• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

有孩子和吸烟者家庭与无孩子和吸烟者家庭中无烟规定的全国及各州流行情况:二十年的进展。

National and state prevalence of smoke-free rules in homes with and without children and smokers: Two decades of progress.

作者信息

King Brian A, Patel Roshni, Babb Stephen D, Hartman Anne M, Freeman Alison

机构信息

Office on Smoking and Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Office on Smoking and Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.

出版信息

Prev Med. 2016 Jan;82:51-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.11.010. Epub 2015 Nov 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.11.010
PMID:26601642
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4766981/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The home is the primary source of secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure for children. We assessed national and state progress in smoke-free home (SFH) rule adoption in homes with and without children and adult smokers.

METHODS

Data came from the 1992-1993 and 2010-2011 Tobacco Use Supplements to the Current Population Survey, a U.S. national probability household survey. Households were defined as having a SFH rule if all household respondents aged ≥18 indicated no one was allowed to smoke inside the home at any time. Households with children were those with occupants aged <18. Smokers were those who smoked ≥100 lifetime cigarettes and now smoked "everyday" or "some days".

RESULTS

From 1992-1993 to 2010-2011, SFH rule prevalence increased from 43.0% to 83.0% (p<.05). Among households with children, SFH rules increased overall (44.9% to 88.6%), in households without smokers (59.7% to 95.0%), and households with ≥1 smokers (9.7% to 61.0%) (p<.05). Among households without children, SFH rules increased overall (40.8% to 81.1%), in households without smokers (53.4% to 90.1%), and households with ≥1 smokers (6.3% to 40.9%) (p<.05). Prevalence increased in all states, irrespective of smoker or child occupancy (p<.05). In 2010-2011, among homes with smokers and children, SFH rule prevalence ranged from 36.5% (West Virginia) to 86.8% (California).

CONCLUSIONS

Considerable progress has been made adopting SFH rules, but many U.S. children continue to be exposed to SHS because their homes are not smoke-free. Further efforts to promote adoption of SFH rules are essential to protect all children from this health risk.

摘要

目的

家庭是儿童接触二手烟(SHS)的主要来源。我们评估了在有儿童和成人吸烟者以及无儿童和成人吸烟者的家庭中,无烟家庭(SFH)规则采用情况的全国及各州进展。

方法

数据来自1992 - 1993年和2010 - 2011年对当前人口调查的烟草使用补充调查,这是一项美国全国性概率住户调查。如果所有年龄≥18岁的家庭受访者表示任何时候都不允许任何人在屋内吸烟,则该家庭被定义为有SFH规则。有儿童的家庭是指有年龄<18岁居住者的家庭。吸烟者是指终生吸烟≥100支且现在“每天”或“有时”吸烟的人。

结果

从1992 - 1993年到2010 - 2011年,SFH规则的普及率从43.0%提高到了83.0%(p<0.05)。在有儿童的家庭中,SFH规则总体上有所增加(从44.9%增至88.6%),在无吸烟者的家庭中(从59.7%增至95.0%),以及在有≥1名吸烟者的家庭中(从9.7%增至61.0%)(均p<0.05)。在无儿童的家庭中,SFH规则总体上也有所增加(从40.8%增至81.1%),在无吸烟者的家庭中(从53.4%增至90.1%),以及在有≥1名吸烟者的家庭中(从6.3%增至40.9%)(均p<0.05)。所有州的普及率都有所提高,无论是否有吸烟者或儿童居住(p<0.05)。在2010 - 2011年,在有吸烟者和儿童的家庭中,SFH规则的普及率从36.5%(西弗吉尼亚州)到86.8%(加利福尼亚州)不等。

结论

在采用SFH规则方面已取得相当大的进展,但许多美国儿童仍继续接触二手烟,因为他们的家庭并非无烟环境。进一步努力促进采用SFH规则对于保护所有儿童免受这种健康风险至关重要。

