• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估改良的BeEAM(苯达莫司汀、依托泊苷、阿糖胞苷、美法仑)方案作为复发或难治性淋巴瘤自体干细胞移植预处理方案的疗效:来自一个发展中国家两个中心的经验。

Evaluating the Efficacy of Modified BeEAM(Bendamustine, Etoposide, Cytarabine, Melphalan) Regimen as Conditioning for Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Relapsed or Refractory Lymphoma: An Experience from Two Centers of a Developing Country.

作者信息

Ramzi Mani, Vafaie Elaheh, Haghighinejad Hourvash, Imran Hashim

机构信息

Hematology Research Center and Department of Bone Marrow Transplantation, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.

Medical School, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.

出版信息

Int J Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Res. 2023 Apr 1;17(2):106-113. doi: 10.18502/ijhoscr.v17i2.12647.

DOI:10.18502/ijhoscr.v17i2.12647
PMID:37637764
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10452946/
Abstract

High-dose chemotherapy followed by Autologous SCT (stem cell transplantation) is a treatment of choice for relapsed and refractory lymphoma. Due to cost, toxicity, and shortage of Carmustine, we decided to conduct a phase 2 clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Bendamustine instead of Carmustine in a previously used BEAM-like protocol. :102 patients (median age,37) with Hodgkin(n=54) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma(n=48) were recruited and transplanted in two centers. After stem cell harvesting, a modified BeEAM regimen was administered to all the patients. Overall survival and disease-free survival (DFS) at two years were calculated as the study's primary endpoints. Neutrophil and platelet recovery were observed after a median of 12 and 13 days, and all the patients were engrafted. Fever was observed in 25(24.5%) with only two documented infections. The only grade III toxicities were mucositis (20%) and nausea (15.6%). No transplant-related mortality (TRM) was observed after 100 days. After a median follow-up of 37(range 25-48) months, 68(66.6%) patients were in complete remission while 21 patients were in partial response, and 16 patients (15.6%) developed progressive disease, among which 13 (12.7%) had died. The OS at two years was (89 of 102, 87.3%), and the DFS rate was 68 of 102(66.7%). Our study showed that modified BeEAM is a safe, effective, and feasible conditioning regimen for ASCT in lymphoma instead of the BEAM regimen.

