Suppr超能文献

小鼠沙门氏菌病中的保护性免疫:光滑型和粗糙型活疫苗及灭活疫苗的比较

Protective immunity in mouse salmonellosis: comparison of smooth and rough live and killed vaccines.

作者信息

Muotiala A, Hovi M, Mäkelä P H

机构信息

National Public Health Institute, Helsinki, Finland.

出版信息

Microb Pathog. 1989 Jan;6(1):51-60. doi: 10.1016/0882-4010(89)90007-7.

Abstract

Protective immunity against Salmonella infection was studied in a mouse model. To study specificity of protection we used smooth (O-4,5,12) and rough vaccines; live and killed vaccines of both types were compared. The protection was assessed by enumerating the number of bacteria in the livers, and by following survival of the mice after intravenous challenge with smooth O-4,5,12 bacteria. Passively transferred antibodies induced by the smooth vaccines had a small protective effect and those induced by the rough vaccines no protective effect in this model. Both live vaccines induced long-lasting protective immunity which was much stronger than that mediated by antibodies. Since the live rough vaccine induced protective immunity and contained no O antigen we conclude that the protective immunity induced by it was mainly cell-mediated and directed to other antigens than the O antigen, the target of protective antibodies. Both killed vaccines also induced protective immunity, but this was weaker than that induced by the corresponding live vaccine.

摘要

在小鼠模型中研究了针对沙门氏菌感染的保护性免疫。为了研究保护的特异性,我们使用了光滑(O-4,5,12)疫苗和粗糙疫苗;比较了两种类型的活疫苗和灭活疫苗。通过计数肝脏中的细菌数量以及在静脉注射光滑O-4,5,12细菌后观察小鼠的存活情况来评估保护效果。在该模型中,由光滑疫苗诱导的被动转移抗体具有较小的保护作用,而由粗糙疫苗诱导的抗体则没有保护作用。两种活疫苗都诱导了持久的保护性免疫,其比抗体介导的免疫要强得多。由于活粗糙疫苗诱导了保护性免疫且不含O抗原,我们得出结论,由其诱导的保护性免疫主要是细胞介导的,并且针对的是除O抗原(保护性抗体的靶标)之外的其他抗原。两种灭活疫苗也诱导了保护性免疫,但比相应的活疫苗诱导的免疫要弱。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验