Inouye Jillian, Li Dongmei, Davis James, Arakaki Richard
School of Nursing, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV (JI).
Hawaii J Med Public Health. 2015 Nov;74(11):360-8.
Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders are twice as likely to be diagnosed with type 2 diabetes compared to Caucasians. The objective was to determine the effect of cognitive behavioral therapy on quality of life, general health perceptions, depressive symptoms, and glycemia in Asians and Pacific Islanders with type 2 diabetes. The design was a randomized controlled clinical trial comparing cognitive behavioral therapy to diabetes education and support for six weekly sessions. Participants were recruited from two endocrinology practices; 207 were enrolled. The cognitive behavioral therapy group was provided self-management tools which included biofeedback, breathing exercises, and stress relievers, while the diabetes education and support group included diabetes education and group discussions. Assessments of psychosocial and clinical outcomes were obtained before and after sessions and 12 months PostSession. Differences between the two groups were examined using linear mixed-effects models with linear contrasts. The cognitive behavioral therapy group had improved depressive symptom scores from PreSession to EndSession compared to the diabetes education and support group (P < .03), but the improvement did not extend to 12 months PostSession. Similar results were observed with misguided support scores in the Multidimensional Diabetes Questionnaire (P < .03) and susceptibility in health beliefs (P < .01), but no significant differences in HbA1c improvement were found between the two groups. Both interventions improved outcomes from baseline but were not sustained for 1 year.
与白种人相比,亚裔美国人和太平洋岛民被诊断出患有2型糖尿病的可能性是其两倍。目的是确定认知行为疗法对患有2型糖尿病的亚裔和太平洋岛民的生活质量、总体健康认知、抑郁症状和血糖的影响。该设计是一项随机对照临床试验,将认知行为疗法与糖尿病教育及支持进行比较,为期六周,每周一次。参与者从两家内分泌科招募;共招募了207人。认知行为疗法组提供了自我管理工具,包括生物反馈、呼吸练习和压力缓解方法,而糖尿病教育及支持组包括糖尿病教育和小组讨论。在疗程前后以及疗程结束后12个月对心理社会和临床结果进行评估。使用带有线性对比的线性混合效应模型检查两组之间的差异。与糖尿病教育及支持组相比,认知行为疗法组从疗程开始到疗程结束时抑郁症状评分有所改善(P < 0.03),但这种改善在疗程结束后12个月并未持续。在多维糖尿病问卷中的误导性支持评分(P < 0.03)和健康信念易感性(P < 0.01)方面也观察到了类似结果,但两组之间糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)改善情况没有显著差异。两种干预措施都使结果从基线有所改善,但未持续1年。