Richter E J
Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Materials, Aachen University Medical Center, Aachen, West Germany.
J Prosthet Dent. 1989 May;61(5):602-9. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(89)90285-0.
A discussion of loads applied to implants must include the clinical consideration that not only rigid implant types are used, such as the Tübingen immediate implant and the TPS screw implant without shock absorber, but also systems with inherent resilience integrated in the implant design, such as the IMC and Flexiroot implants. The common goal of all of these implant systems is to achieve a stable anchorage of the implant body in the bone tissue, that is, contact osteogenesis or osteointegration. In the implant-to-bone interface region there is an implant mobility resulting from the elasticity of the bone. The question of whether additional implant-integrated elastic elements are necessary to simulate the periodontal attachment is controversial.
对施加于种植体的负荷进行讨论时，必须纳入临床考量，即不仅使用刚性种植体类型，如蒂宾根即刻种植体和无减震器的TPS螺旋种植体，还使用在种植体设计中融入了固有弹性的系统，如IMC种植体和Flexiroot种植体。所有这些种植体系统的共同目标是在骨组织中实现种植体本体的稳定锚固，即接触性骨生成或骨整合。在种植体与骨的界面区域，由于骨的弹性会产生种植体移动性。关于是否需要额外的种植体集成弹性元件来模拟牙周附着这一问题存在争议。
