Wang Xuefeng, Dong Liyang, Liang Yong, Ni Hongchang, Tang Jun, Xu Chengcheng, Zhou Yuepeng, Su Yuting, Wang Jun, Chen Deyu, Mao Chaoming
Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University Zhenjiang 212001, P. R. China ; Institute of Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University Zhenjiang 212001, P. R. China ; Department of Rheumatology, The Affiliated People's Hospital, Jiangsu University Zhenjiang 212002, Jiangsu, P. R. China.
Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University Zhenjiang 212001, P. R. China ; Institute of Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University Zhenjiang 212001, P. R. China.
Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015 Sep 15;8(9):16158-66. eCollection 2015.
To compare the cytokine profile in RA patients and healthy control by using two methods-FlowCytomix assay and traditional ELISA.
Cytokine levels were evaluated by FlowCytomix assay and ELISA in serum and supernatants of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) cultures with and without stimulation by phytohaemagglutinin (PHA).
The levels of IL-6, IL-1β, and TNF-α were significantly higher in sera of RA patients than those of healthy controls. The levels of IL-22, IL-6, IL-1β, TNF-α, and IL-10 were higher in unstimulated PBMC culture supernatant of RA patients than those of healthy controls. PHA stimulation significantly increased the production of proinflammatory cytokines from PBMC with RA patients. Compared with detectable cytokine levels in sera, cytokine concentration in the supernatant of PBMCs was remarkably higher. FlowCytomix and ELISA showed significant correlation in detecting cytokines. However, the FlowCytomix assay detected more cytokines than ELISA.
The supernatant of PBMCs provide a fine condition for the study of cytokine production because of the lack of interference factors in sera. The FlowCytomix assay is more sensitive than ELISA in detecting cytokines from RA patients. Multiple cytokine signatures using FlowCytomix assay may represent a more realistic approach in the future of personalized medicine in RA.
采用流式细胞仪混合检测法和传统酶联免疫吸附测定法(ELISA)比较类风湿关节炎(RA)患者与健康对照者的细胞因子谱。
通过流式细胞仪混合检测法和ELISA评估血清及外周血单个核细胞(PBMC)培养上清液中细胞因子水平,PBMC培养分为有植物血凝素(PHA)刺激和无PHA刺激两种情况。
RA患者血清中白细胞介素-6(IL-6)、白细胞介素-1β(IL-1β)和肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)水平显著高于健康对照者。RA患者未刺激的PBMC培养上清液中IL-22、IL-6、IL-1β、TNF-α和IL-10水平高于健康对照者。PHA刺激显著增加了RA患者PBMC促炎细胞因子的产生。与血清中可检测到的细胞因子水平相比,PBMC上清液中的细胞因子浓度明显更高。流式细胞仪混合检测法和ELISA在检测细胞因子方面显示出显著相关性。然而,流式细胞仪混合检测法比ELISA检测到更多的细胞因子。
由于血清中缺乏干扰因素,PBMC上清液为细胞因子产生的研究提供了良好条件。流式细胞仪混合检测法在检测RA患者细胞因子方面比ELISA更敏感。使用流式细胞仪混合检测法的多种细胞因子特征可能代表了RA个性化医学未来更现实的方法。