Adamson J
Department of Psychiatry, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg.
Can J Psychiatry. 1989 May;34(4):303-10. doi: 10.1177/070674378903400407.
DSM-III is a major document in the history of psychiatry. The DSM-III system is here seen as an instrument that promotes the scientific development of psychiatry and the clarity of communication among psychiatrists. However a major theme of this review is that reliability does not ensure validity. While making this point it is recognized that the major defects in the DSM-III system result from scientific inadequacies inherent in present day psychiatry. This review also may be taken as an amplification of the statement in DSM-III-R that it is not a textbook. In particular the data required to arrive at diagnoses in the DSM-III system do not provide sufficient information to arrive at a comprehensive biopsychosocial case formulation, a shortcoming that has relevance for teaching and clinical practice.
《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版(DSM - III)是精神病学史上的一份重要文件。DSM - III系统在本文中被视为一种推动精神病学科学发展以及精神科医生之间沟通清晰度的工具。然而,本综述的一个主要观点是,可靠性并不确保有效性。在阐述这一观点时,人们认识到DSM - III系统的主要缺陷源于当今精神病学固有的科学不足。本综述也可被视为对DSM - III - R中“它不是一本教科书”这一表述的扩充。特别是,DSM - III系统中用于做出诊断的数据并未提供足够信息以形成全面的生物心理社会病例构想,这一缺陷与教学和临床实践相关。