Hess Jeremy J, Wallenstein Joshua, Ackerman Jeremy D, Akhter Murtaza, Ander Douglas, Keadey Matthew T, Capes James P
Emory University School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
West J Emerg Med. 2015 Sep;16(5):602-10. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2015.6.25432. Epub 2015 Oct 20.
Physicians dedicate substantial time to documentation. Scribes are sometimes used to improve efficiency by performing documentation tasks, although their impacts have not been prospectively evaluated. Our objective was to assess a scribe program's impact on emergency department (ED) throughput, physician time utilization, and job satisfaction in a large academic emergency medicine practice.
We evaluated the intervention using pre- and post-intervention surveys and administrative data. All site physicians were included. Pre- and post-intervention data were collected in four-month periods one year apart. Primary outcomes included changes in monthly average ED length of stay (LOS), provider-specific average relative value units (RVUs) per hour (raw and normalized to volume), self-reported estimates of time spent teaching, self-reported estimates of time spent documenting, and job satisfaction. We analyzed data using descriptive statistics and appropriate tests for paired pre-post differences in continuous, categorical, and ranked variables.
Pre- and post-survey response rates were 76.1% and 69.0%, respectively. Most responded positively to the intervention, although 9.5% reported negative impressions. There was a 36% reduction (25%-50%; p<0.01) in time spent documenting and a 30% increase (11%-46%, p<0.01) in time spent in direct patient contact. No statistically significant changes were seen in job satisfaction or perception of time spent teaching. ED volume increased by 88 patients per day (32-146, p=0.04) pre- to post- and LOS was unchanged; rates of patients leaving against medical advice dropped, and rates of patients leaving without being seen increased. RVUs per hour increased 5.5% and per patient 5.3%; both were statistically significant. No statistically significant changes were seen in patients seen per hour. There was moderate correlation between changes in ED volume and changes in productivity metrics.
Scribes were well received in our practice. Documentation time was substantially reduced and redirected primarily to patient care. Despite an ED volume increase, LOS was maintained, with fewer patients leaving against medical advice but more leaving without being seen. RVUs per hour and per patient both increased.
医生需要投入大量时间进行病历记录。有时会使用抄写员来执行病历记录任务以提高效率,不过其影响尚未经过前瞻性评估。我们的目标是评估一个抄写员项目对一家大型学术急诊医学机构的急诊科(ED)工作效率、医生时间利用情况和工作满意度的影响。
我们使用干预前后的调查和管理数据来评估该干预措施。纳入了所有现场医生。在相隔一年的四个月时间段内收集干预前后的数据。主要结果包括每月平均急诊留观时间(LOS)的变化、特定提供者每小时的平均相对价值单位(RVU)(原始值和按工作量标准化后的值)、自我报告的教学时间估计值、自我报告的病历记录时间估计值以及工作满意度。我们使用描述性统计和针对连续、分类和排序变量的配对前后差异的适当检验来分析数据。
调查前和调查后的回复率分别为76.1%和69.0%。大多数人对该干预措施给予了积极回应,不过9.5%的人报告了负面印象。病历记录时间减少了36%(25%-50%;p<0.01),直接接触患者的时间增加了30%(11%-46%,p<0.01)。工作满意度或对教学时间的感知没有统计学上的显著变化。干预前后急诊量每天增加了88例患者(32-146,p=0.04),留观时间未变;违背医嘱离院的患者比例下降,未就诊离院的患者比例上升。每小时的RVU增加了5.5%,每位患者的RVU增加了5.3%;两者均具有统计学显著性。每小时就诊的患者数量没有统计学上的显著变化。急诊量的变化与生产率指标的变化之间存在中等程度的相关性。
抄写员在我们的机构中受到了好评。病历记录时间大幅减少,主要重新分配到了患者护理上。尽管急诊量增加,但留观时间保持不变,违背医嘱离院的患者减少,但未就诊离院的患者增多。每小时和每位患者的RVU均增加。