Neuhaus C, Röhrig R, Hofmann G, Klemm S, Neuhaus S, Hofer S, Thalheimer M, Weigand M A, Lichtenstern C
Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
Abteilung Medizinische Informatik, Carl von Ossietzky Universität, Oldenburg, Deutschland.
Anaesthesist. 2015 Dec;64(12):911-926. doi: 10.1007/s00101-015-0115-6.
The concept of patient safety is more of a presence in modern day medicine than ever before. All measures and processes aiming at preempting and preventing critical incidents and accidents in patient care are collectively grouped under this concept. With the Declaration of Helsinki in 2010 modern anesthesiology has undertaken a fundamental role in the clinical implementation and perioperative clinicians are confronted with a multitude of theories, models, methods and tools targeted at improving or facilitating optimized patient safety. One of the biggest challenges lies in their synergistic combination to create a functioning concept for perioperative risk management while also incorporating individual strengths and weaknesses. The aim of the present paper is to provide a structured overview of the various components presently available for increasing perioperative patient safety.
患者安全的概念在现代医学中比以往任何时候都更为凸显。所有旨在预防和防止患者护理中严重事件及事故的措施和流程都被归在这一概念之下。随着2010年《赫尔辛基宣言》的发布，现代麻醉学在临床实践中发挥了重要作用，围手术期临床医生面临着众多旨在改善或促进优化患者安全的理论、模型、方法和工具。最大的挑战之一在于将它们协同结合起来，以形成一个适用于围手术期风险管理的有效概念，同时还要兼顾个体的优势与不足。本文旨在对目前可用于提高围手术期患者安全的各个组成部分进行结构化概述。
