Wang X C, Zhang H J, Wu S G, Yue H Y, Wang J, Li J, Qi G H
College of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China ; Key Laboratory of Feed Biotechnology of Ministry of Agriculture, Feed Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China.
Key Laboratory of Feed Biotechnology of Ministry of Agriculture, Feed Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China.
Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2015 Nov;28(11):1641-8. doi: 10.5713/ajas.15.0181.
This study was conducted to evaluate the effects of various protein sources (soybean meal, SBM; cottonseed protein, CSP; double-zero rapeseed meal, DRM) on the internal quality of refrigerated eggs. A total of 360 laying hens (32 wk of age) were randomly allotted to six treatment groups (five replicates per treatment) and fed diets containing SBM, CSP, or DRM individually or in combination with equal crude protein content (SBM-CSP, SBM-DRM, and CSP-DRM) as the protein ingredient(s). A 6×3 factorial arrangement was employed with dietary types and storage time (0 d, 2 wk, and 4 wk) as the main effects. After 12 wk of diet feeding, a total of 270 eggs were collected for egg quality determination. The egg Haugh unit (HU) in the CSP, SBM-DRM, and DRM groups were significantly lower than those in the SBM and SBM-CSP groups. The hardness and springiness of the cooked yolk in the CSP group were significantly higher than those in the other treatment groups. A lower HU, lower yolk index and higher albumen pH were observed in the DRM group compared to the SBM and SBM-CSP groups when the eggs were stored to 4 wk, and the HU was improved in the CSP-DRM group compared to the DRM group (p<0.05). Higher yolk hardness was observed in the CSP group compared to the other groups during storage (p<0.05), but the hardness of the cooked yolk in the SBM-CSP and CSP-DRM groups showed no difference in comparison to the SBM group. In conclusion, CSP may ameliorate the negative effects of DRM on the HU of refrigerated eggs, and SBM or DRM may alleviate the adverse effects of CSP on yolk hardness.
本研究旨在评估不同蛋白质来源(豆粕、棉籽蛋白、双低菜籽粕)对冷藏鸡蛋内部品质的影响。总共360只产蛋母鸡(32周龄)被随机分配到六个处理组(每个处理五个重复),分别饲喂含有豆粕、棉籽蛋白或双低菜籽粕单独或与粗蛋白含量相等的组合(豆粕 - 棉籽蛋白、豆粕 - 双低菜籽粕和棉籽蛋白 - 双低菜籽粕)作为蛋白质成分的日粮。采用6×3析因设计,日粮类型和储存时间(0天、2周和4周)作为主要效应因素。日粮饲喂12周后,共收集270枚鸡蛋进行蛋品质测定。棉籽蛋白组、豆粕 - 双低菜籽粕组和双低菜籽粕组的鸡蛋哈夫单位(HU)显著低于豆粕组和豆粕 - 棉籽蛋白组。棉籽蛋白组煮熟蛋黄的硬度和弹性显著高于其他处理组。与豆粕组和豆粕 - 棉籽蛋白组相比,双低菜籽粕组鸡蛋储存至4周时哈夫单位较低、蛋黄指数较低且蛋白pH值较高,而棉籽蛋白 - 双低菜籽粕组与双低菜籽粕组相比哈夫单位有所改善(p<0.05)。储存期间,棉籽蛋白组蛋黄硬度高于其他组(p<0.05),但豆粕 - 棉籽蛋白组和棉籽蛋白 - 双低菜籽粕组煮熟蛋黄的硬度与豆粕组相比无差异。总之,棉籽蛋白可能改善双低菜籽粕对冷藏鸡蛋哈夫单位的负面影响,而豆粕或双低菜籽粕可能减轻棉籽蛋白对蛋黄硬度的不利影响。