摘要

大剂量化疗后进行自体干细胞移植(SCT)是复发难治性淋巴瘤的首选治疗方法。由于卡莫司汀的成本、毒性以及供应短缺,我们决定开展一项2期临床试验,以评估在先前使用的类似BEAM方案中用苯达莫司汀替代卡莫司汀的安全性和有效性。102例患者(中位年龄37岁),其中霍奇金淋巴瘤患者54例,非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者48例,在两个中心招募并接受移植。在采集干细胞后,对所有患者采用改良的BeEAM方案。计算两年时的总生存率和无病生存率(DFS)作为研究的主要终点。中性粒细胞和血小板恢复的中位时间分别为12天和13天,所有患者均实现造血重建。25例(24.5%)患者出现发热,仅有2例有记录的感染。仅有的3级毒性反应为粘膜炎(20%)和恶心(15.6%)。100天后未观察到移植相关死亡率(TRM)。中位随访37(范围25 - 48)个月后,68例(66.6%)患者完全缓解,21例部分缓解,16例(15.6%)疾病进展,其中13例(12.7%)死亡。两年时的总生存率为102例中的89例(87.3%),DFS率为102例中的68例(66.7%)。我们的研究表明,改良的BeEAM方案对于淋巴瘤自体干细胞移植而言,是一种安全、有效且可行的预处理方案,可替代BEAM方案。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f5a/10452946/d26a85ffcce9/IJHOSCR-17-106-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f5a/10452946/191b783b16b6/IJHOSCR-17-106-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f5a/10452946/d26a85ffcce9/IJHOSCR-17-106-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f5a/10452946/191b783b16b6/IJHOSCR-17-106-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f5a/10452946/d26a85ffcce9/IJHOSCR-17-106-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluating the Efficacy of Modified BeEAM(Bendamustine, Etoposide, Cytarabine, Melphalan) Regimen as Conditioning for Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Relapsed or Refractory Lymphoma: An Experience from Two Centers of a Developing Country.评估改良的BeEAM(苯达莫司汀、依托泊苷、阿糖胞苷、美法仑)方案作为复发或难治性淋巴瘤自体干细胞移植预处理方案的疗效:来自一个发展中国家两个中心的经验。
Int J Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Res. 2023 Apr 1;17(2):106-113. doi: 10.18502/ijhoscr.v17i2.12647.
2
BeEAM (Bendamustine, Etoposide, Cytarabine, Melphalan) Versus BEAM (Carmustine, Etoposide, Cytarabine, Melphalan) as Conditioning Regimen Before Autologous Haematopoietic Cell Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.苯达莫司汀、依托泊苷、阿糖胞苷、美法仑(BeEAM)与卡莫司汀、依托泊苷、阿糖胞苷、美法仑(BEAM)作为自体造血干细胞移植前的预处理方案:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cell Transplant. 2023 Jan-Dec;32:9636897231179364. doi: 10.1177/09636897231179364.
3
A retrospective, matched paired analysis comparing bendamustine containing BeEAM versus BEAM conditioning regimen: results from a single center experience.一项比较含苯达莫司汀的BeEAM与BEAM预处理方案的回顾性配对分析:来自单中心经验的结果。
Leuk Lymphoma. 2018 Nov;59(11):2580-2587. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2017.1403019. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
4
Clinical and safety outcomes of BeEAM (Bendamustine, Etoposide, Cytarabine, Melphalan) versus CEM (Carboplatin, Etoposide, Melphalan) in lymphoma patients as a conditioning regimen before autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation.BeEAM(苯达莫司汀、依托泊苷、阿糖胞苷、美法仑)与 CEM(卡铂、依托泊苷、美法仑)作为淋巴瘤患者自体造血细胞移植前的预处理方案的临床和安全性结果。
BMC Cancer. 2024 Aug 13;24(1):1002. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12694-9.
5
Comparable safety profile of BeEAM (bendamustine, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan) and BEAM (carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan) as conditioning before autologous haematopoietic cell transplantation.在自体造血细胞移植前作为预处理方案时,苯达莫司汀、依托泊苷、阿糖胞苷、美法仑(BeEAM)与卡莫司汀、依托泊苷、阿糖胞苷、美法仑(BEAM)具有相似的安全性。
Contemp Oncol (Pozn). 2018;22(2):113-117. doi: 10.5114/wo.2018.77046. Epub 2018 Jun 30.
6
Z-BeEAM (Ibritumomab tiuxetan, Bendamustine, Etoposide, Cytarabine, Melphalan) before autologous stem cell transplantation is safe and efficient for refractory large B-cell lymphoma.Z- 比弗单抗替伊莫单抗(利妥昔单抗)、苯达莫司汀、依托泊苷、阿糖胞苷、美法仑)联合自体干细胞移植治疗复发/难治性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤安全有效。
Exp Hematol Oncol. 2015 Jul 4;4:18. doi: 10.1186/s40164-015-0013-2. eCollection 2015.
7
BeEAM (bendamustine, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan) before autologous stem cell transplantation is safe and effective for resistant/relapsed lymphoma patients.BeEAM(苯达莫司汀、依托泊苷、阿糖胞苷、美法仑)在自体造血干细胞移植前对耐药/复发的淋巴瘤患者安全且有效。
Blood. 2011 Sep 22;118(12):3419-25. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-04-351924. Epub 2011 Aug 3.
8
LEAM vs. BEAM vs. CLV Conditioning Regimen for Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Malignant Lymphomas. Retrospective Comparison of Toxicity and Efficacy on 222 Patients in the First 100 Days After Transplant, On Behalf of the Romanian Society for Bone Marrow Transplantation.用于恶性淋巴瘤自体干细胞移植的LEAM方案、BEAM方案与CLV预处理方案对比:代表罗马尼亚骨髓移植学会对222例患者移植后前100天毒性和疗效的回顾性比较
Front Oncol. 2019 Sep 10;9:892. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00892. eCollection 2019.
9
Bendamustine-EAM versus BEAM regimen in patients with mantle cell lymphoma undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation in the frontline setting: a multicenter retrospective study from Lymphoma Study Association (LYSA) centers.苯达莫司汀 - EAM方案与BEAM方案用于一线接受自体干细胞移植的套细胞淋巴瘤患者的对比:一项来自淋巴瘤研究协会(LYSA)中心的多中心回顾性研究
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2020 Jun;55(6):1076-1084. doi: 10.1038/s41409-020-0783-y. Epub 2020 Jan 17.
10
BeEAM vs. BEAM: evaluating conditioning regimens for autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL.BeEAM 方案与 BEAM 方案:评价自体造血干细胞移植治疗复发或难治性弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤患者的预处理方案。
Ann Hematol. 2024 Jul;103(7):2455-2462. doi: 10.1007/s00277-024-05813-w. Epub 2024 May 29.

