Pettit Benjamin, Ákos Zsuzsa, Vicsek Tamás, Biro Dora
Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PS, UK.
Department of Biological Physics, Eötvös University, Pázmány Péter Sétány 1A, 1117 Budapest, Hungary; Department of Radiology, Saban Research Institute, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, 4661 Sunset Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90027, USA.
Curr Biol. 2015 Dec 7;25(23):3132-7. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.10.044. Epub 2015 Nov 27.
A key question in collective behavior is how individual differences structure animal groups, affect the flow of information, and give some group members greater weight in decisions. Depending on what factors contribute to leadership, despotic decisions could either improve decision accuracy or interfere with swarm intelligence. The mechanisms behind leadership are therefore important for understanding its functional significance. In this study, we compared pigeons' relative influence over flock direction to their solo flight characteristics. A pigeon's degree of leadership was predicted by its ground speeds from earlier solo flights, but not by the straightness of its previous solo route. By testing the birds individually after a series of flock flights, we found that leaders had learned straighter homing routes than followers, as we would expect if followers attended less to the landscape and more to conspecifics. We repeated the experiment from three homing sites using multiple independent flocks and found individual consistency in leadership and speed. Our results suggest that the leadership hierarchies observed in previous studies could arise from differences in the birds' typical speeds. Rather than reflecting social preferences that optimize group decisions, leadership may be an inevitable consequence of heterogeneous flight characteristics within self-organized flocks. We also found that leaders learn faster and become better navigators, even if leadership is not initially due to navigational ability. The roles that individuals fall into during collective motion might therefore have far-reaching effects on how they learn about the environment and use social information.
群体行为中的一个关键问题是个体差异如何构建动物群体、影响信息流动,并使一些群体成员在决策中具有更大的权重。根据导致领导力的因素不同,专制决策可能会提高决策准确性,也可能会干扰群体智能。因此,领导力背后的机制对于理解其功能意义至关重要。在本研究中,我们将鸽子对鸟群方向的相对影响与其单独飞行特征进行了比较。一只鸽子的领导程度可由其早期单独飞行的地面速度预测,但不能由其先前单独飞行路线的直线度预测。在一系列群体飞行后对鸟类进行单独测试时,我们发现领导者比跟随者学习到更直的归巢路线,正如我们所预期的,如果跟随者较少关注地形而更多关注同种个体。我们从三个归巢地点使用多个独立鸟群重复了该实验,并发现了领导力和速度方面的个体一致性。我们的结果表明,先前研究中观察到的领导力等级可能源于鸟类典型速度的差异。领导力可能不是反映优化群体决策的社会偏好,而是自组织鸟群中飞行特征异质性的必然结果。我们还发现,即使领导力最初并非源于导航能力,领导者学习速度更快且成为更好的导航者。因此,个体在集体运动中所扮演的角色可能会对它们了解环境和利用社会信息的方式产生深远影响。