Joseph Christine L M, Lu Mei, Stokes-Bruzzelli Stephanie, Johnson Dayna A, Duffy Elizabeth, Demers Michele, Zhang Talan, Ownby Dennis R, Zoratti Edward, Mahajan Prashant
Department of Public Health Sciences, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan.
Department of Public Health Sciences, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2016 Jan;116(1):43-8. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2015.10.021. Epub 2015 Nov 17.
The emergency department could represent a means of identifying patients with asthma who could benefit from asthma interventions.
To assess the initiation of a Web-based tailored asthma intervention in the emergency department of 2 urban tertiary care hospitals.
In addition to awareness strategies for emergency department staff (eg, attending nursing huddles, division meetings, etc), recruitment experiences are described for 2 strategies: (1) recruitment during an emergency department visit for acute asthma and (2) recruitment from patient listings (mail or telephone). Patient enrollment was defined as baseline completion, randomization, and completion of the first of 4 online sessions.
Of 499 eligible patients 13 to 19 years old visiting the emergency department for asthma during the study period, 313 (63%) were contacted in the emergency department (n = 65) or by mail or telephone (n = 350). Of these, 121 (38.6%) were randomized. Mean age of the study sample was 15.4 years and 88.4% were African American. Refusal rates for emergency department recruitment and mail or telephone were 18.5% (12 of 65) and 16.6% (58 of 350), respectively. On average, emergency department enrollment took 44 to 67 minutes, including downtime. When surveyed, emergency department providers were more positive about awareness activities and emergency department recruitment than were research staff.
Emergency department recruitment was feasible but labor intensive. Refusal rates were similar for the 2 strategies. Targeting patients with acute asthma in the emergency department is one way of connecting with youth at risk of future acute events.
急诊科可能是识别能从哮喘干预中获益的哮喘患者的一种途径。
评估在两家城市三级医疗机构的急诊科开展基于网络的定制哮喘干预措施。
除了针对急诊科工作人员的宣传策略(如参加护理小组会议、科室会议等),还描述了两种招募策略的经验:(1)在急诊科对急性哮喘患者进行招募,以及(2)从患者名单中进行招募(邮件或电话)。患者入组定义为完成基线调查、随机分组以及完成4次在线课程中的第一次。
在研究期间,499名年龄在13至19岁因哮喘到急诊科就诊的符合条件的患者中,有313名(63%)在急诊科(n = 65)或通过邮件或电话(n = 350)被联系到。其中,121名(38.6%)被随机分组。研究样本的平均年龄为15.4岁,88.4%为非裔美国人。急诊科招募和邮件或电话招募的拒绝率分别为18.5%(65名中的12名)和16.6%(350名中的58名)。平均而言,在急诊科入组需要44至67分钟,包括停机时间。在接受调查时,急诊科医护人员对宣传活动和急诊科招募比研究人员更积极。
在急诊科招募可行但劳动强度大。两种策略的拒绝率相似。在急诊科针对急性哮喘患者是与有未来急性发作风险的年轻人建立联系的一种方式。