Santos-Antunes João, Cardoso Hélder, Lopes Susana, Marques Margarida, Nunes Amadeu C R, Macedo Guilherme
João Santos-Antunes, Hélder Cardoso, Susana Lopes, Margarida Marques, Amadeu CR Nunes, Guilherme Macedo, Gastroenterology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Hospital de São João, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal.
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Nov 28;21(44):12660-6. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i44.12660.
To analyze therapeutic changes in Crohn's disease (CD) patients following video capsule endoscopy (VCE) and to assess the usefulness of Lewis score and the Patency Capsule.
Patency Capsule was performed in every patient that had indication for VCE, and those with negative patency did not undergo VCE. Patients with established CD that underwent VCE between January 2011 and February 2014 were selected for this study; those with suspected CD were excluded, independent of VCE results, since our purpose was to address differences in therapeutic regimen in CD patients before and after VCE. Patients with inconclusive VCE were also excluded. Patients had to be free of non-steroidal anti-inflammatories for at least 1 mo. Those patients who met these criteria were allocated into one of three groups: Staging group (asymptomatic CD patients that underwent VCE for staging of CD), Flare group (patients with active CD), or Post-op group (CD patients evaluated for post-operative recurrence). Lewis score was calculated for every VCE procedure. Statistical analysis was performed to address the impact of VCE findings on the therapeutic management of CD patients and to evaluate the utility of the Lewis score.
From a total of 542 VCEs, 135 were performed in patients with CD. Patency capsule excluded nearly 25% of the patients who were supposed to undergo VCE. No videocapsule retention during VCE was reported. From these 135 patients, 29 were excluded because CD diagnosis was not established at the time of VCE. Therefore, a total of 106 patients were included in the final analysis. From these, the majority were in the Staging group (n = 73, 69%), and the remaining were in the Flare (n = 23, 22%) or Post-op (n = 10, 9%) group. Median time between diagnosis and VCE was 5.5 years. Overall, VCE determined changes in the treatment of 40% of patients: only 21% remained free of immunosuppressors after VCE compared to 44% before VCE (P < 0.001). The differences in therapy before and after VCE achieved statistical significance in the Staging and Flare groups. In addition, patients were significantly different when stratified regarding time since diagnosis to the date of VCE. A higher Lewis score was associated with therapeutic modifications (P < 0.0001); where a score higher than 1354 was related to 90% probability of changing therapy [area under the receiver operative characteristic (AUROC) 0.80 (95%CI: 0.69-0.88)].
VCE significantly changed the therapeutic management of CD patients, even in those with long-term disease. Systematic use of Patency capsule allowed for no videocapsule retention.
分析克罗恩病(CD)患者接受视频胶囊内镜检查(VCE)后的治疗变化,并评估Lewis评分和通畅胶囊的效用。
对每例有VCE指征的患者进行通畅胶囊检查,通畅检查结果为阴性的患者不接受VCE。选取2011年1月至2014年2月期间接受VCE的确诊CD患者进行本研究;排除疑似CD患者,无论VCE结果如何,因为我们的目的是探讨VCE前后CD患者治疗方案的差异。VCE结果不明确的患者也被排除。患者必须至少1个月未使用非甾体类抗炎药。符合这些标准的患者被分为三组之一:分期组(因CD分期而接受VCE的无症状CD患者)、发作组(活动性CD患者)或术后组(评估术后复发的CD患者)。对每次VCE检查计算Lewis评分。进行统计分析以探讨VCE结果对CD患者治疗管理的影响,并评估Lewis评分的效用。
在总共542例VCE检查中,135例是在CD患者中进行的。通畅胶囊排除了近25%本应接受VCE的患者。VCE期间未报告视频胶囊滞留情况。在这135例患者中,29例因VCE时CD诊断未确立而被排除。因此,最终分析共纳入106例患者。其中,大多数在分期组(n = 73,69%),其余在发作组(n = 23,22%)或术后组(n = 10,9%)。诊断与VCE之间的中位时间为5.5年。总体而言,VCE确定了40%患者的治疗变化:VCE后只有21%的患者未使用免疫抑制剂,而VCE前为44%(P < 0.001)。VCE前后的治疗差异在分期组和发作组中具有统计学意义。此外,根据从诊断到VCE日期的时间分层时,患者存在显著差异。较高的Lewis评分与治疗调整相关(P < 0.0001);评分高于1354与90%的治疗改变概率相关[受试者操作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)为0.80(95%CI:0.69 - 0.88)]。
VCE显著改变了CD患者的治疗管理,即使是长期患病的患者。系统使用通畅胶囊可避免视频胶囊滞留。