相似文献

1
National and state prevalence of smoke-free rules in homes with and without children and smokers: Two decades of progress.有孩子和吸烟者家庭与无孩子和吸烟者家庭中无烟规定的全国及各州流行情况:二十年的进展。
Prev Med. 2016 Jan;82:51-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.11.010. Epub 2015 Nov 18.
2
Prevalence of smokefree home rules--United States, 1992-1993 and 2010-2011.无烟家庭规定的流行情况——美国,1992-1993 年和 2010-2011 年。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2014 Sep 5;63(35):765-9.
3
Disseminating a Smoke-free Homes Program to Low Socioeconomic Status Households in the United States Through 2-1-1: Results of a National Impact Evaluation.通过 2-1-1 向美国社会经济地位较低的家庭传播无烟家庭计划:全国影响评估结果。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2020 Apr 17;22(4):498-505. doi: 10.1093/ntr/nty256.
4
State-specific prevalence of smoke-free home rules--United States, 1992-2003.1992 - 2003年美国各州无烟家庭规则的流行情况
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2007 May 25;56(20):501-4.
5
Factors associated with smoke-free homes in NSW: results from the 1998 NSW Health Survey.新南威尔士州无烟家庭的相关因素:1998年新南威尔士州健康调查结果
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2001 Aug;25(4):339-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-842x.2001.tb00590.x.
6
Disparities in trends of smoke-free home associated with socioeconomic disadvantages in the United States from 2001 to 2019.2001年至2019年美国无烟家庭趋势与社会经济劣势的差异
Prev Med. 2024 Dec;189:108173. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2024.108173. Epub 2024 Nov 9.
7
A protocol for measuring the impact of a smoke-free housing policy on indoor tobacco smoke exposure.测量无烟住房政策对室内烟草烟雾暴露影响的方案。
BMC Public Health. 2019 May 30;19(1):666. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7043-3.
8
Evaluation of Secondhand Smoke Exposure in New York City Public Housing After Implementation of the 2018 Federal Smoke-Free Housing Policy.评估 2018 年联邦无烟住房政策实施后纽约市公屋中的二手烟暴露情况。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Nov 2;3(11):e2024385. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.24385.
9
Household Implementation of Smoke-Free Rules in Homes and Cars: A Focus on Adolescent Smoking Behavior and Secondhand Smoke Exposure.家庭中实施室内禁烟和车内禁烟规则:关注青少年吸烟行为和二手烟暴露。
Am J Health Promot. 2019 Jan;33(1):70-78. doi: 10.1177/0890117118776901. Epub 2018 May 16.
10
Parental Practices and Attitudes Related to Smoke-Free Rules in Homes, Cars, and Outdoor Playgrounds in US Households With Underage Children and Smokers, 2010-2011.2010 - 2011年美国有未成年子女和吸烟者家庭中与家庭、汽车及户外游乐场无烟规则相关的父母行为及态度
Prev Chronic Dis. 2015 Jun 18;12:E96. doi: 10.5888/pcd12.140553.

