• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

维生素K拮抗剂抗凝质量的中心相关决定因素:一项前瞻性多中心评估

Center-Related Determinants of VKA Anticoagulation Quality: A Prospective, Multicenter Evaluation.

作者信息

Tosetto Alberto, Manotti Cesare, Marongiu Francesco

机构信息

Department of Hematology, S. Bortolo Hospital, Vicenza, Italy.

Hemostasis Center, Fidenza-Vaio Hospital, Fidenza, Italy.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2015 Dec 4;10(12):e0144314. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144314. eCollection 2015.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0144314
PMID:26636337
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4670074/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Center-specific TTR (c-TTR) is a measure reporting the mean patient TTR within an anticoagulation clinic describing the quality of anticoagulant monitoring offered by that clinic. c-TTR has a considerable between-center variation, but its determinants are poorly understood.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed at evaluating which clinical, procedural or laboratory factors could be associated with c-TTR variability in a multicenter, observational cross-sectional study over a five-year period.

PATIENTS/METHODS: Data from 832,204 individual patients followed for VKA therapy in 292 Centers affiliated with the Italian Federation of Anticoagulation Clinics (FCSA) were analyzed. c-TTR was computed based on the TTR of patients followed at each Center, and a mixed linear regression model was used for a predefined set of explanatory variables.

RESULTS

The Center next-visit interval ratio (the mean number of days after a visit with an INR outside the therapeutic range, divided by the days after a visit with an INR within the therapeutic range), the Center mean patient INR and the Center laboratory performance at EQA proficiency testing were the only variables that were independently associated with c-TTR (β-coefficients -17.32, 9.67, and -0.11, respectively; r2 = 0.635).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that c-TTR associates with proactive strategies aimed at keeping patients very close to their target INR with a prompt re-evaluation of those patients with under- or over-therapeutic INR.

摘要

背景

特定中心的凝血酶原时间比值(c-TTR)是一种衡量指标,用于报告抗凝门诊内患者凝血酶原时间比值的平均值,描述该门诊提供的抗凝监测质量。c-TTR在不同中心之间存在相当大的差异,但其决定因素尚不清楚。

目的

我们旨在评估在一项为期五年的多中心观察性横断面研究中,哪些临床、程序或实验室因素可能与c-TTR变异性相关。

患者/方法:分析了意大利抗凝门诊联合会(FCSA)下属292个中心的832204例接受维生素K拮抗剂(VKA)治疗患者的个体数据。c-TTR基于每个中心随访患者的凝血酶原时间比值计算得出,并使用混合线性回归模型对一组预先定义的解释变量进行分析。

结果

中心下次就诊间隔比(国际标准化比值(INR)超出治疗范围后就诊的平均天数除以INR在治疗范围内后就诊的天数)、中心患者平均INR以及中心在室间质量评价能力验证中的实验室表现是仅有的与c-TTR独立相关的变量(β系数分别为-17.32、9.67和-0.11;r2 = 0.635)。

结论

这些发现表明,c-TTR与旨在使患者非常接近其目标INR并及时重新评估INR低于或高于治疗范围患者的积极策略相关。

相似文献

1
Center-Related Determinants of VKA Anticoagulation Quality: A Prospective, Multicenter Evaluation.维生素K拮抗剂抗凝质量的中心相关决定因素:一项前瞻性多中心评估
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 4;10(12):e0144314. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144314. eCollection 2015.
2
Identifying potential predictors of high-quality oral anticoagulation assessed by time in therapeutic international normalized ratio range: a prospective, long-term, single-center, observational study.通过治疗国际标准化比值范围时间评估高质量口服抗凝治疗的潜在预测因素:一项前瞻性、长期、单中心、观察性研究。
Clin Ther. 2012 Jul;34(7):1511-20. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2012.06.002. Epub 2012 Jun 19.
3
[Quality control of oral anticoagulant therapy in Primary Care in Madrid City, Spain: CHRONOS-TAO study].[西班牙马德里市初级保健中口服抗凝治疗的质量控制:CHRONOS-TAO研究]
Med Clin (Barc). 2015 Sep 7;145(5):192-7. doi: 10.1016/j.medcli.2014.09.023. Epub 2014 Nov 26.
4
Improving Anticoagulation Measurement Novel Warfarin Composite Measure.改进抗凝测量:新型华法林综合测量法
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2015 Nov;8(6):600-7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.115.001789.
5
Improving quality measurement for anticoagulation: adding international normalized ratio variability to percent time in therapeutic range.改善抗凝治疗的质量测量:在治疗范围内的时间百分比中加入国际标准化比值变异性。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2014 Sep;7(5):664-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.114.000804. Epub 2014 Sep 2.
6
Evaluation of warfarin management with international normalized ratio self-testing and online remote monitoring and management plus low-dose vitamin k with genomic considerations: a pilot study.基于国际标准化比值自我检测、在线远程监测与管理以及低剂量维生素K并考虑基因组因素的华法林管理评估:一项试点研究。
Pharmacotherapy. 2013 Nov;33(11):1136-46. doi: 10.1002/phar.1343. Epub 2013 Aug 22.
7
Defining time in therapeutic range for busy clinicians: frequency of dose changes is a good surrogate marker to identify patients with suboptimal anticoagulation with warfarin.为忙碌的临床医生定义治疗范围内的时间:剂量变化频率是识别华法林抗凝效果欠佳患者的良好替代指标。
Thromb Res. 2014 Sep;134(3):584-6. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2014.06.024. Epub 2014 Jul 6.
8
Determinants of oral anticoagulation control in new warfarin patients: analysis using data from Clinical Practice Research Datalink.新华法林患者口服抗凝控制的决定因素:来自临床实践研究数据库的数据分析。
Thromb Res. 2015 Aug;136(2):250-60. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2015.06.007. Epub 2015 Jun 9.
9
A simple method to identify patients on long-term warfarin who may derive the most benefit from new oral anticoagulants.一种识别长期服用华法林且可能从新型口服抗凝剂中获益最大的患者的简单方法。
Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2014 Dec;25(8):812-5. doi: 10.1097/MBC.0000000000000148.
10
Good quality of oral anticoagulation treatment in general practice using international normalised ratio point of care testing.在基层医疗中使用国际标准化比值即时检测进行高质量的口服抗凝治疗。
Dan Med J. 2015 Feb;62(2).

