Suppr超能文献

基于噻替派的高剂量疗法用于淋巴瘤自体干细胞移植:欧洲血液与骨髓移植组的一项回顾性研究

Thiotepa-based high-dose therapy for autologous stem cell transplantation in lymphoma: a retrospective study from the EBMT.

作者信息

Sellner L, Boumendil A, Finel H, Choquet S, de Rosa G, Falzetti F, Scime R, Kobbe G, Ferrara F, Delmer A, Sayer H, Amorim S, Bouabdallah R, Finke J, Salles G, Yakoub-Agha I, Faber E, Nicolas-Virelizier E, Facchini L, Vallisa D, Zuffa E, Sureda A, Dreger P

机构信息

Department of Medicine V, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

Lymphoma Working Party, European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Paris, France.

出版信息

Bone Marrow Transplant. 2016 Feb;51(2):212-218. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2015.273. Epub 2015 Nov 16.

Abstract

Clinical information about thiotepa-based autologous stem cell transplantation (auto-SCT) outside the primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) field is sparse. In this registry-based retrospective study, we evaluated potential risks and benefits of thiotepa-based preparative regimens compared with BEAM (carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan) in auto-SCT for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL, excluding PCNSL), follicular lymphoma (FL) or Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). A total of 14 544 patients (589 thiotepa and 13 955 BEAM) met the eligibility criteria, and 535 thiotepa- and 1031 BEAM-treated patients were matched in a 1:2 ratio for final comparison. No significant differences between thiotepa and BEAM groups for any survival end point were identified in the whole sample or disease entity subsets. For a more detailed analysis, 47 TEAM (thiotepa, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan)-treated patients were compared with 75 matched BEAM patients with additional collection of toxicity data. Again, there were no significant differences between the two groups for any survival end point. In addition, the frequency of common infectious and non-infectious complications including secondary malignancies was comparable between TEAM and BEAM. These results indicate that thiotepa-based high-dose therapy might be a valuable alternative to BEAM in DLBCL, HL and FL. Further evaluation by prospective clinical trials is warranted.

摘要

关于基于噻替派的自体干细胞移植(auto-SCT)在原发性中枢神经系统淋巴瘤(PCNSL)领域之外的临床信息很少。在这项基于登记的回顾性研究中,我们评估了在弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL,不包括PCNSL)、滤泡性淋巴瘤(FL)或霍奇金淋巴瘤(HL)的auto-SCT中,与BEAM(卡莫司汀、依托泊苷、阿糖胞苷、美法仑)相比,基于噻替派的预处理方案的潜在风险和益处。共有14544例患者(589例使用噻替派和13955例使用BEAM)符合纳入标准,535例接受噻替派治疗和1031例接受BEAM治疗的患者以1:2的比例进行匹配以进行最终比较。在整个样本或疾病实体亚组中,噻替派组和BEAM组在任何生存终点方面均未发现显著差异。为了进行更详细的分析,将47例接受TEAM(噻替派、依托泊苷、阿糖胞苷、美法仑)治疗的患者与75例匹配的BEAM患者进行比较,并额外收集毒性数据。同样,两组在任何生存终点方面均无显著差异。此外,TEAM组和BEAM组在包括继发性恶性肿瘤在内的常见感染性和非感染性并发症的发生率方面具有可比性。这些结果表明,在DLBCL、HL和FL中,基于噻替派的高剂量治疗可能是BEAM的一种有价值的替代方案。有必要通过前瞻性临床试验进行进一步评估。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验