Dippel Gabriel, Chmielewski Witold, Mückschel Moritz, Beste Christian
Cognitive Neurophysiology, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine of the TU Dresden, Schubertstrasse 42, 01309, Dresden, Germany.
Brain Struct Funct. 2016 Nov;221(8):4091-4101. doi: 10.1007/s00429-015-1148-y. Epub 2015 Nov 25.
Response inhibition processes are one of the most important executive control functions and have been subject to intense research in cognitive neuroscience. However, knowledge on the neurophysiology and functional neuroanatomy on response inhibition is biased because studies usually employ experimental paradigms (e.g., sustained attention to response task, SART) in which behavior is susceptible to impulsive errors. Here, we investigate whether there are differences in neurophysiological mechanisms and networks depending on the response mode that predominates behavior in a response inhibition task. We do so comparing a SART with a traditionally formatted task paradigm. We use EEG-beamforming in two tasks inducing opposite response modes during action selection. We focus on theta frequency modulations, since these are implicated in cognitive control processes. The results show that a response mode that is susceptible to impulsive errors (response mode used in the SART) is associated with stronger theta band activity in the left temporo-parietal junction. The results suggest that the response modes applied during response inhibition differ in the encoding of surprise signals, or related processes of attentional sampling. Response modes during response inhibition seem to differ in processes necessary to update task representations relevant to behavioral control.
反应抑制过程是最重要的执行控制功能之一,一直是认知神经科学领域深入研究的对象。然而,关于反应抑制的神经生理学和功能性神经解剖学的知识存在偏差,因为研究通常采用实验范式(例如,持续注意反应任务,SART),在这些范式中,行为容易出现冲动性错误。在这里,我们研究在反应抑制任务中,根据主导行为的反应模式,神经生理机制和网络是否存在差异。我们通过将SART与传统格式的任务范式进行比较来进行研究。我们在两个任务中使用脑电图波束形成技术,这两个任务在动作选择过程中诱导出相反的反应模式。我们关注θ频率调制,因为这些与认知控制过程有关。结果表明,容易出现冲动性错误的反应模式(SART中使用的反应模式)与左颞顶交界处更强的θ波段活动相关。结果表明,反应抑制过程中应用的反应模式在意外信号的编码或注意力采样的相关过程中存在差异。反应抑制过程中的反应模式在更新与行为控制相关的任务表征所需的过程中似乎存在差异。