Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Acad Emerg Med. 2010 May;17(5):490-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00718.x.
The objective was to quantify the effect of scribes on three measures of emergency physician (EP) productivity in an adult emergency department (ED).
For this retrospective study, 243 clinical shifts (of either 10 or 12 hours) worked by 13 EPs during an 18-month period were selected for evaluation. Payroll data sheets were examined to determine whether these shifts were covered, uncovered, or partially covered (for less than 4 hours) by a scribe; partially covered shifts were grouped with uncovered shifts for analysis. Covered shifts were compared to uncovered shifts in a clustered design, by physician. Hierarchical linear models were used to study the association between percentage of patients with which a scribe was used during a shift and EP productivity as measured by patients per hour, relative value units (RVUs) per hour, and turnaround time (TAT) to discharge.
RVUs per hour increased by 0.24 units (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.10 to 0.38, p = 0.0011) for every 10% increment in scribe usage during a shift. The number of patients per hour increased by 0.08 (95% CI = 0.04 to 0.12, p = 0.0024) for every 10% increment of scribe usage during a shift. TAT was not significantly associated with scribe use. These associations did not lose significance after accounting for physician assistant (PA) use.
In this retrospective study, EP use of a scribe was associated with improved overall productivity as measured by patients treated per hour (Pt/hr) and RVU generated per hour by EPs, but not as measured by TAT to discharge.
本研究旨在定量评估在成人急诊科中使用记录员对急诊医师(EP)三种生产力衡量指标的影响。
在这项回顾性研究中,选择了 13 名 EP 在 18 个月期间的 243 个临床班次(每班 10 或 12 小时)进行评估。检查工资单数据表以确定这些班次是否由记录员覆盖、未覆盖或部分覆盖(少于 4 小时);部分覆盖的班次与未覆盖的班次一起进行分析。在聚类设计中,按医师对覆盖班次与未覆盖班次进行比较。使用分层线性模型研究了在班次中使用记录员的患者百分比与 EP 生产力(以每小时处理的患者数、每小时相对价值单位(RVU)和出院周转时间(TAT)衡量)之间的关联。
在班次中使用记录员的比例每增加 10%,每小时 RVU 增加 0.24 个单位(95%置信区间[CI] = 0.10 至 0.38,p = 0.0011)。每班次记录员使用率每增加 10%,每小时处理的患者数增加 0.08(95%CI = 0.04 至 0.12,p = 0.0024)。TAT 与记录员的使用无显著关联。在考虑使用医师助理(PA)后,这些关联仍然具有统计学意义。
在这项回顾性研究中,EP 使用记录员与每小时治疗的患者数(Pt/hr)和 EP 每小时产生的 RVU 等总体生产力衡量指标的提高相关,但与 TAT 无关。