Schwartz Rachel, McMahon Sarah, Broadnax Jesica
Health Soc Work. 2015 Nov;40(4):275-82. doi: 10.1093/hsw/hlv064.
This article presents a comprehensive review of information available on campus Web sites at all four-year colleges and universities in New Jersey. This study used a descriptive, content analysis methodology with a sample that consisted of 28 college and university Web pages. To evaluate the Web sites, ecological approaches were rated with a checklist created to document the presence and extent of information about sexual assault, including five key areas: (1) general information about sexual assault, (2) the availability of services for students, (3) information about how to report an incident of sexual assault, (4) whether there was a department exclusively dedicated to the school's response to sexual assault, and (5) information about the existence of a policy prohibiting sexual assault on campus. Almost all of the schools provided policies and information about services for students. However, the comprehensiveness of the information and the ease of finding it varied greatly by campus. The article concludes with a discussion of the implications for social workers and those responding to survivors of sexual assault on a college campus.
本文全面回顾了新泽西州所有四年制学院和大学的校园网站上的可用信息。本研究采用描述性内容分析方法，样本包括28个学院和大学的网页。为了评估这些网站，采用一份清单对生态方法进行评分，该清单旨在记录有关性侵犯信息的存在情况和范围，包括五个关键领域：（1）性侵犯的一般信息，（2）为学生提供的服务，（3）如何报告性侵犯事件的信息，（4）是否有专门负责学校对性侵犯事件应对的部门，以及（5）关于校园内禁止性侵犯政策的存在情况的信息。几乎所有学校都提供了政策和学生服务信息。然而，信息的全面性以及查找信息的难易程度因校园而异。文章最后讨论了对社会工作者以及应对大学校园中性侵犯幸存者的人员的启示。
