Suppr超能文献

肾素-血管紧张素系统抑制剂在慢性肾脏病患者的肾脏和心血管结局中的作用:一项随机临床试验的贝叶斯网络荟萃分析。

Renin-Angiotensin System Inhibitors and Kidney and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With CKD: A Bayesian Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.

机构信息

Renal Division, Peking University First Hospital; Peking University Institute of Nephrology; Key Laboratory of Renal Disease, Ministry of Health of China; Key Laboratory of Chronic Kidney Disease Prevention and Treatment (Peking University), Ministry of Education, Peking, China.

The George Institute for Global Health, the University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Am J Kidney Dis. 2016 May;67(5):728-41. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2015.10.011. Epub 2015 Nov 18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is much uncertainty regarding the relative effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) in populations with chronic kidney disease (CKD).

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.

SETTING & POPULATION: Patients with CKD treated with renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors.

SELECTION CRITERIA FOR STUDIES

Randomized trials in patients with CKD treated with RAS inhibitors.

PREDICTOR

ACE inhibitors and ARBs compared to each other and to placebo and active controls.

OUTCOME

Primary outcome was kidney failure; secondary outcomes were major cardiovascular events, all-cause death.

RESULTS

119 randomized controlled trials (n = 64,768) were included. ACE inhibitors and ARBs reduced the odds of kidney failure by 39% and 30% (ORs of 0.61 [95% credible interval, 0.47-0.79] and 0.70 [95% credible interval, 0.52-0.89]), respectively, compared to placebo, and by 35% and 25% (ORs of 0.65 [95% credible interval, 0.51-0.80] and 0.75 [95% credible interval, 0.54-0.97]), respectively, compared with other active controls, whereas other active controls did not show evidence of a significant effect on kidney failure. Both ACE inhibitors and ARBs produced odds reductions for major cardiovascular events (ORs of 0.82 [95% credible interval, 0.71-0.92] and 0.76 [95% credible interval, 0.62-0.89], respectively) versus placebo. Comparisons did not show significant effects on risk for cardiovascular death. ACE inhibitors but not ARBs significantly reduced the odds of all-cause death versus active controls (OR, 0.72; 95% credible interval, 0.53-0.92). Compared with ARBs, ACE inhibitors were consistently associated with higher probabilities of reducing kidney failure, cardiovascular death, or all-cause death.

LIMITATIONS

Trials with RAS inhibitor therapy were included; trials with direct comparisons of other active controls with placebo were not included.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of ACE inhibitors or ARBs in people with CKD reduces the risk for kidney failure and cardiovascular events. ACE inhibitors also reduced the risk for all-cause mortality and were possibly superior to ARBs for kidney failure, cardiovascular death, and all-cause mortality in patients with CKD, suggesting that they could be the first choice for treatment in this population.

摘要

背景

在患有慢性肾病(CKD)的人群中,血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂和血管紧张素 II 受体阻滞剂(ARB)的相对作用存在很大的不确定性。

研究设计

系统评价和贝叶斯网络荟萃分析。

研究场所和人群

接受肾素-血管紧张素系统(RAS)抑制剂治疗的 CKD 患者。

研究选择标准

接受 RAS 抑制剂治疗的 CKD 患者的随机试验。

预测

ACE 抑制剂和 ARB 与彼此以及安慰剂和活性对照进行比较。

主要结局

肾衰竭;次要结局:主要心血管事件,全因死亡。

结果

纳入了 119 项随机对照试验(n = 64768)。ACE 抑制剂和 ARB 分别使肾衰竭的几率降低了 39%和 30%(OR 分别为 0.61 [95%可信区间,0.47-0.79] 和 0.70 [95%可信区间,0.52-0.89]),与安慰剂相比,与其他活性对照相比,ACE 抑制剂和 ARB 分别使肾衰竭的几率降低了 35%和 25%(OR 分别为 0.65 [95%可信区间,0.51-0.80] 和 0.75 [95%可信区间,0.54-0.97]),而其他活性对照并未显示出对肾衰竭有显著影响的证据。ACE 抑制剂和 ARB 均降低了主要心血管事件的几率(OR 分别为 0.82 [95%可信区间,0.71-0.92] 和 0.76 [95%可信区间,0.62-0.89])与安慰剂相比。比较并未显示出对心血管死亡风险的显著影响。ACE 抑制剂而非 ARB 与活性对照相比,降低全因死亡的几率(OR,0.72;95%可信区间,0.53-0.92)。与 ARB 相比,ACE 抑制剂始终与降低肾衰竭、心血管死亡或全因死亡的几率相关。

局限性

包括 RAS 抑制剂治疗的试验;未包括直接比较其他活性对照与安慰剂的试验。

结论

在 CKD 患者中使用 ACE 抑制剂或 ARB 可降低肾衰竭和心血管事件的风险。ACE 抑制剂还降低了全因死亡率的风险,并且在 CKD 患者中,ACE 抑制剂可能在肾衰竭、心血管死亡和全因死亡率方面优于 ARB,这表明它们可能是该人群治疗的首选。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验