Dental School, Faculty of Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Institute of Odontology, Faculty of Health Science, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Dent Mater. 2014 Sep;30(9):e245-51. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2014.05.028. Epub 2014 Jun 21.
The objective of this randomized controlled prospective clinical trial was to evaluate the efficacy of a flowable resin composite (SDR) bulk fill technique in posterior restorations and to compare it intraindividually with a conventional 2 mm resin composite curing technique in a 3-year follow up.
Thirty-eight pairs Class II and 15 pairs Class I restorations were placed in 38 patients with a mean age of 55.3 years (range 32-87). Each patient received at random at least two, as similar as possible, Class II or Class I restorations of two restorative techniques. In all cavities a single step self-etch adhesive (Xeno V) was applied. In one of the cavities of each pair, a flowable resin composite (SDR) was placed, in bulk increments up to 4 mm as needed to fill the cavity 2 mm short of the occlusal cavosurface. The occlusal part was completed with a nano-hybrid resin composite (Ceram X mono) layer. In the second cavity, the hybrid resin composite was placed in 2 mm increments. The restorations were evaluated using slightly modified USPHS criteria at baseline and then yearly during 3 years. Caries risk and parafunctional habits of the participants were estimated.
After three years, 76 Class II and 28 Class I restorations could be observed. One molar resin composite-only tooth showed post-operative sensitivity during 3 weeks for temperature changes and occlusal forces. Two failed Class II molar restorations in the resin composite-only group were observed during the first year, one cusp fracture and one resin composite fracture. An annual failure rate of 1.3% was found for the resin composite only restorations and of 0% in the bulk-filled restorations (n.s.). Ten participants were estimated as having high caries risk and eleven showed active bruxing habits.
The 4 mm bulk-fill technique with the flowable resin composite SDR showed highly clinical effectiveness, which was comparable during the 3-year follow-up with the 2mm resin composite layering technique.
本随机对照前瞻性临床试验的目的是评估一种流动树脂复合材料(SDR)的大块填充技术在后牙修复中的疗效,并在 3 年的随访中对其与传统的 2 毫米树脂复合材料固化技术进行个体内比较。
38 对 II 类和 15 对 I 类修复体放置在 38 名平均年龄为 55.3 岁(范围 32-87 岁)的患者中。每位患者至少随机接受两种尽可能相似的两种修复技术的 II 类或 I 类修复体。所有窝洞均应用一步自酸蚀粘结剂(Xeno V)。在每对窝洞的其中一个窝洞中,放置一种流动树脂复合材料(SDR),按需以 4mm 的大块增量填充,直到窝洞短于咬合面 2mm。用纳米混合树脂复合材料(Ceram X mono)层完成咬合部分。在第二个窝洞中,将混合树脂复合材料分层放置 2mm。在基线和 3 年内每年使用稍作修改的 USPHS 标准评估修复体。评估参与者的龋病风险和功能紊乱习惯。
3 年后,可观察到 76 个 II 类和 28 个 I 类修复体。一颗磨牙树脂复合材料仅牙齿在 3 周内对温度变化和咬合力出现术后敏感。在树脂复合材料组中,第一年观察到 2 个失败的 II 类磨牙修复体,一个牙尖折裂,一个树脂复合材料折裂。仅树脂复合材料修复体的年失效率为 1.3%,大块填充修复体为 0%(无统计学意义)。估计有 10 名参与者具有高龋病风险,11 名参与者有活跃的磨牙习惯。
用流动树脂复合材料 SDR 进行的 4mm 大块填充技术具有高度的临床效果,在 3 年的随访中与 2mm 树脂复合材料分层技术相当。