Chou Ann F, Rose Danielle E, Farmer Melissa, Canelo Ismelda, Yano Elizabeth M
*University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK †VA Greater Los Angeles HSR&D Center for the Study of Innovation, Implementation, and Policy, North Hills, CA.
Med Care. 2015 Dec;53(12):1040-9. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000449.
Preventive service delivery, including cancer screenings, continues to pose a challenge to quality improvement efforts. Although many studies have focused on person-level characteristics associated with screening, less is known about organizational influences on cancer screening.
This study aims to understand the association between organizational factors and adherence to cancer screenings.
This study employed a cross-sectional design using organizational-level, patient-level, and area-level data. Dependent variables included breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening. Organizational factors describing resource sufficiency were constructed using factor analyses from a survey of 250 Veterans Affairs primary care directors. We conducted random-effects logistic regression analyses, modeling cancer screening as a function of organizational factors, controlling for patient-level and area-level factors.
Overall, 87% of the patients received mammograms, 92% received cervical and 78% had colorectal screening. Quality improvement orientation increased the odds of cervical [odds ratio (OR): 1.27; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.03-1.57] and colorectal cancer screening (OR: 1.10; 95% CI, 1.00-1.20). Authority in determining primary care components increased the odds of mammography screening (OR: 1.23; 95% CI, 1.03-1.51). Sufficiency in clinical staffing increased the odds of mammography and cervical cancer screenings. Several patient-level factors, serving as control variables, were associated with achievement of screenings.
Resource sufficiency led to increased odds of screening possibly because they promote excellence in patient care by conveying organizational goals and facilitate goal achievement with resources. Complementary to patient-level factors, our findings identified organizational processes associated with better performance, which offer concrete strategies in which facilities can evaluate their capabilities to implement best practices to foster and sustain a culture of quality care.
包括癌症筛查在内的预防性服务提供,仍然是质量改进工作面临的一项挑战。尽管许多研究聚焦于与筛查相关的个体层面特征,但对于组织对癌症筛查的影响了解较少。
本研究旨在了解组织因素与癌症筛查依从性之间的关联。
本研究采用横断面设计,使用组织层面、患者层面和地区层面的数据。因变量包括乳腺癌、宫颈癌和结直肠癌筛查。描述资源充足性的组织因素是通过对250名退伍军人事务初级保健主任的调查进行因子分析构建的。我们进行了随机效应逻辑回归分析,将癌症筛查建模为组织因素的函数,并控制患者层面和地区层面的因素。
总体而言,87%的患者接受了乳房X光检查,92%接受了宫颈癌筛查,78%进行了结直肠癌筛查。质量改进导向增加了宫颈癌[优势比(OR):1.27;95%置信区间(CI),1.03 - 1.57]和结直肠癌筛查的几率(OR:1.10;95%CI,1.00 - 1.20)。在确定初级保健组成部分方面的自主权增加了乳房X光检查筛查的几率(OR:1.23;95%CI,1.03 - 1.51)。临床人员配备充足增加了乳房X光检查和宫颈癌筛查的几率。作为控制变量的几个患者层面因素与筛查的完成情况相关。
资源充足性导致筛查几率增加,可能是因为它们通过传达组织目标促进了优质的患者护理,并利用资源促进了目标的实现。作为患者层面因素的补充,我们的研究结果确定了与更好绩效相关的组织流程,这为医疗机构评估其实施最佳实践以培育和维持优质护理文化的能力提供了具体策略。