Hsu Hsien-Yuan, Kwok Oi-Man, Lin Jr Hung, Acosta Sandra
a Department of Leadership and Counselor Education , University of Mississippi.
b Department of Educational Psychology , Texas A&M University.
Multivariate Behav Res. 2015;50(2):197-215. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2014.977429.
This study investigated the sensitivity of common fit indices (i.e., RMSEA, CFI, TLI, SRMR-W, and SRMR-B) for detecting misspecified multilevel SEMs. The design factors for the Monte Carlo study were numbers of groups in between-group models (100, 150, and 300), group size (10, 20, 30, and 60), intra-class correlation (low, medium, and high), and the types of model misspecification (Simple and Complex). The simulation results showed that CFI, TLI, and RMSEA could only identify the misspecification in the within-group model. Additionally, CFI, TLI, and RMSEA were more sensitive to misspecification in pattern coefficients while SRMR-W was more sensitive to misspecification in factor covariance. Moreover, TLI outperformed both CFI and RMSEA in terms of the hit rates of detecting the within-group misspecification in factor covariance. On the other hand, SRMR-B was the only fit index sensitive to misspecification in the between-group model and more sensitive to misspecification in factor covariance than misspecification in pattern coefficients. Finally, we found that the influence of ICC on the performance of targeted fit indices was trivial.
本研究调查了常用拟合指数(即RMSEA、CFI、TLI、SRMR-W和SRMR-B)对检测错误设定的多层次结构方程模型的敏感性。蒙特卡洛研究的设计因素包括组间模型中的组数(100、150和300)、组大小(10、20、30和60)、组内相关(低、中、高)以及模型错误设定的类型(简单和复杂)。模拟结果表明,CFI、TLI和RMSEA只能识别组内模型中的错误设定。此外,CFI、TLI和RMSEA对模式系数中的错误设定更敏感,而SRMR-W对因子协方差中的错误设定更敏感。此外,在检测因子协方差中组内错误设定的命中率方面,TLI优于CFI和RMSEA。另一方面,SRMR-B是唯一对组间模型中的错误设定敏感的拟合指数,并且对因子协方差中的错误设定比对模式系数中的错误设定更敏感。最后,我们发现组内相关对目标拟合指数性能的影响微不足道。