Suppr超能文献

管道栓塞装置治疗既往已行支架置入术的复发性脑动脉瘤

Pipeline Embolization Device in the Treatment of Recurrent Previously Stented Cerebral Aneurysms.

作者信息

Daou B, Starke R M, Chalouhi N, Tjoumakaris S, Hasan D, Khoury J, Rosenwasser R H, Jabbour P

机构信息

From the Department of Neurosurgery (B.D., N.C., S.T., J.K., R.H.R., P.J.), Thomas Jefferson University and Jefferson Hospital for Neuroscience, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Department of Neurological Surgery (R.M.S.), University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia.

出版信息

AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2016 May;37(5):849-55. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4613. Epub 2015 Nov 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The use of the Pipeline Embolization Device in the management of recurrent previously stented cerebral aneurysms is controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the Pipeline Embolization Device in the treatment of recurrent, previously stented aneurysms.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-one patients with previously stented recurrent aneurysms who later underwent Pipeline Embolization Device placement (group 1) were retrospectively identified and compared with 63 patients who had treatment with the Pipeline Embolization Device with no prior stent placement (group 2). Occlusion at the latest follow-up angiogram, recurrence and retreatment rates, clinical outcome, complications, and morbidity and mortality observed after treatment with the Pipeline Embolization Device were analyzed.

RESULTS

Patient characteristics were similar between the 2 groups. The mean time from stent placement to recurrence was 25 months. Pipeline Embolization Device treatment resulted in complete aneurysm occlusion in 55.6% of patients in group 1 versus 80.4% of patients in group 2 (P = .036). The retreatment rate in group 1 was 11.1% versus 7.1% in group 2 (P = .62). The rate of good clinical outcome at the latest follow-up in group 1 was 81% versus 93.2% in group 2 (P = .1). Complications were observed in 14.3% of patients in group 1 and 9.5% of patients in group 2 (P = .684).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of the Pipeline Embolization Device in the management of previously stented aneurysms is less effective than the use of this device in nonstented aneurysms. Prior stent placement can worsen the safety and efficacy profile of this device.

摘要

背景与目的

管道栓塞装置用于复发性、先前已植入支架的脑动脉瘤治疗存在争议。本研究旨在评估管道栓塞装置治疗复发性、先前已植入支架的动脉瘤的疗效和安全性。

材料与方法

回顾性纳入21例先前已植入支架的复发性动脉瘤患者,这些患者随后接受了管道栓塞装置置入(第1组),并与63例未预先植入支架而接受管道栓塞装置治疗的患者(第2组)进行比较。分析了在最近一次随访血管造影时的闭塞情况、复发率和再治疗率、临床结局、并发症以及管道栓塞装置治疗后观察到的发病率和死亡率。

结果

两组患者的特征相似。从支架置入到复发的平均时间为25个月。管道栓塞装置治疗使第1组55.6%的患者动脉瘤完全闭塞,而第2组为80.4%(P = 0.036)。第1组的再治疗率为11.1%,第2组为7.1%(P = 0.62)。第1组在最近一次随访时良好临床结局的比例为81%,第2组为93.2%(P = 0.1)。第1组14.3%的患者和第2组9.5%的患者出现并发症(P = 0.684)。

结论

管道栓塞装置用于先前已植入支架的动脉瘤治疗,其效果不如用于未植入支架的动脉瘤。先前植入支架会使该装置的安全性和疗效降低。

相似文献

1
Pipeline Embolization Device in the Treatment of Recurrent Previously Stented Cerebral Aneurysms.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2016 May;37(5):849-55. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4613. Epub 2015 Nov 26.
2
The Use of the Pipeline Embolization Device in the Management of Recurrent Previously Coiled Cerebral Aneurysms.
Neurosurgery. 2015 Nov;77(5):692-7; discission 697. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000901.
3
4
Pipeline embolization device for recurrence of previously treated aneurysms.
Neurosurg Focus. 2017 Jun;42(6):E8. doi: 10.3171/2017.3.FOCUS1744.
7
Factors affecting recurrence and management of recurrent cerebral aneurysms after initial coiling.
Interv Neuroradiol. 2020 Jun;26(3):300-308. doi: 10.1177/1591019919901037. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
9
Resolution of cranial neuropathies following treatment of intracranial aneurysms with the Pipeline Embolization Device.
J Neurosurg. 2014 Nov;121(5):1085-92. doi: 10.3171/2014.7.JNS132677. Epub 2014 Sep 5.

引用本文的文献

2
Pipeline embolization device for aneurysm recurrence after stent-assisted coiling.
Neuroradiology. 2025 Feb;67(2):415-421. doi: 10.1007/s00234-024-03541-6. Epub 2025 Jan 20.
4
Retreatment with a pipeline embolization device for recanalized aneurysms following stent-assisted coiling embolization.
Front Neurol. 2023 Nov 3;14:1267258. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1267258. eCollection 2023.
5
Retreatment with a flow diverter for recurrent blood blister-like aneurysms after embolization: A single-center case series.
Front Neurol. 2022 Oct 6;13:1009914. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.1009914. eCollection 2022.
6
Flow Diverter in Unruptured Intracranial Vertebral Artery Dissecting Aneurysm.
Front Neurol. 2022 Jun 21;13:912863. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.912863. eCollection 2022.
9
Flow diverter stents in the treatment of recanalized intracranial aneurysms.
Interv Neuroradiol. 2021 Aug;27(4):481-489. doi: 10.1177/1591019921990507. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
10
Pipeline for previously stented basilar trunk aneurysm: a case focusing on how the pipeline should be deployed.
Chin Neurosurg J. 2018 Nov 2;4:27. doi: 10.1186/s41016-018-0134-7. eCollection 2018.

本文引用的文献

1
International retrospective study of the pipeline embolization device: a multicenter aneurysm treatment study.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015 Jan;36(1):108-15. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4111. Epub 2014 Oct 29.
3
Flow diversion versus conventional treatment for carotid cavernous aneurysms.
Stroke. 2014 Sep;45(9):2656-61. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.006247. Epub 2014 Jul 22.
4
Stent-assisted coiling versus coiling in treatment of intracranial aneurysm: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 15;9(1):e82311. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082311. eCollection 2014.
5
Analysis of complications and recurrences of aneurysm coiling with special emphasis on the stent-assisted technique.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2014 Feb;35(2):339-44. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A3658. Epub 2013 Aug 1.
6
Comparison of flow diversion and coiling in large unruptured intracranial saccular aneurysms.
Stroke. 2013 Aug;44(8):2150-4. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001785. Epub 2013 May 30.
7
Pipeline for uncoilable or failed aneurysms: results from a multicenter clinical trial.
Radiology. 2013 Jun;267(3):858-68. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13120099. Epub 2013 Feb 15.
8
Treatment of recurrent intracranial aneurysms with the Pipeline Embolization Device.
J Neurointerv Surg. 2014 Jan;6(1):19-23. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2012-010612. Epub 2013 Jan 23.
9
Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with flow diverters: a meta-analysis.
Stroke. 2013 Feb;44(2):442-7. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.678151. Epub 2013 Jan 15.
10
Single center experience with pipeline stent: feasibility, technique, and complications.
Neurosurgery. 2012 Sep;71(3):679-91; discussion 691. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e318260fe86.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验