• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

我们能否预测冲击波碎石术后“石街”形成时干预治疗的必要性?

Can we predict the need for intervention in steinstrasse following shock wave lithotripsy?

作者信息

Phukan Chandan, Nirmal T J, Wann Cornerstone V, Chandrasingh J, Kumar Santosh, Kekre Nitin S, Devasia Antony

机构信息

Department of Urology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.

出版信息

Urol Ann. 2017 Jan-Mar;9(1):51-54. doi: 10.4103/0974-7796.198870.

DOI:10.4103/0974-7796.198870
PMID:28216930
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5308039/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Steinstrasse (SS) is a known complication of shock wave lithotripsy (SWL). Although the majority of SS clears spontaneously, about 6% require intervention. This study was carried out to identify the factors that determine the need for intervention in SS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective study of all patients who developed steinstrasse following SWL at our center. They were divided into two groups: a) Those cleared spontaneously and b) Those required intervention. The two groups were compared with regard to demographic profile, stone factors and factors related to steinstrasse.

RESULTS

Out of 2436 cases of SWL, 89 (3%) formed steinstrasse. The majority of the patients (35%) who required intervention had stone sizes of 10-14 mm. Coptcoat type III steinstrasse required significantly more interventions for clearance ( = 0.001). The site and the size of the SS was not a predictor of intervention for SS.

CONCLUSIONS

Early intervention is warranted in patients with steinstrasse where the lead fragment is >5 mm (Coptcoat type III).

摘要

引言

石街是冲击波碎石术(SWL)的一种已知并发症。尽管大多数石街会自行清除,但约6%的患者需要干预。本研究旨在确定决定石街干预需求的因素。

材料与方法

这是一项对在我们中心接受SWL后出现石街的所有患者进行的回顾性研究。他们被分为两组:a)自行清除的患者和b)需要干预的患者。比较两组患者的人口统计学特征、结石因素和与石街相关的因素。

结果

在2436例SWL病例中,89例(3%)形成了石街。大多数需要干预的患者(35%)结石大小为10 - 14毫米。Ⅲ型Copctcoat石街清除所需的干预显著更多( = 0.001)。石街的部位和大小不是石街干预的预测因素。

结论

对于石街中先导碎片>5毫米(Ⅲ型Copctcoat)的患者,有必要进行早期干预。

相似文献

1
Can we predict the need for intervention in steinstrasse following shock wave lithotripsy?我们能否预测冲击波碎石术后“石街”形成时干预治疗的必要性?
Urol Ann. 2017 Jan-Mar;9(1):51-54. doi: 10.4103/0974-7796.198870.
2
Predictive factors and treatment outcomes of Steinstrasse following shock wave lithotripsy for ureteral calculi: A Bayesian regression model analysis.冲击波碎石术治疗输尿管结石后 Steinstrasse 的预测因素和治疗结果:贝叶斯回归模型分析。
Investig Clin Urol. 2018 Mar;59(2):112-118. doi: 10.4111/icu.2018.59.2.112. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
3
Does ureteral stenting prior to shock wave lithotripsy influence the need for intervention in steinstrasse and related complications?冲击波碎石术前放置输尿管支架是否会影响对“石街”进行干预的必要性及相关并发症?
Urol Int. 2009;83(2):222-5. doi: 10.1159/000230028. Epub 2009 Sep 10.
4
Risk factors for formation of steinstrasse after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for pediatric renal calculi: a multivariate analysis model.小儿肾结石体外冲击波碎石术后形成石街的危险因素:多因素分析模型
Int Urol Nephrol. 2015 Apr;47(4):573-7. doi: 10.1007/s11255-015-0938-8. Epub 2015 Mar 4.
5
Treatment of steinstrasse by transureteral lithotripsy.经输尿管碎石术治疗“石街”。
Urol J. 2008 Spring;5(2):89-93.
6
Large spontaneous steinstrasse: Our experience and management issues in tertiary care centre.巨大自发性 Steinstrasse:我们在三级护理中心的经验和管理问题。
Urologia. 2022 May;89(2):226-230. doi: 10.1177/03915603211001174. Epub 2021 Mar 14.
7
Risk factors for the formation of a steinstrasse after shock wave lithotripsy.冲击波碎石术后形成石街的危险因素。
Urol Int. 2005;74(4):323-5. doi: 10.1159/000084431.
8
Predictive factors and management of steinstrasse after shock wave lithotripsy in pediatric urolithiasis--a multivariate analysis study.小儿尿石症冲击波碎石术后石街的预测因素及处理--多因素分析研究。
Urology. 2012 Nov;80(5):1127-31. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.06.043. Epub 2012 Sep 19.
9
The role of ureteral stent placement in the prevention of Steinstrasse.输尿管支架置入在预防“铸型结石”中的作用。
J Endourol. 1999 Apr;13(3):151-5. doi: 10.1089/end.1999.13.151.
10
Risk factors for the formation of a steinstrasse after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a statistical model.体外冲击波碎石术后形成“石街”的危险因素:一种统计模型
J Urol. 2002 Mar;167(3):1239-42.

