Department of Theoretical Chemistry, Lund University, Chemical Centre, P.O. Box 124, SE-221 00 Lund, Sweden.
Faculty of Chemistry, North-east Normal University, Changchun, 130024, P. R. China.
J Chem Theory Comput. 2011 Mar 8;7(3):761-77. doi: 10.1021/ct100530r. Epub 2011 Feb 7.
We have studied the convergence of QM/MM calculations with respect to the size of the QM system. We study a proton transfer between a first-sphere cysteine ligand and a second-sphere histidine group in [Ni,Fe] hydrogenase and use a 446-atom model of the protein, treated purely with QM methods as a reference. We have tested 12 different ways to redistribute charges close to the junctions (to avoid overpolarization of the QM system), but once the junctions are moved away from the active site, there is little need to redistribute the charges. We have tested 13 different variants of QM/MM approaches, including two schemes to correct errors caused by the truncation of the QM system. However, we see little gain from such correction schemes; on the contrary, they are sensitive to the charge-redistribution scheme and may cause large errors if charges are close to the junctions. In fact, the best results were obtained with a mechanical embedding approach that does not employ any correction scheme and ignores polarization. It gives a mean unsigned error for 40 QM systems of different sizes of 7 kJ/mol with a maximum error of 28 kJ/mol. The errors can be significantly decreased if bonds between the QM and MM system (junctions) are moved one residue away from all active-site residues. Then, most QM/MM variants give mean unsigned errors of 5-9 kJ/mol, maximum errors of 16-35 kJ/mol, and only five to seven residues give an error of over 5 kJ/mol. In general, QM/MM calculations converge faster with system size than pure QM calculations.
我们研究了 QM/MM 计算在 QM 体系大小方面的收敛性。我们研究了 [Ni,Fe] 氢化酶中第一球半胱氨酸配体和第二球组氨酸之间的质子转移,并使用了一个 446 个原子的蛋白质模型,该模型完全用 QM 方法处理作为参考。我们已经测试了 12 种不同的方法来重新分配靠近界面的电荷(以避免 QM 体系的过极化),但是一旦界面远离活性位点,就几乎不需要重新分配电荷。我们已经测试了 13 种不同的 QM/MM 方法变体,包括两种校正由于 QM 体系截断而导致的错误的方案。然而,我们从这种校正方案中几乎没有得到任何收益;相反,它们对电荷再分配方案很敏感,如果电荷靠近界面,可能会导致很大的误差。事实上,最好的结果是通过一种机械嵌入方法获得的,该方法不使用任何校正方案,也忽略了极化。它对 40 个不同大小的 QM 体系的平均无符号误差为 7 kJ/mol,最大误差为 28 kJ/mol。如果将 QM 和 MM 体系(界面)之间的键从所有活性位点残基移动一个残基,误差可以显著降低。然后,大多数 QM/MM 变体的平均无符号误差为 5-9 kJ/mol,最大误差为 16-35 kJ/mol,只有五个到七个残基的误差超过 5 kJ/mol。一般来说,QM/MM 计算比纯 QM 计算更快地随着体系规模的增加而收敛。