Moy Ernest, Coffey Rosanna M, Moore Brian J, Barrett Marguerite L, Hall Kendall K
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Center for Quality Improvement and Patient Safety, Rockville, MD, USA.
Truven Health Analytics, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Jan;34(1):83-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.09.031. Epub 2015 Sep 25.
Duration of a stay in an emergency department (ED) is considered a measure of quality, but current measures average lengths of stay across all conditions. Previous research on ED length of stay has been limited to a single condition or a few hospitals. We use a census of one state's data to measure length of ED stays by patients' conditions and dispositions and explore differences between means and medians as quality metrics.
The data source was the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project 2011 State Emergency Department Databases and State Inpatient Databases for Florida. Florida is unique in collecting ED length of stay for both released and admitted patients. Clinical Classifications Software was used to group visits based on first-listed International Classification of Disease, Ninth Edition, Clinical Modification, diagnoses.
For the 10 most common diagnoses, patients with relatively minor injuries typically required the shortest mean stay (3 hours or less); conditions resulting in admission or transfer tended to be more serious, resulting in longer stays. Patients requiring the longest stays, by disposition, had discharge diagnoses of nonspecific chest pain (mean 7.4 hours among discharged patients), urinary tract infections (4.8 hours among admissions), and schizophrenia (9.6 hours among transfers) among the top 10 diagnoses.
Emergency department length of stay as a measure of ED quality should take into account the considerable variation by condition and disposition of the patient. Emergency department length of stay measurement could be improved in the United States by standardizing its definition; distinguishing visits involving treatment, observation, and boarding; and incorporating more distributional information.
急诊室(ED)的住院时长被视为质量衡量指标,但目前的衡量方法是所有病情住院时长的平均值。以往关于急诊室住院时长的研究仅限于单一病情或少数几家医院。我们使用一个州的数据普查来按患者病情和处置方式衡量急诊室住院时长,并探讨均值和中位数之间的差异作为质量指标。
数据来源是2011年医疗保健成本与利用项目的佛罗里达州急诊室数据库和住院数据库。佛罗里达州在收集出院和入院患者的急诊室住院时长方面独具特色。使用临床分类软件根据首次列出的《国际疾病分类》第九版临床修订本诊断对就诊进行分组。
对于10种最常见的诊断,伤势相对较轻的患者通常平均住院时间最短(3小时或更短);导致入院或转院的病情往往更严重,住院时间更长。按处置方式来看,住院时间最长的患者在10种主要诊断中,出院诊断为非特异性胸痛(出院患者平均7.4小时)、尿路感染(入院患者4.8小时)和精神分裂症(转院患者9.6小时)。
将急诊室住院时长作为急诊室质量的衡量指标应考虑到患者病情和处置方式的显著差异。在美国,通过标准化其定义、区分涉及治疗、观察和留观的就诊以及纳入更多分布信息,可以改进急诊室住院时长的测量。