Chakraborty Navjyoti, Singh Navneet, Kaur Kanwaljeet, Raghuram Nandula
University School of Biotechnology, Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University Dwarka, New Delhi, India.
Front Plant Sci. 2015 Nov 18;6:1000. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.01000. eCollection 2015.
G-protein signaling components have been implicated in some individual stress responses in Arabidopsis, but have not been comprehensively evaluated at the genetic and biochemical level. Stress emerged as the largest functional category in our whole transcriptome analyses of knock-out mutants of GCR1 and/or GPA1 in Arabidopsis (Chakraborty et al., 2015a,b). This led us to ask whether G-protein signaling components offer converging points in the plant's response to multiple abiotic stresses. In order to test this hypothesis, we carried out detailed analysis of the abiotic stress category in the present study, which revealed 144 differentially expressed genes (DEGs), spanning a wide range of abiotic stresses, including heat, cold, salt, light stress etc. Only 10 of these DEGs are shared by all the three mutants, while the single mutants (GCR1/GPA1) shared more DEGs between themselves than with the double mutant (GCR1-GPA1). RT-qPCR validation of 28 of these genes spanning different stresses revealed identical regulation of the DEGs shared between the mutants. We also validated the effects of cold, heat and salt stresses in all the 3 mutants and WT on % germination, root and shoot length, relative water content, proline content, lipid peroxidation and activities of catalase, ascorbate peroxidase and superoxide dismutase. All the 3 mutants showed evidence of stress tolerance, especially to cold, followed by heat and salt, in terms of all the above parameters. This clearly shows the role of GCR1 and GPA1 in mediating the plant's response to multiple abiotic stresses for the first time, especially cold, heat and salt stresses. This also implies a role for classical G-protein signaling pathways in stress sensitivity in the normal plants of Arabidopsis. This is also the first genetic and biochemical evidence of abiotic stress tolerance rendered by knock-out mutation of GCR1 and/or GPA1. This suggests that G-protein signaling pathway could offer novel common targets for the development of tolerance/resistance to multiple abiotic stresses.
G蛋白信号转导组件已被证明参与拟南芥的一些个体应激反应,但尚未在基因和生化水平上进行全面评估。在我们对拟南芥中GCR1和/或GPA1基因敲除突变体的全转录组分析中,应激反应成为最大的功能类别(Chakraborty等人,2015a,b)。这促使我们思考G蛋白信号转导组件在植物对多种非生物胁迫的反应中是否提供了汇聚点。为了验证这一假设,我们在本研究中对非生物胁迫类别进行了详细分析,结果显示有144个差异表达基因(DEG),涵盖了广泛的非生物胁迫,包括热、冷、盐、光胁迫等。其中只有10个DEG在所有三个突变体中都存在,而单个突变体(GCR1/GPA1)之间共享的DEG比它们与双突变体(GCR1-GPA1)之间共享的更多。对这些跨越不同胁迫的28个基因进行RT-qPCR验证,结果显示突变体之间共享的DEG具有相同的调控模式。我们还验证了冷、热和盐胁迫对所有3个突变体和野生型在发芽率、根和茎长度、相对含水量、脯氨酸含量、脂质过氧化以及过氧化氢酶、抗坏血酸过氧化物酶和超氧化物歧化酶活性方面的影响。就上述所有参数而言,所有3个突变体都表现出应激耐受性的证据,尤其是对冷胁迫,其次是热胁迫和盐胁迫。这首次明确显示了GCR1和GPA1在介导植物对多种非生物胁迫,尤其是冷、热和盐胁迫的反应中的作用。这也意味着经典G蛋白信号转导途径在拟南芥正常植株的胁迫敏感性中发挥作用。这也是GCR1和/或GPA1基因敲除突变赋予非生物胁迫耐受性的首个遗传和生化证据。这表明G蛋白信号转导途径可能为开发对多种非生物胁迫的耐受性/抗性提供新的共同靶点。