• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞术后动脉瘤复发的管道栓塞装置

Pipeline embolization device for aneurysm recurrence after stent-assisted coiling.

作者信息

Kong Weiming, Liang Shikai, Lv Xianli

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Litang Road 168, Beijing, 102218, China.

出版信息

Neuroradiology. 2025 Feb;67(2):415-421. doi: 10.1007/s00234-024-03541-6. Epub 2025 Jan 20.

DOI:10.1007/s00234-024-03541-6
PMID:39831959
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Since the emergence of the Pipeline Embolization Device (PED), its off-label use has significantly improved the treatment effectiveness of complex intracranial aneurysms, including the treatment of recurrent aneurysms. Although PED is effective in this situation, there is still a lack of evidence-based medicine for its role in recurrent aneurysms after stent-assisted coiling. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of PED treatment for recurrent aneurysms after stent-assisted coiling.

METHODS

This study included 10 patients who underwent stent-assisted coiling but subsequently received PED treatment again due to aneurysm recurrence or rebleeding. The mean time between initial treatment and subsequent treatment is 12 months. Clinical outcomes include complications and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores, as well as evidence of complete occlusion.

RESULTS

All PEDs were successfully placed, with one case of minor perioperative complications. During the 6-month follow-up after PED implantation, 10 cases of recurrent aneurysms were completely occluded without any adverse clinical sequelae. In one case of vertebral artery aneurysm, balloon dilation was performed before placing PED due to arterial stenosis proximal to the aneurysm.

CONCLUSION

The use of PED to treat recurrent aneurysms after stent-assisted coiling is a safe and effective treatment method.

摘要

目的

自Pipeline栓塞装置(PED)出现以来,其非标签使用显著提高了复杂颅内动脉瘤的治疗效果,包括复发性动脉瘤的治疗。尽管PED在这种情况下有效,但对于其在支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞术后复发性动脉瘤中的作用仍缺乏循证医学依据。本研究的目的是评估PED治疗支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞术后复发性动脉瘤的安全性和有效性。

方法

本研究纳入了10例接受支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞但随后因动脉瘤复发或再出血而再次接受PED治疗的患者。初次治疗与后续治疗之间的平均时间为12个月。临床结果包括并发症、改良Rankin量表(mRS)评分以及完全闭塞的证据。

结果

所有PED均成功置入,围手术期有1例轻微并发症。在PED植入后的6个月随访期间,10例复发性动脉瘤完全闭塞,无任何不良临床后遗症。在1例椎动脉动脉瘤中,由于动脉瘤近端动脉狭窄,在置入PED前进行了球囊扩张。

结论

使用PED治疗支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞术后的复发性动脉瘤是一种安全有效的治疗方法。

