Allen-Worthington Krystal H, Brice Angela K, Marx James O, Hankenson F Claire
University Laboratory Animal Resources, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
University Laboratory Animal Resources, University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania, USA; Department of Pathobiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2015 Nov;54(6):769-78.
Compassion, professional ethics, and public sensitivity require that animals are euthanized humanely and appropriately under both planned and emergent situations. According to the 2013 AVMA Guidelines for the Euthanasia of Animals, intraperitoneal injection of ethanol is "acceptable with conditions" for use in mice. Because only limited information regarding this technique is available, we sought to evaluate ethanol by using ECG and high-definition video recording. Mice (n = 85) and rats (n = 16) were treated with intraperitoneal ethanol (70% or 100%), a positive-control agent (pentobarbital-phenytoin combination [Pe/Ph]), or a negative-control agent (saline solution). After injection, animals were assessed for behavioral and physiologic responses. Pain-assessment techniques in mice demonstrated that intraperitoneal injection of ethanol was not more painful than was intraperitoneal Pe/Ph. Median time to loss of consciousness for all mice that received ethanol or Pe/Ph was 45 s. Median time to respiratory arrest was 2.75, 2.25, and 2.63 min, and time (mean ± SE) to cardiac arrest was 6.04 ± 1.3, 2.96 ± 0.6, and 4.03 ± 0.5 min for 70% ethanol, 100% ethanol, and Pe/Ph, respectively. No mouse that received ethanol or Pe/Ph regained consciousness. Although successful in mice, intraperitoneal ethanol at the doses tested (9.2 to 20.1 g/kg) was unsuitable for euthanasia of rats (age, 7 to 8 wk) because of the volume needed and prolonged time to respiratory effects. For mice, intraperitoneal injection of 70% or 100% ethanol induced rapid and irreversible loss of consciousness, followed by death, and should be considered as "acceptable with conditions."
出于同情、职业道德和公众敏感度的考虑,无论是在计划内还是紧急情况下,都需要对动物进行人道且适当的安乐死。根据2013年美国兽医协会(AVMA)的《动物安乐死指南》,腹腔注射乙醇在“特定条件下”可用于小鼠安乐死。由于关于该技术的可用信息有限,我们试图通过心电图和高清视频记录来评估乙醇。将小鼠(n = 85)和大鼠(n = 16)分别用腹腔注射乙醇(70%或100%)、阳性对照剂(戊巴比妥-苯妥英组合[Pe/Ph])或阴性对照剂(生理盐水)进行处理。注射后,对动物的行为和生理反应进行评估。小鼠的疼痛评估技术表明,腹腔注射乙醇的疼痛程度并不高于腹腔注射Pe/Ph。所有接受乙醇或Pe/Ph的小鼠失去意识的中位时间为45秒。呼吸停止的中位时间分别为2.75、2.25和2.63分钟,70%乙醇、100%乙醇和Pe/Ph导致心脏骤停的时间(均值±标准误)分别为6.04±1.3、2.96±0.6和4.03±0.5分钟。没有接受乙醇或Pe/Ph的小鼠恢复意识。虽然腹腔注射乙醇在小鼠中取得了成功,但在所测试的剂量(9.2至20.1 g/kg)下,由于所需注射体积以及呼吸效应的时间延长,并不适合用于7至8周龄大鼠的安乐死。对于小鼠,腹腔注射70%或100%乙醇可诱导快速且不可逆的意识丧失,随后死亡,应被视为“在特定条件下可接受”。