Brenner Samantha K, Kaushal Rainu, Grinspan Zachary, Joyce Christine, Kim Inho, Allard Rhonda J, Delgado Diana, Abramson Erika L
Department of Healthcare Policy and Research, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA Center for Healthcare Informatics and Policy, New York, NY, USA Department of Medicine, Stanford School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
Department of Healthcare Policy and Research, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA Center for Healthcare Informatics and Policy, New York, NY, USA Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA Department of Pediatrics, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 Sep;23(5):1016-36. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv138. Epub 2015 Nov 13.
To systematically review studies assessing the effects of health information technology (health IT) on patient safety outcomes.
The authors employed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement methods. MEDLINE, Cumulative Index to Nursing Allied Health (CINAHL), EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases, from 2001 to June 2012, were searched. Descriptive and comparative studies were included that involved use of health IT in a clinical setting and measured effects on patient safety outcomes.
Data on setting, subjects, information technology implemented, and type of patient safety outcomes were all abstracted. The quality of the studies was evaluated by 2 independent reviewers (scored from 0 to 10). A total of 69 studies met inclusion criteria. Quality scores ranged from 1 to 9. There were 25 (36%) studies that found benefit of health IT on direct patient safety outcomes for the primary outcome measured, 43 (62%) studies that either had non-significant or mixed findings, and 1 (1%) study for which health IT had a detrimental effect. Neither the quality of the studies nor the rate of randomized control trials performed changed over time. Most studies that demonstrated a positive benefit of health IT on direct patient safety outcomes were inpatient, single-center, and either cohort or observational trials studying clinical decision support or computerized provider order entry.
Many areas of health IT application remain understudied and the majority of studies have non-significant or mixed findings. Our study suggests that larger, higher quality studies need to be conducted, particularly in the long-term care and ambulatory care settings.
系统评价评估健康信息技术(健康IT)对患者安全结局影响的研究。
作者采用系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)声明方法。检索了2001年至2012年6月的MEDLINE、护理学与健康相关学科累积索引(CINAHL)、EMBASE和Cochrane图书馆数据库。纳入了描述性和比较性研究,这些研究涉及在临床环境中使用健康IT并测量对患者安全结局的影响。
提取了关于研究背景、受试者、实施的信息技术以及患者安全结局类型的数据。由2名独立评审员对研究质量进行评估(评分范围为0至10)。共有69项研究符合纳入标准。质量评分范围为1至9。有25项(36%)研究发现健康IT对所测量的主要结局的直接患者安全结局有益,43项(62%)研究结果不显著或结果混杂,1项(1%)研究发现健康IT有不利影响。研究质量和随机对照试验的实施率均未随时间变化。大多数证明健康IT对直接患者安全结局有积极益处的研究是住院患者、单中心研究,以及研究临床决策支持或计算机化医嘱录入的队列研究或观察性试验。
健康IT应用的许多领域仍未得到充分研究,大多数研究结果不显著或结果混杂。我们的研究表明,需要进行更大规模、更高质量的研究,特别是在长期护理和门诊护理环境中。