引用本文的文献

1
Sotn ureteroscope system with vacuum suctioning device for treating complicated steinstrasse: a case series.带有真空抽吸装置的Sotn输尿管镜系统治疗复杂性铸型结石:病例系列
Front Surg. 2025 May 7;12:1520011. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1520011. eCollection 2025.
2
Scoping Review of Experimental and Clinical Evidence and Its Influence on Development of the Suction Ureteral Access Sheath.经皮肾镜输尿管鞘的实验与临床证据综述及其对其发展的影响
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 May 16;14(10):1034. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14101034.
3
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus laser lithotripsy in the treatment of post-SWL steinstrasse: a randomized comparative study.体外冲击波碎石术与激光碎石术治疗体外冲击波碎石术后石街的随机对照研究
World J Urol. 2024 May 22;42(1):345. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-05046-6.
4
Ureteral wall thickness as a predictor for non-invasive treatment success for steinstrasse. Can we save time?输尿管壁厚度作为 Steinstrasse 非侵入性治疗成功的预测指标。我们能否节省时间?
World J Urol. 2024 Mar 13;42(1):151. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-04874-w.
5
Grooved vs smooth ureteric stent before extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy: Single-blind randomised clinical trial.体外冲击波碎石术前带槽输尿管支架与光滑输尿管支架的比较:单盲随机临床试验
Arab J Urol. 2021 Dec 7;20(1):41-48. doi: 10.1080/2090598X.2021.2004502. eCollection 2022.
6
How to maximize the efficacy of shockwave lithotripsy.如何使冲击波碎石术的疗效最大化。
Turk J Urol. 2020 Nov;46(Supp. 1):S19-S26. doi: 10.5152/tud.2020.20441. Epub 2020 Oct 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Does ureteral stenting matter for stone size? A retrospectıve analyses of 1361 extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy patients.输尿管支架置入对结石大小有影响吗?对1361例体外冲击波碎石患者的回顾性分析。
Cent European J Urol. 2015;68(3):358-64. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2015.611. Epub 2015 Oct 15.
2
The efficacy of tamsulosin therapy after extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy for ureteric calculi: A prospective randomised, controlled study.坦索罗辛治疗输尿管结石体外冲击波碎石术后的疗效:一项前瞻性随机对照研究。
Arab J Urol. 2013 Dec;11(4):398-404. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2013.08.013. Epub 2013 Sep 29.
3
[Shock wave lithotripsy in Germany: Results of a nationwide survey].[德国的冲击波碎石术:一项全国性调查的结果]
Urologe A. 2015 Sep;54(9):1277-82. doi: 10.1007/s00120-015-3920-2.
4
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones.体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)与经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)或逆行肾内手术(RIRS)治疗肾结石的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Nov 24(11):CD007044. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007044.pub3.
5
Shock wave lithotripsy: the new phoenix?冲击波碎石术:新的希望?
World J Urol. 2015 Feb;33(2):213-21. doi: 10.1007/s00345-014-1369-3. Epub 2014 Aug 1.
6
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: An opinion on its future.体外冲击波碎石术:对其未来的看法。
Indian J Urol. 2014 Jan;30(1):73-9. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.124211.
7
Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for upper tract urolithiasis.体外冲击波碎石术治疗上尿路结石。
Curr Opin Urol. 2014 Mar;24(2):168-72. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000024.
8
Does ureteral stenting prior to shock wave lithotripsy influence the need for intervention in steinstrasse and related complications?冲击波碎石术前放置输尿管支架是否会影响对“石街”进行干预的必要性及相关并发症?
Urol Int. 2009;83(2):222-5. doi: 10.1159/000230028. Epub 2009 Sep 10.
9
Is there a role for tamsulosin in shock wave lithotripsy for renal and ureteral calculi?坦索罗辛在肾和输尿管结石的冲击波碎石术中是否有作用?
J Urol. 2007 Jun;177(6):2185-8. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.01.160.
10
Steinstrasse after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy: aetiology, prevention and management.体外冲击波碎石术后的石街:病因、预防及处理
BJU Int. 2001 Nov;88(7):675-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-4096.2001.02435.x.