相似文献

1
Pipeline embolization device for aneurysm recurrence after stent-assisted coiling.用于支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞术后动脉瘤复发的管道栓塞装置
Neuroradiology. 2025 Feb;67(2):415-421. doi: 10.1007/s00234-024-03541-6. Epub 2025 Jan 20.
2
Pipeline embolization device for recurrence of previously treated aneurysms.用于既往治疗过的动脉瘤复发的管道栓塞装置。
Neurosurg Focus. 2017 Jun;42(6):E8. doi: 10.3171/2017.3.FOCUS1744.
3
Pipeline-assisted coiling versus pipeline in flow diversion treatment of intracranial aneurysms.颅内动脉瘤血流导向治疗中管道辅助弹簧圈栓塞与单纯管道置入的比较
J Clin Neurosci. 2018 Dec;58:20-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2018.10.081. Epub 2018 Oct 24.
4
Comparison of Stent-Assisted Coil Embolization and the Pipeline Embolization Device for Endovascular Treatment of Ophthalmic Segment Aneurysms: A Multicenter Cohort Study.支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞术与密网支架治疗眼动脉段动脉瘤的血管内治疗比较:一项多中心队列研究
World Neurosurg. 2017 Sep;105:206-212. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.05.104. Epub 2017 May 27.
5
Comparative effectiveness analysis of Pipeline device versus coiling in unruptured aneurysms smaller than 10 mm.未破裂小于 10 毫米的动脉瘤中 Pipeline 装置与线圈治疗的比较效果分析。
J Neurosurg. 2020 Jan 1;132(1):42-50. doi: 10.3171/2018.8.JNS181080. Epub 2019 Jan 11.
6
The Use of the Pipeline Embolization Device in the Management of Recurrent Previously Coiled Cerebral Aneurysms.管道栓塞装置在复发性既往已栓塞脑动脉瘤治疗中的应用
Neurosurgery. 2015 Nov;77(5):692-7; discission 697. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000901.
7
Cost comparison of endovascular treatment of anterior circulation aneurysms with the pipeline embolization device and stent-assisted coiling.血管内治疗前循环动脉瘤中Pipeline 栓塞装置与支架辅助弹簧圈的成本比较。
Neurosurgery. 2012 Nov;71(5):944-48; discussion 948-50. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e3182690b8b.
8
Pipeline embolization device versus coiling for the treatment of large and giant unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a cost-effectiveness analysis.用于治疗大型和巨大型未破裂颅内动脉瘤的管道栓塞装置与弹簧圈栓塞术:成本效益分析
Neurosurg Focus. 2017 Jun;42(6):E6. doi: 10.3171/2017.3.FOCUS1749.
9
[Clinical efficacy of stent-assisted coil embolization for recurrent intracranial bifurcation aneurysms].支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞治疗复发性颅内分叉动脉瘤的临床疗效
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2021 Mar 1;59(3):196-202. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20200818-00652.
10
Treatment of recurrent intracranial aneurysms with the Pipeline Embolization Device.使用Pipeline栓塞装置治疗复发性颅内动脉瘤。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2014 Jan;6(1):19-23. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2012-010612. Epub 2013 Jan 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Flow diverter stents in the treatment of recanalized intracranial aneurysms.血流导向装置治疗再通颅内动脉瘤。
Interv Neuroradiol. 2021 Aug;27(4):481-489. doi: 10.1177/1591019921990507. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
2
Antiplatelet Management for Stent-Assisted Coiling and Flow Diversion of Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: A DELPHI Consensus Statement.支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞和血流导向装置治疗破裂颅内动脉瘤的抗血小板管理:DELPHI 共识声明。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2020 Oct;41(10):1856-1862. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A6814. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
3
Efficacy and Safety of Flow-Diverter Therapy for Recurrent Aneurysms after Stent-Assisted Coiling.
血流导向装置治疗支架辅助弹簧圈栓塞后复发动脉瘤的疗效和安全性。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2020 Apr;41(4):663-668. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A6476. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
4
Off-label uses of the Pipeline embolization device: a review of the literature.Pipeline栓塞装置的非标签用途:文献综述
Neurosurg Focus. 2017 Jun;42(6):E4. doi: 10.3171/2017.3.FOCUS1742.
5
Use of the Pipeline embolization device for recurrent and residual cerebral aneurysms: a safety and efficacy analysis with short-term follow-up.应用 Pipeline 栓塞装置治疗复发性和残留性颅内动脉瘤:一项短期随访的安全性和有效性分析。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2017 Dec;9(12):1208-1213. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012772. Epub 2016 Nov 25.
6
Flow-diverter devices in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: A meta-analysis and systematic review.血流导向装置治疗颅内动脉瘤的荟萃分析与系统评价
Neuroradiol J. 2016 Feb;29(1):66-71. doi: 10.1177/1971400915621321. Epub 2016 Feb 2.
7
Pipeline Embolization Device in the Treatment of Recurrent Previously Stented Cerebral Aneurysms.管道栓塞装置治疗既往已行支架置入术的复发性脑动脉瘤
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2016 May;37(5):849-55. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4613. Epub 2015 Nov 26.
8
Platelet Testing is Associated with Worse Clinical Outcomes for Patients Treated with the Pipeline Embolization Device.对于使用Pipeline栓塞装置治疗的患者,血小板检测与更差的临床结果相关。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015 Nov;36(11):2090-5. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4411. Epub 2015 Aug 6.
9
Use of flow-diverting stents as salvage treatment following failed stent-assisted embolization of intracranial aneurysms.颅内动脉瘤支架辅助栓塞失败后使用血流导向支架作为挽救治疗。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2016 Jul;8(7):692-5. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-011672. Epub 2015 Jun 3.
10
Long-Term Follow-Up Results following Elective Treatment of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms with the Pipeline Embolization Device.使用Pipeline栓塞装置对未破裂颅内动脉瘤进行择期治疗后的长期随访结果
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015 Sep;36(9):1728-34. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4329. Epub 2015 May 21.