Pucci Giacomo, Ranalli Maria Giovanna, Battista Francesca, Schillaci Giuseppe
From the Dipartimento di Medicina (G.P., F.B., G.S.) and Dipartimento di Scienze Politiche (M.G.R.), Università di Perugia, Perugia, Italy; and Struttura Complessa di Medicina Interna, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Terni, Terni, Italy (G.P., F.B., G.S.).
Hypertension. 2016 Feb;67(2):316-24. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.115.06467. Epub 2015 Nov 30.
β-Blockers are less effective than other antihypertensive drug classes in reducing central systolic blood pressure (cSBP) as compared with peripheral SBP (pSBP). Whether this effect is less pronounced with vasodilating β-blockers (VBB) when compared with nonvasodilating β-blockers (NVBB) remains unsettled. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials exploring the effects of β-blockers on both pSBP and cSBP in hypertension. We selected 20 studies, for a total of 32 treatment arms (n=21 for NVBB, n=11 for VBB) and 1263 participants (n=962 for NVBB, n=301 for VBB). pSBP decreased from 150 to 133 mm Hg for NVBB and from 145 to 134 mm Hg for VBB. cSBP decreased from 137 to 126 mm Hg for NVBB and from 132 to 123 mm Hg for VBB. SBP amplification (pSBP-cSBP) decreased significantly under VBB (-5.6 mm Hg; 95% confidence interval, -7.8, -3.4 mm Hg), but not under NVBB (-1.1 mm Hg; 95% confidence interval, -3.4, +1.2 mm Hg; P<0.01 versus NVBB). There was high heterogeneity both within and between β-blockers subclasses. In a meta-regression model, the weighted difference in treatment-induced changes in SBP amplification between NVBB and VBB lost its significance after adjustment for mean age and baseline pSBP and heart rate (-2.9±2.3 mm Hg; P=0.22) and was almost abolished after adjustment for treatment-induced heart rate changes (-0.1±0.5 mm Hg; P=0.78). In conclusion, NVBBs, but not VBBs, determine a lower reduction in cSBP than in pSBP. However, the difference in treatment-induced SBP amplification changes between NVBB and VBB is nearly abolished after accounting for differences in heart rate changes.
与外周收缩压(pSBP)相比,β受体阻滞剂在降低中心收缩压(cSBP)方面比其他抗高血压药物类别效果更差。与非血管扩张性β受体阻滞剂(NVBB)相比,血管扩张性β受体阻滞剂(VBB)的这种效果是否不那么明显仍未确定。我们对探索β受体阻滞剂对高血压患者pSBP和cSBP影响的随机试验进行了系统评价和荟萃分析。我们选择了20项研究,共有32个治疗组(NVBB组21个,VBB组11个)和1263名参与者(NVBB组962名,VBB组301名)。NVBB组的pSBP从150 mmHg降至133 mmHg,VBB组从145 mmHg降至134 mmHg。NVBB组的cSBP从137 mmHg降至126 mmHg,VBB组从132 mmHg降至123 mmHg。VBB组下收缩压放大值(pSBP - cSBP)显著降低(-5.6 mmHg;95%置信区间,-7.8,-3.4 mmHg),而NVBB组未降低(-1.1 mmHg;95%置信区间,-3.4,+1.2 mmHg;与NVBB组相比,P<0.01)。β受体阻滞剂亚类内部和之间均存在高度异质性。在一个荟萃回归模型中,调整平均年龄、基线pSBP和心率后,NVBB组和VBB组治疗引起的收缩压放大值变化的加权差异失去了显著性(-2.9±2.3 mmHg;P = 0.22),调整治疗引起的心率变化后差异几乎消失(-0.1±0.5 mmHg;P = 0.78)。总之,NVBB组而非VBB组导致cSBP的降低幅度低于pSBP。然而,在考虑心率变化差异后,NVBB组和VBB组治疗引起的收缩压放大值变化差异几乎消失。