McCabe Aileen Mairéad, Kuppermann Nathan
Emergency Care Research Unit, Division of Population Health Sciences, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Departments of Emergency Medicine and Pediatrics, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA.
Acad Emerg Med. 2015 Dec;22(12):1372-9. doi: 10.1111/acem.12819. Epub 2015 Nov 14.
The generation, validation, and then translation of definitive evidence to bedside evidence-based practice is inconsistent and presents many challenges to emergency department (ED) researchers and clinicians. This is particularly true for diagnostic imaging in the ED, where benefits and drawbacks may be difficult to assess in the chaotic ED setting. This article describes, in large part, the experience of the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) in deriving and validating the traumatic brain injury prediction rules and how PECARN is translating these prediction rules into clinical practice. Furthermore, we discuss the potential for patient/parent shared decision-making with a focus on patient-centered outcomes in ED research and the role this shared decision-making may play in enhancing knowledge translation and implementation of evidence-based care in the ED.
确定性证据的产生、验证,然后转化为床边循证实践,这一过程并不连贯,给急诊科研究人员和临床医生带来了诸多挑战。急诊科的诊断成像尤其如此,在混乱的急诊科环境中,其利弊可能难以评估。本文在很大程度上描述了儿科急诊护理应用研究网络(PECARN)在推导和验证创伤性脑损伤预测规则方面的经验,以及PECARN如何将这些预测规则转化为临床实践。此外,我们讨论了患者/家长共同决策的可能性,重点关注急诊科研究中以患者为中心的结果,以及这种共同决策在促进急诊科循证护理的知识转化和实施中可能发挥的作用。