Sipilanyambe Munyinda Nosiku, Michelo Charles, Sichilongo Kwenga
Department of Public Health, Environmental Health Unit, School of Medicine, University of Zambia, Zambia ; Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, University of Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana.
Department of Public Health, Environmental Health Unit, School of Medicine, University of Zambia, Zambia.
J Environ Public Health. 2015;2015:564189. doi: 10.1155/2015/564189. Epub 2015 Oct 22.
In 2000, a Zambian private mining company reintroduced the use of dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT) to control malaria in two districts. From 2000 to 2010, DDT had been applied in homes without any studies conducted to ascertain its fate in the environment. We aimed to quantify the presence of DDT and its metabolites in the soil and water around communities where it was recently used.
We collected superficial soil and water samples from drinking sources of three study areas. DDT was extracted by QuEChERS method and solid phase extraction for soils and water, respectively. Analysis was by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. A revalidated method with limits of detection ranging from 0.034 to 0.04 ppb was used.
Median levels of total DDT were found at 100.4 (IQR 90.9-110) and 725.4 ng/L (IQR 540-774.5) for soils and water, respectively. No DDT above detection limits was detected in the reference area. These results are clinically significant given the persistent characteristics of DDT.
DDT presence in these media suggests possible limitations in the environmental safeguards during IRS. Such occurrence could have potential effects on humans, especially children; hence, there is a need to further examine possible associations between this exposure and humans.
2000年,赞比亚一家私营矿业公司重新引入二氯二苯三氯乙烷(滴滴涕)用于两个地区的疟疾防治。2000年至2010年期间,滴滴涕被应用于家庭,但未进行任何研究以确定其在环境中的归宿。我们旨在量化近期使用滴滴涕的社区周围土壤和水中滴滴涕及其代谢物的含量。
我们从三个研究区域的饮用水源采集了表层土壤和水样。分别采用QuEChERS方法和固相萃取法从土壤和水中提取滴滴涕。通过气相色谱 - 质谱联用仪进行分析。使用了重新验证的方法,检测限范围为0.034至0.04 ppb。
土壤和水中滴滴涕总量的中位数分别为100.4(四分位间距90.9 - 110)和725.4 ng/L(四分位间距540 - 774.5)。在参考区域未检测到高于检测限的滴滴涕。鉴于滴滴涕的持久性,这些结果具有临床意义。
这些介质中存在滴滴涕表明在室内滞留喷洒期间环境保障措施可能存在局限性。这种情况可能对人类,尤其是儿童产生潜在影响;因此,有必要进一步研究这种暴露与人类之间可能存在的关联。