本文引用的文献

1
BeEAM conditioning regimen is a safe, efficacious and economical alternative to BEAM chemotherapy.BeEAM 预处理方案是替代 BEAM 化疗的一种安全、有效且经济的选择。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jul 7;11(1):14071. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-93516-x.
2
Comparable safety profile of BeEAM (bendamustine, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan) and BEAM (carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan) as conditioning before autologous haematopoietic cell transplantation.在自体造血细胞移植前作为预处理方案时,苯达莫司汀、依托泊苷、阿糖胞苷、美法仑(BeEAM)与卡莫司汀、依托泊苷、阿糖胞苷、美法仑(BEAM)具有相似的安全性。
Contemp Oncol (Pozn). 2018;22(2):113-117. doi: 10.5114/wo.2018.77046. Epub 2018 Jun 30.
3
High-dose Bendamustine-EAM followed by autologous stem cell rescue results in long-term remission rates in lymphoma patients, without renal toxicity.
高剂量苯达莫司汀联合 EAM 方案继以自体干细胞解救治疗可使淋巴瘤患者获得长期缓解,且无肾毒性。
Eur J Haematol. 2018 Sep;101(3):326-331. doi: 10.1111/ejh.13102. Epub 2018 Aug 3.
4
Bendamustine-based conditioning prior to autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT): Results of a French multicenter study of 474 patients from LYmphoma Study Association (LYSA) centers.苯达莫司汀预处理后自体造血干细胞移植(ASCT):LYmphoma Study Association(LYSA)中心 474 例患者的法国多中心研究结果。
Am J Hematol. 2018 Jun;93(6):729-735. doi: 10.1002/ajh.25077. Epub 2018 Mar 14.
5
A retrospective, matched paired analysis comparing bendamustine containing BeEAM versus BEAM conditioning regimen: results from a single center experience.一项比较含苯达莫司汀的BeEAM与BEAM预处理方案的回顾性配对分析:来自单中心经验的结果。
Leuk Lymphoma. 2018 Nov;59(11):2580-2587. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2017.1403019. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
6
High dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation in relapsed or refractory Hodgkin lymphoma: Emerging questions, newer agents, and changing paradigm.高剂量化疗及自体干细胞移植治疗复发或难治性霍奇金淋巴瘤:新出现的问题、新型药物及不断变化的模式
Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Ther. 2017 Dec;10(4):272-276. doi: 10.1016/j.hemonc.2017.05.010. Epub 2017 Jun 13.
7
BeEAM conditioning with bendamustine-replacing BCNU before autologous transplantation is safe and effective in lymphoma patients.在自体移植前使用苯达莫司汀替代卡氮芥进行硼替佐米(BeEAM)预处理,对淋巴瘤患者是安全有效的。
Ann Hematol. 2017 Mar;96(3):421-429. doi: 10.1007/s00277-016-2900-y. Epub 2016 Dec 24.
8
Thiotepa-based high-dose therapy for autologous stem cell transplantation in lymphoma: a retrospective study from the EBMT.基于噻替派的高剂量疗法用于淋巴瘤自体干细胞移植:欧洲血液与骨髓移植组的一项回顾性研究
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2016 Feb;51(2):212-218. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2015.273. Epub 2015 Nov 16.
9
Bendamustine-based conditioning for non-Hodgkin lymphoma autologous transplantation: an increasing risk of renal toxicity.基于苯达莫司汀的预处理方案用于非霍奇金淋巴瘤自体移植:肾毒性风险增加
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2016 Feb;51(2):319-21. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2015.257. Epub 2015 Nov 2.
10
Bendamustine, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan, and autologous stem cell rescue produce a 72% 3-year PFS in resistant lymphoma.苯达莫司汀、依托泊苷、阿糖胞苷、美法仑及自体干细胞救援在难治性淋巴瘤中产生72%的3年无进展生存率。
Blood. 2014 Nov 6;124(19):3029-31. doi: 10.1182/blood-2014-08-596668.