用于直接后牙修复的高填料可流动复合树脂的36个月临床评估。

Thirty-six month clinical evaluation of a highly filled flowable composite for direct posterior restorations.

作者信息

Kitasako Y, Sadr A, Burrow M F, Tagami J

机构信息

Cariology and Operative Dentistry, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.

Department of Restorative Dentistry, Associate Director in Biomimetics Biomaterials Biophotonics and Technology Laboratory, School of Dentistry, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.

出版信息

Aust Dent J. 2016 Sep;61(3):366-73. doi: 10.1111/adj.12387.

DOI:10.1111/adj.12387

PMID:26573239

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this randomized controlled study was to evaluate the clinical performance of a highly filled flowable composite compared to a conventional paste-type composite in direct posterior restorations after 36 months.

METHODS

A total of 58 mid-size to extensive posterior composite restorations were randomly placed in 32 patients, mean age of 43.9 years (range 25-76), using either a conventional composite Estelite Sigma Quick (Conventional) or a highly filled flowable composite G-aenial Universal Flo with a two-step self-etch adhesive. The restorations were evaluated after placement (baseline) and at 6, 12, 24 and 36 months according to the FDI criteria.

RESULTS

At the 36-month follow-up, 42 restorations were evaluated in 21 patients. After 36 months, the difference between highly filled flowable and conventional restorations was not statistically significant with respect to all evaluation parameters (p < 0.05). No secondary caries was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The highly filled flowable composite showed a comparable clinical effectiveness as the conventional paste composite in posterior restorations over 36 months.

摘要

背景

本随机对照研究的目的是评估高度填充可流动复合树脂与传统糊剂型复合树脂在直接后牙修复36个月后的临床性能。

方法

使用传统复合树脂Estelite Sigma Quick（传统组）或高度填充可流动复合树脂G-aenial Universal Flo与两步自酸蚀粘结剂，将总共58个中到大范围的后牙复合树脂修复体随机放置于32例患者（平均年龄43.9岁，范围25 - 76岁）口中。修复体在放置后（基线）以及6、12、24和36个月时根据FDI标准进行评估。