Suppr超能文献

锥形束CT用于确定乳腺癌切缘:初步经验及其与乳腺X线摄影和标本射线照相的比较

Cone beam CT for determining breast cancer margin: an initial experience and its comparison with mammography and specimen radiograph.

作者信息

Yao Juan, Shaw Chris, Lai C J, Rong John, Wang Jian, Liu Wenya

机构信息

The Imaging Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University Urumqi 830054, China.

MD Anderson Cancer Center, The University of Texas TX 77030, USA.

出版信息

Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015 Sep 15;8(9):15206-13. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess the ability of cone beam CT (CBCT) in determining the breast cancer margin using, to compare the results with mammography and specimen radiography, and to explore the clinical potential of CBCT for breast imaging.

METHODS

Specimens of 46 breast cancer patients were imaged by using a prototype CBCT system. Each patient underwent mammography, CBCT and X-ray of breast surgical specimen within 6 months. Images of mammography, breast surgical specimen radiography and CBCT were evaluated by an experienced radiologist. Indicators, such as: morphology, glitch, density, invasion, structural distortion and calcification, were observed.

RESULT

There was no significant difference of the calcification, glitch and morphology among three methods. However, there was significant difference in indicators of breast tumor invasion among three methods. There was statistical significance in detecting invasions of breast cancer cells in peripheral tissues among three methods.

CONCLUSION

CBCT shows no superiority over mammography and specimen radiography in determining tumor's outline and detecting calcification. On the other hand, CBCT demonstrates its advantage in determining the 3 dimensional position of a lesion which could be a potential clinical application in future practices of breast imaging.

摘要

目的

评估锥形束CT(CBCT)在确定乳腺癌切缘方面的能力,将结果与乳腺X线摄影和标本射线摄影进行比较,并探索CBCT在乳腺成像中的临床潜力。

方法

使用原型CBCT系统对46例乳腺癌患者的标本进行成像。每位患者在6个月内接受了乳腺X线摄影、CBCT和乳腺手术标本的X线检查。由一位经验丰富的放射科医生对乳腺X线摄影、乳腺手术标本射线摄影和CBCT的图像进行评估。观察钙化、毛刺、密度、浸润、结构扭曲和钙化等指标。

结果

三种方法在钙化、毛刺和形态方面无显著差异。然而,三种方法在乳腺肿瘤浸润指标上存在显著差异。三种方法在检测外周组织中乳腺癌细胞浸润方面具有统计学意义。

结论

在确定肿瘤轮廓和检测钙化方面,CBCT并不优于乳腺X线摄影和标本射线摄影。另一方面,CBCT在确定病变的三维位置方面显示出其优势,这可能是未来乳腺成像实践中的一种潜在临床应用。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

9
Dedicated breast CT: initial clinical experience.专用乳腺CT:初步临床经验。
Radiology. 2008 Mar;246(3):725-33. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2463070410. Epub 2008 Jan 14.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验