Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology.
Department of Ophthalmology Oregon Health & Science University Portland, Oregon.
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2021 Jan 25;2020:573-582. eCollection 2020.
Many medical providers employ scribes to manage electronic health record (EHR) documentation. Prior studies have shown the benefits of scribes, but no large-scale study has quantitively assessed scribe impact on documentation workflows. We propose methods that leverage EHR data for identifying scribe presence during an office visit, measuring provider documentation time, and determining how notes are edited and composed. In a case study, we found scribe use was associated with less provider documentation time overall (averaging 2.4 minutes or 39% less time, p < 0.001), fewer note edits by providers (8.4% less added and 4.2% less deleted text, p < 0.001), but significantly more documentation time after the visit for four out of seven providers (p < 0.001) and no change in the amount of copied and imported note text. Our methods could validate prior study results, identify variability for determining best practices, and determine that scribes do not improve all aspects of documentation.
许多医疗服务提供者聘请书记员来管理电子健康记录 (EHR) 文档。先前的研究表明了书记员的好处,但没有大规模的研究定量评估书记员对文档工作流程的影响。我们提出了一些方法,利用 EHR 数据来识别就诊期间书记员的存在,衡量提供者的文档时间,并确定笔记的编辑和组成方式。在一项案例研究中,我们发现书记员的使用与提供者的文档时间总体上减少了 2.4 分钟(平均减少 39%,p<0.001),提供者添加的笔记编辑量减少了 8.4%(p<0.001),删除的文本减少了 4.2%,但有 4 个中的 7 个提供者在就诊后花费了更多的文档时间(p<0.001),而复制和导入的笔记文本量没有变化。我们的方法可以验证先前研究结果,确定确定最佳实践的可变性,并确定书记员不能改善文档的所有方面。