Allen B, Edwards I R
National Toxicology Group, Dunedin.
N Z Med J. 1989 Jun 28;102(870):310-2.
This randomised single blind controlled study examines adverse reactions to standard Naprosyn (naproxen) 750 mg daily with controlled release naproxen, Naprosyn CR, 750 mg daily, in a total of 520 patients. Overall there were no major differences between the two preparations. The reporting rate of any adverse clinical event was greater in the group taking the controlled release preparation but withdrawals from medication were similar in the two groups, for whatever reason. The main finding of the study was that patients in each decile age group, mainly between 40 and 80 years, were more likely to continue on this preparation for the full 10 weeks of the trial: 57% of patients on controlled release and 46% on plain Naprosyn completed the study. Patients over 60 years, particularly females, tended to complete the study, indicating that the simpler treatment regimen without any increase in major adverse effects is useful in the elderly who are thought to be at special risk of adverse reactions from NSAIDs. In addition, a review of spontaneous reports of adverse reactions to naproxen reported nationally to the Medicines Adverse Reactions Committee shows that the pattern has not changed over the last two years during which the controlled release formulation has been available. This experience supports the acceptability of controlled release naproxen.
这项随机单盲对照研究在总共520名患者中,对每日服用750毫克标准萘普生(Naprosyn)与每日服用750毫克缓释萘普生(Naprosyn CR)的不良反应进行了研究。总体而言,两种制剂之间没有重大差异。服用缓释制剂的组中任何不良临床事件的报告率更高,但两组因任何原因停药的情况相似。该研究的主要发现是,每个十分位年龄组的患者,主要在40至80岁之间,更有可能在试验的整整10周内持续使用该制剂:服用缓释制剂的患者中有57%完成了研究,服用普通萘普生的患者中有46%完成了研究。60岁以上的患者,尤其是女性,倾向于完成研究,这表明在没有增加重大不良反应的情况下,更简单的治疗方案对被认为有非甾体抗炎药不良反应特殊风险的老年人是有用的。此外,对全国向药品不良反应委员会报告的萘普生不良反应自发报告的回顾显示,在有缓释制剂的过去两年中,这种模式没有改变。这一经验支持了缓释萘普生的可接受性。