Zhao Hongfu, He Mingyuan, Cheng Guanghui, Han Dongmei, Wu Ning, Shi Dan, Zhao Zhipeng, Jin Jianxue
Department of Radiation Oncology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130033, China.
Department of Radiation Physics, Elekta China Co. Ltd, Beijing, 100101, China.
Radiat Oncol. 2015 Nov 17;10:231. doi: 10.1186/s13014-015-0531-4.
This study compared VMAT and IMRT plans for intact breast radiotherapy for left sided breast cancer and evaluated the irradiated dose of planning target volume and OARs, especially focusing on heart and coronary artery.
Eleven patients with left sided breast cancer whose breast was relatively smaller (the mean volumes is 296 cc) treated with breast-conserving surgery were prescribed radiotherapy of 50 Gy in 25 fractions using two or four-field step and shoot IMRT (2 or 4-F IMRT), and one or two-arc VMAT (1 or 2-arc VMAT). The 10 Gy electron boost to the tumor bed after delivery of 50 Gy was not included in the analysis. Multiple planning parameters for the PTV and the PRV-OARs were measured and analyzed.
Treatment plans generated using VMAT had better PTV homogeneity than the IMRT plans. For the PRV-OARs, the 1-arc VMAT had significantly higher Dmean and V5 for left lung and heart, and showed worse Dmean for liver, esophagus, spinal cord, contralateral lung and breast. In contrast, the 2-arc VMAT and the 2-F or 4-F IMRT plans showed better results for the PRV-OARs than the 1-arc VMAT. However, for the heart and coronary artery, the 1-arc VMAT showed better V20 and V40 compared with the other plans. Moreover, the 2 F-IMRT had specially advantage on V5 and V20 for heart and V5 for coronary arteries, the 2-F IMRT also showed a greater MU and treatment times. Using the table of quality score to evaluate the plans, we found that 2-F IMRT had the highest scores of 13, followed by the 2-arc VMAT plan (10 points) and 1-arc VMAT plan (8 points), and finally the 4-F IMRT plan (6 points). Moreover, when a dose comparison for heart minus coronary artery was calculated, the V20 and V40 for the rest of heart in all plans were very small and closed, indicating the dose to the coronary artery contributed dramatically to the high dose volumes for the entire heart.
Compared to other plans, the 2-F IMRT plan with fewer monitor units and shorter delivery time is an appropriate technique for left sided breast cancer, which achieved good PTV coverage and sparing of organs at risk besides for the heart and coronary artery.
本研究比较了左侧乳腺癌保乳放疗的容积调强弧形放疗(VMAT)和调强放疗(IMRT)计划,并评估了计划靶区和危及器官的照射剂量,尤其关注心脏和冠状动脉。
11例左侧乳腺癌患者,其乳房相对较小(平均体积为296立方厘米),接受保乳手术后,采用两野或四野静态调强放疗(2野或4野IMRT)及单弧或双弧容积调强弧形放疗(单弧或双弧VMAT)给予25次分割、总剂量50 Gy的放疗。分析未包括50 Gy照射后对瘤床追加的10 Gy电子线照射。测量并分析了计划靶区(PTV)和危及器官计划评估体积(PRV - OARs)的多个计划参数。
容积调强弧形放疗生成的治疗计划比调强放疗计划具有更好的PTV均匀性。对于PRV - OARs,单弧VMAT的左肺及心脏的平均剂量(Dmean)和V5显著更高,而肝脏、食管、脊髓、对侧肺及乳房的Dmean则更差。相比之下,双弧VMAT和2野或4野IMRT计划在PRV - OARs方面比单弧VMAT表现更好。然而,对于心脏和冠状动脉,单弧VMAT与其他计划相比,V20和V40表现更好。此外,2野IMRT在心脏的V5和V20以及冠状动脉的V5方面具有特殊优势,2野IMRT的机器跳数(MU)和治疗时间也更长。使用质量评分表评估计划,我们发现2野IMRT得分最高,为13分,其次是双弧VMAT计划(10分)和单弧VMAT计划(8分),最后是4野IMRT计划(6分)。此外,当计算心脏减去冠状动脉的剂量比较时,所有计划中其余心脏的V20和V40非常小且接近,这表明冠状动脉的剂量对整个心脏的高剂量体积贡献显著。
与其他计划相比,2野IMRT计划机器跳数较少、治疗时间较短,是左侧乳腺癌的合适技术,除心脏和冠状动脉外,该计划能实现良好的PTV覆盖并保护危及器官。