Suppr超能文献

支线航空运营中多次起降的疲劳效应。

Fatiguing effect of multiple take-offs and landings in regional airline operations.

作者信息

Honn Kimberly A, Satterfield Brieann C, McCauley Peter, Caldwell J Lynn, Van Dongen Hans P A

机构信息

Sleep and Performance Research Center, Washington State University, PO Box 1495, Spokane, WA 99210, USA; Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Washington State University, PO Box 1495, Spokane, WA 99210, USA.

Sleep and Performance Research Center, Washington State University, PO Box 1495, Spokane, WA 99210, USA.

出版信息

Accid Anal Prev. 2016 Jan;86:199-208. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.10.005. Epub 2015 Nov 17.

Abstract

Fatigue is a risk factor for flight performance and safety in commercial aviation. In US commercial aviation, to help to curb fatigue, the maximum duration of flight duty periods is regulated based on the scheduled start time and the number of flight segments to be flown. There is scientific support for regulating maximum duty duration based on scheduled start time; fatigue is well established to be modulated by circadian rhythms. However, it has not been established scientifically whether the number of flight segments, per se, affects fatigue. To address this science gap, we conducted a randomized, counterbalanced, cross-over study with 24 active-duty regional airline pilots. Objective and subjective fatigue was compared between a 9-hour duty day with multiple take-offs and landings versus a duty day of equal duration with a single take-off and landing. To standardize experimental conditions and isolate the fatiguing effect of the number of segments flown, the entire duty schedules were carried out in a high-fidelity, moving-base, full-flight, regional jet flight simulator. Steps were taken to maintain operational realism, including simulated airplane inspections and acceptance checks, use of realistic dispatch releases and airport charts, real-world air traffic control interactions, etc. During each of the two duty days, 10 fatigue test bouts were administered, which included a 10-minute Psychomotor Vigilance Test (PVT) assessment of objective fatigue and Samn-Perelli (SP) and Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS) assessments of subjective sleepiness/fatigue. Results showed a greater build-up of objective and subjective fatigue in the multi-segment duty day than in the single-segment duty day. With duty start time and duration and other variables that could impact fatigue levels held constant, the greater build-up of fatigue in the multi-segment duty day was attributable specifically to the difference in the number of flight segments flown. Compared to findings in previously published laboratory studies of simulated night shifts and nighttime sleep deprivation, the magnitude of the fatiguing effect of the multiple take-offs and landings was modest. Ratings of flight performance were not significantly reduced for the simulated multi-segment duty day. The US duty and flight time regulations for commercial aviation shorten the maximum duty duration in multi-segment operations by up to 25% depending on the duty start time. The present results represent an important first step in understanding fatigue in multi-segment operations, and provide support for the number of flight segments as a relevant factor in regulating maximum duty duration. Nonetheless, based on our fatigue results, a more moderate reduction in maximum duty duration as a function of the number of flight segments might be considered. However, further research is needed to include investigation of flight safety, and to extend our findings to nighttime operations.

摘要

疲劳是商业航空飞行性能和安全的一个风险因素。在美国商业航空领域,为帮助控制疲劳,飞行执勤期的最长时长是根据预定开始时间和飞行航段数量来规定的。基于预定开始时间来规定最长执勤时长有科学依据;众所周知,疲劳受昼夜节律调节。然而,飞行航段数量本身是否会影响疲劳尚未得到科学证实。为填补这一科学空白,我们对24名现役支线航空公司飞行员进行了一项随机、平衡、交叉研究。比较了一个有多次起飞和降落的9小时执勤日与一个时长相同但只有一次起飞和降落的执勤日之间的客观和主观疲劳情况。为使实验条件标准化并分离飞行航段数量的疲劳效应,整个执勤计划是在一个高保真、可移动基座、全飞行的支线喷气式飞行模拟器中执行的。采取了措施以保持操作的真实性,包括模拟飞机检查和验收检查、使用真实的放行通知和机场图表、与现实中的空中交通管制进行互动等。在两个执勤日的每一天中,进行了10次疲劳测试回合,其中包括一项10分钟的心理运动警觉性测试(PVT)以评估客观疲劳,以及使用萨姆恩 - 佩雷利(SP)量表和卡罗林斯卡嗜睡量表(KSS)来评估主观嗜睡/疲劳。结果显示,多航段执勤日的客观和主观疲劳积累比单航段执勤日更大。在执勤开始时间、时长以及其他可能影响疲劳水平的变量保持不变的情况下,多航段执勤日中更大的疲劳积累具体归因于飞行航段数量的差异。与之前发表的关于模拟夜班和夜间睡眠剥夺的实验室研究结果相比,多次起飞和降落的疲劳效应程度适中。模拟多航段执勤日的飞行性能评级没有显著降低。美国商业航空的执勤和飞行时间规定根据执勤开始时间,将多航段运营中的最长执勤时长缩短了多达25%。目前的结果是理解多航段运营中疲劳情况的重要第一步,并为飞行航段数量作为调节最长执勤时长的一个相关因素提供了支持。尽管如此,基于我们的疲劳研究结果,或许可以考虑根据飞行航段数量更适度地缩短最长执勤时长。然而,还需要进一步开展研究,包括对飞行安全的调查,并将我们的研究结果扩展到夜间运营。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验