Zuo Shuang, Wang Honglin, Wang Benrong
Department of Emergency, The Second People's Hospital of Hefei Anhui Province, China.
Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015 Sep 15;8(9):15182-9. eCollection 2015.
Numerous studies have evaluated the association between the MCP-1-2518A/G polymorphism and coronary artery disease (CAD) risk; however, the actual association is controversial. To derive a more precise estimation of the relationship in Chinese population, we performed this meta-analysis.
We searched the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and CNKI databases to identify studies that examined the association between the MCP-1-2518A/Gpolymorphism and the risk of CAD. We estimated the pooled odds ratio with its 95% confidence interval to assess this association.
Seven studies containing 4024 Chinese subjects (2260 patients with CAD and 1764 controls) were included in this meta-analysis. MCP-1-2518A/G polymorphism was not found to be significantly associated with CAD risk in all comparisons (for G vs A: OR=1.10, 95% CI=0.92-1.32; for AG+GG vs AA: OR=1.10, 95% CI=0.79-1.53; for GG vs AA+AG: OR=1.05, 95% CI=0.91-1.21; for GG vs AA: OR=1.12, 95% CI=0.82-1.54; for AG vs AA: OR=1.05, 95% CI=0.76-1.47). Similarly, no associations were found in subgroup analysis based on source of control and endpoint.
the MCP-1-2518A/G polymorphism was not associated with the risk of CAD in Chinese population.
众多研究评估了MCP - 1 - 2518A/G多态性与冠状动脉疾病(CAD)风险之间的关联;然而,实际关联存在争议。为了更精确地估计中国人群中的这种关系,我们进行了这项荟萃分析。
我们检索了PubMed、Embase、Web of Science和CNKI数据库,以识别研究MCP - 1 - 2518A/G多态性与CAD风险之间关联的研究。我们估计了合并优势比及其95%置信区间来评估这种关联。
本荟萃分析纳入了7项研究,共4024名中国受试者(2260例CAD患者和1764例对照)。在所有比较中,未发现MCP - 1 - 2518A/G多态性与CAD风险有显著关联(G对A:OR = 1.10,95%CI = 0.92 - 1.32;AG + GG对AA:OR = 1.10,95%CI = 0.79 - 1.53;GG对AA + AG:OR = 1.05,95%CI = 0.91 - 1.21;GG对AA:OR = 1.12,95%CI = 0.82 - 1.54;AG对AA:OR = 1.05,95%CI = 0.76 - 1.47)。同样,在基于对照来源和终点的亚组分析中未发现关联。
在中国人群中,MCP - 1 - 2518A/G多态性与CAD风险无关。