引用本文的文献

1
Influence of the home smoking environment and stress on smoking behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic among patients of federally qualified health centers in rural Georgia.佐治亚州农村地区联邦合格健康中心的患者在新冠疫情期间家庭吸烟环境和压力对吸烟行为的影响。
Tob Prev Cessat. 2024 Dec 10;10. doi: 10.18332/tpc/195832. eCollection 2024.
2
Risk Factors for E-Cigarette Ban Relaxation in Homes With Adolescents.家庭中青少年存在使电子烟禁令放宽的风险因素。
J Adolesc Health. 2024 Nov;75(5):766-771. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2024.05.006. Epub 2024 Jul 14.
3
Secondhand Nicotine Absorption From E-Cigarette Vapor vs Tobacco Smoke in Children.儿童从电子烟蒸气中二手吸收尼古丁与从烟草烟雾中吸收尼古丁的比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jul 1;7(7):e2421246. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.21246.
4
Are People More Likely to Vape or Smoke Indoors? A Population Survey of Adults in England.人们更倾向于在室内吸电子烟还是吸烟?一项对英格兰成年人的人口调查。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2024 Sep 23;26(10):1404-1411. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntae094.
5
Tobacco usage in the home: a cross-sectional analysis of heated tobacco product (HTP) use and combustible tobacco smoking in Japan, 2023.家庭中的烟草使用:2023 年日本对加热烟草产品(HTP)使用和可燃烟草吸烟的横断面分析。
Environ Health Prev Med. 2024;29:11. doi: 10.1265/ehpm.23-00292.
6
Contamination of surfaces in children's homes with nicotine and the potent carcinogenic tobacco-specific nitrosamine NNK.儿童福利院表面受到尼古丁和强致癌性烟草特异性亚硝胺 NNK 的污染。
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2024 Jul;34(4):727-734. doi: 10.1038/s41370-023-00629-8. Epub 2023 Dec 16.
7
Household vaping bans and youth e-cigarette use.家庭雾化禁令与青少年电子烟使用
Addiction. 2024 Jan;119(1):74-83. doi: 10.1111/add.16335. Epub 2023 Sep 15.
8
Disparities in Smokefree and Vapefree Home Rules and Smokefree Policy Attitudes Based on Housing Type and Cigarette Smoking Status, United States, 2019.基于住房类型和吸烟状况的美国家庭无烟和电子烟规则及无烟政策态度的差异,2019 年。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jul 13;20(14):6356. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20146356.
9
Tobacco Smoke Exposure and Sleep Duration among U.S. Adolescents.美国青少年的吸烟暴露与睡眠时间。
Behav Sleep Med. 2024 Mar 3;22(2):234-246. doi: 10.1080/15402002.2023.2232498. Epub 2023 Jul 7.
10
Systematic braiding of Smoke-Free Home SafeCare to address child maltreatment risk and secondhand smoke exposure: findings from a pilot study.无烟家庭安全护理的系统编织以应对儿童虐待风险和二手烟暴露:一项试点研究的结果。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2023 May 12;9(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s40814-023-01303-4.

本文引用的文献

1
The economic burden of exposure to secondhand smoke for child and adult never smokers residing in U.S. public housing.居住在美国公共住房中的儿童和成年非吸烟者接触二手烟的经济负担。
Public Health Rep. 2015 May-Jun;130(3):230-44. doi: 10.1177/003335491513000310.
2
Vital signs: disparities in nonsmokers' exposure to secondhand smoke--United States, 1999-2012.生命体征:1999-2012 年美国不吸烟人群二手烟暴露的差异。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2015 Feb 6;64(4):103-8.
3
Smoke-free multiunit housing: a review of the scientific literature.无烟多单元住房:科学文献综述
Tob Control. 2016 Jan;25(1):9-20. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051849. Epub 2015 Jan 7.
4
Predictors of children's secondhand smoke exposure at home: a systematic review and narrative synthesis of the evidence.儿童在家中二手烟暴露的预测因素:证据的系统评价与叙述性综合分析
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 14;9(11):e112690. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112690. eCollection 2014.
5
National and state cost savings associated with prohibiting smoking in subsidized and public housing in the United States.美国在补贴和公共住房中禁烟带来的国家和州成本节约。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2014 Oct 2;11:E171. doi: 10.5888/pcd11.140222.
6
Prevalence of smokefree home rules--United States, 1992-1993 and 2010-2011.无烟家庭规定的流行情况——美国,1992-1993 年和 2010-2011 年。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2014 Sep 5;63(35):765-9.
7
Battling tobacco use at home: an analysis of smoke-free home rules among U.S. veterans from 2001 to 2011.在家中对抗烟草使用:对2001年至2011年美国退伍军人无烟家庭规则的分析
Am J Public Health. 2014 Sep;104 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S572-9. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.301975.
8
Association between clean indoor air laws and voluntary smokefree rules in homes and cars.室内空气清洁法与家庭和汽车中自愿性无烟规定之间的关联。
Tob Control. 2015 Mar;24(2):168-74. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051121. Epub 2013 Oct 10.
9
Smoke-free rules and secondhand smoke exposure in homes and vehicles among US adults, 2009-2010.美国成年人 2009-2010 年家庭和交通工具内无烟规则和二手烟暴露情况。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2013 May 16;10:E79. doi: 10.5888/pcd10.120218.
10
National and state estimates of secondhand smoke infiltration among U.S. multiunit housing residents.美国多单元住房居民二手烟渗透的国家和州估计数。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2013 Jul;15(7):1316-21. doi: 10.1093/ntr/nts254. Epub 2012 Dec 17.