助工具增加了年轻女性开始进行乳腺钼靶筛查的顾虑:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Jul;32(7):803-812. doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-4027-9. Epub 2017 Mar 13.
9
Screening for Breast Cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.乳腺癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
Ann Intern Med. 2016 Feb 16;164(4):279-96. doi: 10.7326/M15-2886. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
10
Harms of Breast Cancer Screening: Systematic Review to Update the 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation.乳腺癌筛查的危害:系统评价更新 2009 年美国预防服务工作组建议。
Ann Intern Med. 2016 Feb 16;164(4):256-67. doi: 10.7326/M15-0970. Epub 2016 Jan 12.