Bond Meaghan M, Richards-Kortum Rebecca R
From the Department of Bioengineering, Rice University, Houston, TX.
Am J Clin Pathol. 2015 Dec;144(6):885-94. doi: 10.1309/AJCP1L7DKMPCHPEH.
Blood obtained via fingerprick is commonly used in point-of-care assays, but few studies have assessed variability in parameters obtained from successive drops of fingerprick blood, which may cause problems for clinical decision making and for assessing accuracy of point-of-care tests.
We used a hematology analyzer to analyze the hemoglobin concentration, total WBC count, three-part WBC differential, and platelet count in six successive drops of blood collected from one fingerprick from each of 11 donors, and we used a hemoglobinometer to measure the hemoglobin concentration of 10 drops of fingerprick blood from each of 7 donors.
The average percent coefficient of variation (CV) for successive drops of fingerprick blood was higher by up to 3.4 times for hemoglobin, 5.7 times for WBC count, 3 times for lymphocyte count, 7.7 times for granulocyte count, and 4 times for platelets than in venous controls measured using a hematology analyzer. The average percent CV for fingerprick blood was up to 5 times higher for hemoglobin than venous blood measured using a point-of-care hemoglobinometer. Fluctuations in blood parameters with increasing volume of fingerprick blood are within instrument variability for volumes equal to or greater than 60 to 100 μL.
These data suggest caution when using measurements from a single drop of fingerprick blood.
通过手指采血获得的血液常用于即时检验,但很少有研究评估连续几滴手指采血所获得参数的变异性,这可能会给临床决策和即时检验准确性评估带来问题。
我们使用血液分析仪分析了从11名献血者的每个手指采血的连续6滴血中的血红蛋白浓度、白细胞总数、白细胞三分群以及血小板计数,并使用血红蛋白仪测量了7名献血者的每10滴手指采血的血红蛋白浓度。
与使用血液分析仪测量的静脉血对照相比,手指采血连续几滴的平均变异系数百分比(CV),血红蛋白高达3.4倍,白细胞计数高达5.7倍,淋巴细胞计数高达3倍,粒细胞计数高达7.7倍,血小板高达4倍。使用即时血红蛋白仪测量时,手指采血的血红蛋白平均CV百分比比静脉血高出多达5倍。当手指采血量等于或大于60至100μL时,血液参数随手指采血量增加的波动在仪器变异性范围内。
这些数据表明,使用单滴手指采血测量结果时需谨慎。