引用本文的文献

1
Differences in the quality of oral anticoagulation therapy with vitamin K antagonists in German GP practices - results of the cluster-randomized PICANT trial (Primary Care Management for Optimized Antithrombotic Treatment).德国全科医生诊所中维生素 K 拮抗剂口服抗凝治疗质量的差异 - 集群随机 PICANT 试验(优化抗血栓治疗的初级保健管理)的结果。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Aug 1;19(1):539. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4372-y.
2
The effect of management models on thromboembolic and bleeding rates in anticoagulated patients: an ecological study.管理模式对抗凝患者血栓栓塞和出血率的影响:一项生态学研究。
Intern Emerg Med. 2019 Nov;14(8):1307-1315. doi: 10.1007/s11739-019-02148-7. Epub 2019 Jul 15.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Quality of vitamin K antagonist control and outcomes in atrial fibrillation patients: a meta-analysis and meta-regression.维生素 K 拮抗剂控制质量与心房颤动患者结局的关系:一项荟萃分析和荟萃回归。
Thromb J. 2014 Jun 24;12:14. doi: 10.1186/1477-9560-12-14. eCollection 2014.
2
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of new oral anticoagulants with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of randomised trials.新型口服抗凝剂与华法林治疗心房颤动患者的疗效和安全性比较:随机试验的荟萃分析。
Lancet. 2014 Mar 15;383(9921):955-62. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62343-0. Epub 2013 Dec 4.
3
Edoxaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation.
Optimizing quality care for the oral vitamin K antagonists (VKAs).
优化口服维生素 K 拮抗剂(VKAs)的质量护理。
Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2018 Nov 30;2018(1):332-338. doi: 10.1182/asheducation-2018.1.332.
4
American Society of Hematology 2018 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: optimal management of anticoagulation therapy.美国血液学会 2018 年静脉血栓栓塞症管理指南:抗凝治疗的最佳管理。
Blood Adv. 2018 Nov 27;2(22):3257-3291. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2018024893.
5
Direct oral anticoagulants: what can we learn?直接口服抗凝剂:我们能学到什么?
Intern Emerg Med. 2018 Oct;13(7):989-992. doi: 10.1007/s11739-018-1811-4. Epub 2018 Mar 2.
依度沙班与华法林用于房颤患者。
N Engl J Med. 2013 Nov 28;369(22):2093-104. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1310907. Epub 2013 Nov 19.
4
Apixaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation according to prior warfarin use: results from the Apixaban for Reduction in Stroke and Other Thromboembolic Events in Atrial Fibrillation trial.依先前华法林使用情况评估的房颤患者中阿哌沙班与华法林的比较:来自房颤患者中应用阿哌沙班减少卒中和其他血栓栓塞事件的临床试验结果。
Am Heart J. 2013 Sep;166(3):549-58. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2013.05.016. Epub 2013 Jul 25.
5
Factors affecting quality of anticoagulation control among patients with atrial fibrillation on warfarin: the SAMe-TT₂R₂ score.华法林抗凝治疗的心房颤动患者抗凝控制质量的影响因素:SAMe-TT₂R₂评分。
Chest. 2013 Nov;144(5):1555-1563. doi: 10.1378/chest.13-0054.
6
Impact of global geographic region on time in therapeutic range on warfarin anticoagulant therapy: data from the ROCKET AF clinical trial.全球地理区域对华法林抗凝治疗治疗范围内时间的影响:来自 ROCKET AF 临床试验的数据。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2013 Feb 19;2(1):e000067. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.112.000067.
7
Variation in warfarin dose adjustment practice is responsible for differences in the quality of anticoagulation control between centers and countries: an analysis of patients receiving warfarin in the randomized evaluation of long-term anticoagulation therapy (RE-LY) trial.华法林剂量调整实践的差异是导致不同中心和国家抗凝控制质量差异的原因:RE-LY 试验中接受华法林治疗的患者分析。
Circulation. 2012 Nov 6;126(19):2309-16. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.101808. Epub 2012 Oct 1.
8
Oral anticoagulant therapy: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.口服抗凝治疗:抗血栓治疗和血栓预防,第 9 版:美国胸科医师学会基于证据的临床实践指南。
Chest. 2012 Feb;141(2 Suppl):e44S-e88S. doi: 10.1378/chest.11-2292.
9
INR targets and site-level anticoagulation control: results from the Veterans AffaiRs Study to Improve Anticoagulation (VARIA).INR 目标值与部位相关的抗凝控制:来自退伍军人事务部改善抗凝研究(VARIA)的结果。
J Thromb Haemost. 2012 Apr;10(4):590-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2012.04649.x.
10
Quality of individual INR control and the risk of stroke and bleeding events in atrial fibrillation patients: a nested case control analysis of the ACTIVE W study.个体 INR 控制质量与房颤患者卒中与出血事件风险:ACTIVE W 研究的巢式病例对照分析。
Thromb Res. 2012 Jun;129(6):715-9. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2011.08.024. Epub 2011 Sep 15.